Greg Palermo's Avatar

Greg Palermo

@palermog.bsky.social

Assistant Teaching Prof, Emory University Writing Program & Affiliated Faculty, Data Science. Citation, data, & disciplinary rhetoric. Co-editor, JITP Reviews. πŸ“·πŸŽΎβ˜•οΈπŸŽΉ. Opinions mine. he/they

883 Followers  |  916 Following  |  174 Posts  |  Joined: 10.08.2023  |  2.3551

Latest posts by palermog.bsky.social on Bluesky

This study show that using poems to jailbreak LLMs is... super effective? What the heck.

20.11.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 302    πŸ” 99    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 44
Preview
I Set A Trap To Catch My Students Cheating With AI. The Results Were Shocking. "Students are not just undermining their ability to learn, but to someday lead."

To β€œmy students and to anyone who might listen, I say: Don’t surrender to AI your ability to read, write and think when others once risked their lives and died for the freedom to do so.”

www.huffpost.com/entry/histor...

21.11.2025 00:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1716    πŸ” 669    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 121

On ai use by university students

21.11.2025 13:01 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

WE WON. I am *begging* you to take note of who did this. *Not* UCLA adminβ€”they’re still scuttling around behind closed doors, attempting to appeaseβ€”but FACULTY AND STAFF, led by AAUP.

15.11.2025 00:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3958    πŸ” 1095    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 22
As one Massachusetts school administrator recently said; this moment with AI is remarkably like the moment when we were introduced to asbestos. Yes, it had some remarkably promising characteristics – fireproofing! – and had some real utility in science, research, and industrial applications. But a profit-driven industry bullied us into inserting it everywhere; into our homes and schools and public spaces, before we really understood the risks. This resulted in decades, if not centuries, of illness, injuries, deaths, and the astronomical financial burden of trying to remove the stuff.

As you, the leaders and policymakers in our schools, craft an AI policy for our district, we the undersigned call on you to:

1. Ban AI tools into the classroom, protect our students and teachers from de-skilling and allow them the space and time to engage in assignments themselves.

2. Resist any direct financial relationship or contracts with AI providers, as well as the β€œtraining” they might offer.

3. Provide a digital literacy curriculum to help students navigate the current digital landscape, and promote critical engagement with technology.

4. Guarantee that anywhere generative AI has already entered our classrooms or curriculum, an opt-out will allow students and teachers to refuse the use of these products at no risk to their grades, progress or employment.

As one Massachusetts school administrator recently said; this moment with AI is remarkably like the moment when we were introduced to asbestos. Yes, it had some remarkably promising characteristics – fireproofing! – and had some real utility in science, research, and industrial applications. But a profit-driven industry bullied us into inserting it everywhere; into our homes and schools and public spaces, before we really understood the risks. This resulted in decades, if not centuries, of illness, injuries, deaths, and the astronomical financial burden of trying to remove the stuff. As you, the leaders and policymakers in our schools, craft an AI policy for our district, we the undersigned call on you to: 1. Ban AI tools into the classroom, protect our students and teachers from de-skilling and allow them the space and time to engage in assignments themselves. 2. Resist any direct financial relationship or contracts with AI providers, as well as the β€œtraining” they might offer. 3. Provide a digital literacy curriculum to help students navigate the current digital landscape, and promote critical engagement with technology. 4. Guarantee that anywhere generative AI has already entered our classrooms or curriculum, an opt-out will allow students and teachers to refuse the use of these products at no risk to their grades, progress or employment.

Love to see community action against this AI nonsense! neighborhoodview.org/2025/11/13/d...

14.11.2025 11:42 β€” πŸ‘ 992    πŸ” 429    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 38
I stared at my terminal facing those red error messages that I hate to see. An AWS [Ama-
zon Web Services] error glared back at me. I didn’t want to figure it out without AI’s
help.
After 12 years of coding, I’d somehow become worse at my own craft. And this isn’t
hyperboleβ€”this is the new reality for software developers.
Namanyay Goel (2025, n.p.)
To show how serious the situation has become, one need only think about our last round of mark-
ing essays by AI undergraduate students. What jumps out of the page, for us, is something that con-
tradicts the rhetoric our colleagues promote, namely, it is evident that students need moreessay work
assigned to them, not less (Kosmyna et al. 2025). Almost every essay was poor on some dimension
that does not befit students in their final years of undergraduate study: the writing is often super-
ficial, the language does not reflect students’ stage and knowledge, citations are frequently misused,
and (most shockingly because it is so easy), the reference style is not applied correctly. This means that
the constellation of skills required to write a good academic essay has not been nurtured enough or
has atrophied. What this means is also that regardless of factual LLM use by the students, their ability
to write essays is on the floor, and not, as many seem to claim, at ceiling where one cannot differentiate
a good essay from a plagiarised or otherwise dishonest attempt of an essay. Importantly, the training
of writing skills should be done in the context of critical reckoning with the norms and pressures sur-
rounding the work expected of students (i.e. high study load, so-called student excellence, financial
pressure to graduate, etc.).
In this context, it is also important to be wary of arguments that wrongly position LLMs as, mak-
ing education more democratic, accessible, and equitable by removing language barriers, removing
unequal access to mentorship, and increase diversity, equity and inclusion in…

