BLUE! BLUE! BLUE! BLUE!
05.11.2025 13:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@pseudovscience.bsky.social
32, Scientist(Biology), Sick of Trump's Shit, Your god is probably a myth... It is.
BLUE! BLUE! BLUE! BLUE!
05.11.2025 13:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If someone really rich is against something it's almost a guarantee that you, as a relatively good and decent person, should be for it.
04.11.2025 19:20 โ ๐ 31 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"Quite likely" is a stretch. I'd say probably 10% of that is kids and the rest are people who dont want to put their information on a porn site. Hell, im in my 30s and I got rid of Spotify and YouTube because of their new identity verification rules.
31.10.2025 20:16 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Did anyone expect a Kardashian to be intelligent?
31.10.2025 14:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It should alarm everyone that the Director of the #fbi can just claim you are a terrorist with no evidence and hold you hostage without informing your lawyer. Republican or democrat, that should scare the shit out of you.
31.10.2025 12:42 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The sad part is I couldn't tell this was satire until I saw it was posted by The Onion. The fact that this is 100% believable should scare the fuck out of all of us.
30.10.2025 20:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Boycotting elections has ALWAYS led to dictatorship and fascism. Never once has boycotting elections worked out for those boycotting. Unless im missing one but everything im seeing tells us boycotting elections results in destruction.
30.10.2025 20:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0And i will be watching that video in full when I get home by the way. Thank you.
29.10.2025 20:06 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Oh no, not at all. Debates and discussions can always move to the heated side. We are all only human. I am sorry for immediately trying to dismiss you as a hater.
29.10.2025 19:47 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I have donated so much to them. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
29.10.2025 19:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Hmm... this is troubling for me. I thought i had researched TST very thoroughly before signing up. This is a bit heart breaking.
29.10.2025 19:39 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Okay, let me read and ill get back to you.
29.10.2025 19:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I would assume there's a board of directors, no?
29.10.2025 19:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Okay, so TST loses. A lot of court cases, how does that make them bad though. Apologies for me not understanding earlier, but im still very confused as to how this makes them bad.
29.10.2025 19:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Nevermind. I see where my mistake was. Give me a bit to read.
29.10.2025 19:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Because im confused here. This case number: 1:23-cv-02780 According to zero public docket records Federal or state, has anything to do with Chicago. The federal case that pops up is in Michigan. The only place I find that case number connected to TST is the site you gave. Which is why im confused.
29.10.2025 19:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0And why is that? You cannot just claim something, then say its basic stuff, and not provide an explanation. That either shows A youre lying, or B youre lazy.
29.10.2025 19:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So Federal Court cases can have the same case number is what youre telling me?
29.10.2025 18:58 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Right? ๐
29.10.2025 18:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Also, none of those things have been in ANYTHING you've sent. If you actually sent real court cases that didn't lead to a different case when I put them into search, that'd be great.
29.10.2025 18:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Im not disregarding anything. Im showing you what is wrong with your story here. Its not adding up. Why is it that when I type the case numbers in i get completely different cases than the one it says they are? Answer that question and then ill listen.
29.10.2025 18:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It goes to this website. Not the court documents. Interestingly enough though, when I take the case number and type it into Google I get completely different cases than the one your website is saying... its pretty strange. ๐ค
29.10.2025 18:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Not to mention when I type the case number in, it gives me something completely different.
29.10.2025 18:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yes, im telling you when I click them they dont go anywhere. Then when I look them up, Google says they dont exist. Thats what im telling you.
29.10.2025 18:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Also... this is more of the same. Just opinion pieces. Where are your facts that theyre doing shady shit? Youre just giving opinion pieces.
29.10.2025 18:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No one at the TST has ever told me to disregard former members. And there are people in TST who have been there way longer than you were who say the opposite... so why should I take your advice over theirs? See why appeal to authority is a fallacy?
29.10.2025 18:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeah, the youtube video provides no evidence and I just tried to find some of those court cases. The first 2 dont even exist... unless you have a case number? Hard for me to believe you when your only sources cant be verified. ๐คทโโ๏ธ Nice try though.
29.10.2025 18:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0But I am growing tired of this brick wall debate so ill let you get the last words and allow the masses to decide whoch person here is logical. Toodaloo.
29.10.2025 18:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Which means it is not affiliated with any faith organization. It is its own entity.
29.10.2025 18:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Incorrect. The TST allocates funds from its branches. That is why they are different than any church.
29.10.2025 18:14 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0