Danbischof's Avatar

Danbischof

@danbischof.bsky.social

danbischof.com Political Scientist: studying democracy with experiments & data Professor | University of Münster Associate Professor | Aarhus University (he/him | "Sie" als Anrede brauche ich nicht)

6,732 Followers  |  1,384 Following  |  858 Posts  |  Joined: 20.09.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Danbischof (@danbischof.bsky.social)

The critique of unmeasured confounding is often levied in a lazy/broad way. It is trivially true in any observational study. But if the critic can't think of a plausible such confounder and posit a reasonable direction/magnitude of its bias then they're not doing productive science.

01.03.2026 18:47 — 👍 110    🔁 19    💬 7    📌 8

Thx for having me! Looking very much forward to this:

27.02.2026 15:12 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I have been trying to summarize social psychology research on anti-immigrant sentiment for 3 weeks now. While I can summarize families of results based on types of designs, I still struggle to summarize the theory used to make sense of results. Anybody has a clearly written piece they can recommend?

27.02.2026 10:22 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

thx!

25.02.2026 13:25 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Call for applications for a 3 years doctoral contract For the ERC GREENLOSS Project - Application deadline: May 17, 2026

📢 JOB ALERT! Fully funded 3-year PhD in Climate & Comparative Politics at @sciencespo-cee.bsky.social. Starting in September.
The project is on the political consequences of climate policies in carbon-intensive communities across Europe.
🗓 Deadline: May 17
www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etude...

24.02.2026 10:37 — 👍 52    🔁 45    💬 0    📌 2

Zu echt. Hagel fand 2018, es gäbe "schlimmere Termine für einen 29jährigen Abgeordneten *grins*" als eine Realschulklasse mit 80% "Mädchen" zu besuchen. Von Eva, die höchstens 16 war, mit "braunem Haar und rehbraunen Augen", war er anscheinend auch angetan.

Immer schade, wenn das Bild so passt

24.02.2026 09:50 — 👍 769    🔁 222    💬 91    📌 98

Strong Facebook vibes. This is bad, why?

22.02.2026 21:04 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

So, LinkedIn…really? Puh 😮‍💨

22.02.2026 20:26 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

We‘re very excited for the next edition of the Summer School for Women* in Political Methodology in Mannheim! ✨

Join us and apply until 1 March!

More info in @melinscribe.bsky.social‘s thread below and here: summerschoolwpm.org

Application form: sosci.sowi.uni-mannheim.de/wpm/

02.02.2026 17:08 — 👍 28    🔁 21    💬 0    📌 0

This is crazy. It would have taken years! of work:

18.02.2026 22:18 — 👍 7    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Strategische Prozessführung

Auf @soziopolis.bsky.social ist heute das Dossier zu strategischer Prozessführung erschienen, das ich mit Verena Frick herausgebe. Sechs Autorinnen beleuchten strategische Klagen aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven: www.soziopolis.de/dossier/stra...

18.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 14    🔁 8    💬 2    📌 0
Post image

Russia, Venezuela, Iran, China, the Sahel region, the United States ...

Want to know why state agents carry out brutal repression — or participate in illegal coups?

Our new book "Making a Career in Dictatorship" provides answers — it just got published by @academic.oup.com:

tinyurl.com/ystwm3tf

16.02.2026 11:09 — 👍 133    🔁 73    💬 12    📌 10

I'm not dropping the name but you can guess who I'm thinking of...

16.02.2026 13:21 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

This is already happening. Aarhus pol sci stopped teaching stata, license sure will follow. Many German unis stopped stata licenses.

This is done. Staying with stata is high risk now.

15.02.2026 19:05 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Die Grundstruktur der Rede: Wer die AfD verbieten will, wolle "rechte" Politik generell verbieten und sei damit selbst der Demokratiefeind. Wir kennen diese Argumentation, man nennt sie "Strohmann". Art. 21 GG fragt nicht, ob eine Partei links oder rechts ist. Es geht um die Verfassungswidrigkeit.

15.02.2026 15:10 — 👍 1042    🔁 126    💬 8    📌 4

Exactly what he says:

15.02.2026 18:56 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

But you do have an AI subscription? Also: many unis already started implanting own AIs, no?

15.02.2026 18:55 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Also: ppl a) need to know about IVF (correlated with education/social status?) b) usually self-paid?

15.02.2026 18:53 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

But: IVF might also mean these women tried to get pregnant for a long time already.

15.02.2026 18:51 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Pretty clever idea to get at the selection effects into motherhood. Must read:

15.02.2026 18:42 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
‘Handmaid’s Tale future’: Reform’s Matt Goodwin sparks outcry with fertility comments Byelection candidate accused of indulging ‘alt right fantasy’ by suggesting women need ‘biological reality’ check

“I long for the days when a midlife crisis for men meant getting a motorbike and a leather jacket, not trying to get elected to indulge alt right fantasies about ensuring women were pregnant as soon as they were fertile and then didn’t go to university"

www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

13.02.2026 18:25 — 👍 65    🔁 25    💬 1    📌 2

Niemand:

Berliner*innen: Klar kann ich dich besuchen ich bin sofort in 60 Minuten da

13.02.2026 18:02 — 👍 334    🔁 15    💬 14    📌 5

Very glad that our first DEMNORM paper found such a great home at @thejop.bsky.social. If you’re interested in the role of social desirability in online surveys, check out the thread and paper below ⬇️

13.02.2026 08:32 — 👍 23    🔁 7    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks, Alex!

12.02.2026 17:40 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Thrilled about our first DEMNORM paper and that it has been conditionally accepted at @thejop.bsky.social!

12.02.2026 13:47 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

#thx!

12.02.2026 13:24 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
OSF

This might be interesting for: @mamalik.bsky.social @eliasdinas.bsky.social @dziblatt.bsky.social @amaliaab.bsky.social @valentimvicente.bsky.social

URL: osf.io/preprints/os...

12.02.2026 13:06 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Thanks: Special thanks go out to @brendannyhan.bsky.social . Without him pushing us to write this up, we would have not written the paper! We also thank everyone else who has commented on this paper.

12.02.2026 13:06 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments - Volume 114 Issue 4

💡✨ Inspiration and thank you:
The paper was heavily inspired by work of @graemeblair.com , @aecoppock.bsky.social & Margaret Moor + Jonathan Mummolo & Erik Peterson.

See:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

12.02.2026 13:06 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

💥 Bluntly:

If you run online surveys in democratic contexts, you may be worrying too much about social desirability bias.

And maybe over-correcting for a problem that's smaller than we assume.

12.02.2026 13:06 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0