I stared at my terminal facing those red error messages that I hate to see. An AWS [Ama- zon Web Services] error glared back at me. I didn’t want to figure it out without AI’s help. After 12 years of coding, I’d somehow become worse at my own craft. And this isn’t hyperboleβ€”this is the new reality for software developers. Namanyay Goel (2025, n.p.) To show how serious the situation has become, one need only think about our last round of mark- ing essays by AI undergraduate students. What jumps out of the page, for us, is something that con- tradicts the rhetoric our colleagues promote, namely, it is evident that students need moreessay work assigned to them, not less (Kosmyna et al. 2025). Almost every essay was poor on some dimension that does not befit students in their final years of undergraduate study: the writing is often super- ficial, the language does not reflect students’ stage and knowledge, citations are frequently misused, and (most shockingly because it is so easy), the reference style is not applied correctly. This means that the constellation of skills required to write a good academic essay has not been nurtured enough or has atrophied. What this means is also that regardless of factual LLM use by the students, their ability to write essays is on the floor, and not, as many seem to claim, at ceiling where one cannot differentiate a good essay from a plagiarised or otherwise dishonest attempt of an essay. Importantly, the training of writing skills should be done in the context of critical reckoning with the norms and pressures sur- rounding the work expected of students (i.e. high study load, so-called student excellence, financial pressure to graduate, etc.). In this context, it is also important to be wary of arguments that wrongly position LLMs as, mak- ing education more democratic, accessible, and equitable by removing language barriers, removing unequal access to mentorship, and increase diversity, equity and inclusion in…

This is what LLMs reduce academics to: rehashing basic research skills even in the final year students. It's honestly heartbreaking. It's not just random Bsky people, we see it at work all the time.

See section 3.7 here: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

15.11.2025 07:53 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

15.11.2025 09:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You know that you can stop posting through this and admit a mistake right?

13.11.2025 21:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Cavers. Turncoats. Chickenshits. Fuckers.

10.11.2025 11:14 β€” πŸ‘ 374    πŸ” 134    πŸ’¬ 36    πŸ“Œ 36

This is why you're not supposed to negotiate with terrorists

10.11.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 36    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Every few weeks we gotta make posts like this”call your dem reps to tell them to not vote to allow Lord Killdude to shove people into a volcano” and then the dem reps go β€œwe’ve made an amazing deal where Lord Killdude can have his volcano so long as he promises not to shove people into it”

10.11.2025 01:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3512    πŸ” 1053    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 15

My family has been without half our income for 40 days. It has been.. very hard.

We are willing to feel that pain so people can have health care next year, or to undo these illegal recissions.

We are not willing to have been put through this for NOTHING.

10.11.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 25809    πŸ” 6601    πŸ’¬ 492    πŸ“Œ 372

Some Dems fuming about this deal.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth:

β€œI simply cannot, and I will not, vote to do nothing to help protect [ppl who rely on ACA] from Trump’s vindictive and malicious efforts in exchange for a vague promise from the least trustworthy Republican party in our nation’s history."

10.11.2025 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 825    πŸ” 154    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 12

How do so many democrats still not understand that the ACA *was* the compromise.

09.11.2025 22:14 β€” πŸ‘ 2004    πŸ” 445    πŸ’¬ 35    πŸ“Œ 13

look I know being an engaged citizen IS the work of democracy but it is also the work of elected officials not to create situations where everyone has to be mobilized all the time to prevent them from allowing some kind of Dickensian horror on a Sunday night while you're in between loads of laundry

09.11.2025 23:37 β€” πŸ‘ 4049    πŸ” 1280    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 55
Post image

This isn’t very hard, folks.

