Iโd suggest something on the irony of him seemingly having a transnational vision of a religious homeland tied to war.
But given doesnโt apply to Latin America, seems more a case of there being no substantial grounding to the stances.
@davidsterman.bsky.social
Deputy Director, New America Future Security program
Iโd suggest something on the irony of him seemingly having a transnational vision of a religious homeland tied to war.
But given doesnโt apply to Latin America, seems more a case of there being no substantial grounding to the stances.
Seems just days ago Hegseth was defending the drug boat strikes on the basis of a shift away from wars for othersโ homelands.
02.11.2025 00:16 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Does that as standard prevent the drug strikes - no. The Yemen strike campaign - no. The Iran strikes - not really. Drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia - not really.
01.11.2025 02:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Worth noting avoiding harm to infantry / experience of early Iraq war type war experiences for infantry is not a particularly strong grounding for opposition to many of the kinds of wars/military actions the U.S. is/has involved itself in in recent years.
01.11.2025 02:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Big questions about rhetoric like this and how it serves to support Hegseth style warrior ethos from the left.
Not coincidental in my view how that connects with the way defenses of the tattoo happen to line up here as well.
Signature strikes for activity thatโs not part of an armed conflict or enough on its own to make you a combatant.
Very not good.
theintercept.com/2025/10/31/t...
it's good that he can still be forced to do this. it's very bad that this was not the position from the start.
31.10.2025 20:51 โ ๐ 470 ๐ 85 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 0In other words own your wars. That they were often fought for regional interests is not reason to falsely put your choices on others.
29.10.2025 01:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The idea that the U.S. was just defending othersโ homelands is deeply objectionable.
Those wars were/are often driven by regional security interests but those are tied to American interests.
Meanwhile, others have little to no input into our wars and have been subject to sudden withdrawals.
Quite a killing spree. Execution without trial. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
28.10.2025 15:19 โ ๐ 454 ๐ 190 ๐ฌ 84 ๐ 34Sontagโs critique of metaphor and endlessness in the war on terror for me captured a key point but far from all dynamics behind endlessness.
But current visions of the drug strikes hew even more closely to what she was noting imo than much of the war on terror.
www.economist.com/united-state...
Rand Paul on Trump's strikes on boats: "I would call them extrajudicial killings. This is akin to what China does, what Iran does with drug dealers -- they summarily execute people without presenting evidence to the public. So it's wrong."
26.10.2025 13:39 โ ๐ 6028 ๐ 1662 ๐ฌ 334 ๐ 149Really think if folks did some digging on the defenders of this, it would be very revealing that many probably have long trails showing substantial evidence of their own lying and dissembling in order to downplay this.
The combo of 2010s far right online, Azov symbols etc just makes not credible
Gotta say, I think thereโs also about a zero percent chance he didnโt know what it was. Not like he previously aired a piece on Nazi tattoos in which it is extremely visible in a series of photos he used to illustrate the white supremacist context of other tattoos. www.rawstory.com/2016/03/cenk...
25.10.2025 15:59 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Big update on Somalia strike data.
Per AFRICOM, 84 airstrikes in 2025. Also 1 ground op (and two alleged strikes in our tally)
There was a 9/24 strike w/o a press release that didnโt kill anyone.
Dates for 7 of 9 strikes reported as multi-day op ending 8/23.
www.newamerica.org/future-secur...
If the tattoo itself wasnโt an issue for so many folks how about the pretty strong evidence of lying. www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/p...
25.10.2025 00:07 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0CC @bcfinucane.bsky.social @wesleymorgan.bsky.social
24.10.2025 20:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Big update on Somalia strike data.
Per AFRICOM, 84 airstrikes in 2025. Also 1 ground op (and two alleged strikes in our tally)
There was a 9/24 strike w/o a press release that didnโt kill anyone.
Dates for 7 of 9 strikes reported as multi-day op ending 8/23.
www.newamerica.org/future-secur...
To be clear I asked about the linked Garowe report on the strike not Antiwarโs write up.
24.10.2025 19:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0For what itโs worth when I asked about this report, AFRICOM said their latest strike was on October 20 the day prior. news.antiwar.com/2025/10/23/c...
24.10.2025 19:31 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Lot of folks including many who portrayed themselves as critical of Americaโs endless wars helped get us to this point by not taking process and authorization issues seriously and not mobilizing on those issues.
24.10.2025 05:02 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Not great when the U.S. government is a suspect in a murder mystery.
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/23/w...
Good thing a portion of the restraint movement including parts of its left flank dismissed the question of process/war powers as important or relevant.
Iโm sure that didnโt play a role in developing the incentive structure that could allow this.
(Not a critique of the whole but a specific trend)
These comparisons are bad.
But my nitpick is if youโre going to do them you have to choose either AQ or ISIS. Theyโre quite different and using either but especially both suggests a lack of care/experts involved in the review/construction of these arguments.
People saying things like "oh come on, why do you care about a little Nazi symbol?" is, in the very question, a sign of decline.
The answer "because Nazi symbol," with no further explanation needed, was assumed.
When we had that consensus, it was better.
One thing that hasn't been much discussed so far is that, in addition to putting enormous pressure on very fragile regional states, the US military campaign risks turning drug-trafficking cartels into the kinds of political terrorist insurgencies Trump II is for now falsely portraying them as.
22.10.2025 09:55 โ ๐ 209 ๐ 49 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 6Point is reliant on this being stills of the video of the strike in question but all the reporting Iโve seen supports that.
21.10.2025 04:02 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Donโt confuse the no crime โin Ecuadorean territoryโ line with the idea that the vessel - seemingly this semisubmersible was just some fishing boat.
In my view it actually undermines the core point that drug trafficking is not cause for being a military target and is not a capital offense.
And why did the White House stop sharing such info on select Somalia strikes around May?
And why are details on the Caribbean strikes coming straight from the White House and not the combatant command?