10.11.2025 00:09 β€” πŸ‘ 8510    πŸ” 2281    πŸ’¬ 88    πŸ“Œ 78
Sara Whitmer
β€’ β€’ β€’
1h β€’ 8
I'm sure many of you have heard by now that earlier this week, IU k*lled the print edition of its student paper, the IDS. The issue that was supposed to print this week contained criticism of the Whitten regime and IUs further slide into scist control, and they couldn't allow that to happen during Homecoming, when all the rich alumni are in town.
Enter Purdue! The Purdue student paper, The Exponent, owns its own presses. Yesterday, in an act of tremendous solidarity with their biggest rival school, they printed the forbidden issue of the IDS. They then drove it to Bloomington overnight and stocked all of the IDS boxes on campus, just in time for Homecoming.
Solidarity is what makes us stronger, and solidarity will be what ultimately allows us to triumph, if we can ever truly get it together. I hope everyone has a fun, safe day if they're going out today, and I hope we can think about what acts of solidarity we can begin taking to really make this movement MOVE - beyond a permitted expression of upset into more active resistance.
75
12 comments

Sara Whitmer β€’ β€’ β€’ 1h β€’ 8 I'm sure many of you have heard by now that earlier this week, IU k*lled the print edition of its student paper, the IDS. The issue that was supposed to print this week contained criticism of the Whitten regime and IUs further slide into scist control, and they couldn't allow that to happen during Homecoming, when all the rich alumni are in town. Enter Purdue! The Purdue student paper, The Exponent, owns its own presses. Yesterday, in an act of tremendous solidarity with their biggest rival school, they printed the forbidden issue of the IDS. They then drove it to Bloomington overnight and stocked all of the IDS boxes on campus, just in time for Homecoming. Solidarity is what makes us stronger, and solidarity will be what ultimately allows us to triumph, if we can ever truly get it together. I hope everyone has a fun, safe day if they're going out today, and I hope we can think about what acts of solidarity we can begin taking to really make this movement MOVE - beyond a permitted expression of upset into more active resistance. 75 12 comments

Purdue to the rescue of IU student newspaper, whose institution was attempting censorship. Details in alt!

18.10.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 6757    πŸ” 1783    πŸ’¬ 138    πŸ“Œ 401

I did not say it was a gotcha question.

23.09.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I have a somewhat different take, which is that it’s adept of her and part of avoiding bad faith uptakes. Very necessary when pretty much every move you make ever is scrutinized in a double bind.

23.09.2025 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Nothing says β€œland of the free” like armed agents of the state saying β€œshow me your papers if you want your daughter back” bsky.app/profile/nbcb...

23.09.2025 08:54 β€” πŸ‘ 7539    πŸ” 3148    πŸ’¬ 182    πŸ“Œ 92

What’s wild to me is that they are the alchemists in their own metaphor, and it seems like projection.

22.09.2025 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

her name couldn’t really be WILL OBEY

20.09.2025 03:37 β€” πŸ‘ 6439    πŸ” 1087    πŸ’¬ 201    πŸ“Œ 52

It never works. Ever..

20.09.2025 14:09 β€” πŸ‘ 132    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Failing to defend our rights never leads to keeping those rights. Every single human and civil right has to be fought for against erosion, even when you think those rights are guaranteed. Our institutions keep refusing to understand this.

20.09.2025 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 151    πŸ” 43    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is genuinely horrifying. Who says that with a straight face as though it’s a good thing!?

20.09.2025 14:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No, it isn’t. That fallacy requires that there’s an argument about whether the person is a member of the group or not. And to protect a generalization. This person is saying you can’t generalize millennial sentiment based on an individual, which is the actual logical error here.

20.09.2025 13:33 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The H1-B visa thing is, like everything else in the Trump administration, set up to carve up exceptions for friends and punish enemies. It’s the authoritarian thru-line that stitches everything together.

20.09.2025 12:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1526    πŸ” 559    πŸ’¬ 48    πŸ“Œ 51

u know who are skeptics
scientists are skeptics

being anti-science is not being a skeptic

16.09.2025 23:12 β€” πŸ‘ 829    πŸ” 142    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 8
Preview
Charlie Kirk, Redeemed: A Political Class Finds Its Lost Cause By ignoring the rhetoric and actions of the Turning Point USA founder, pundits and politicians are sanitizing his legacy.

"Can they truly be so ignorant to the words of a man they have so rushed to memorialize? I don’t know. But the most telling detail in Klein’s column was that, for all his praise, there was not a single word in the piece from Kirk himself."

Ta-Nehisi Coates, with receipts.

16.09.2025 21:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2924    πŸ” 876    πŸ’¬ 48    πŸ“Œ 48

@palermog is following 20 prominent accounts