You can only read books written by AI!
04.08.2025 16:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social
Appellate lawyer at Wright, Close & Barger in Houston, with a Fifth Circuit and TX appellate practice. So-called Dean, #appellatetwitter. Host of The Appellate Wanderer podcast
You can only read books written by AI!
04.08.2025 16:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You could read just what some person in 18th century England could have read and that would just be a good start on reading. Much less the flood of books in the last centuries
04.08.2025 16:17 β π 19 π 0 π¬ 4 π 0There is a supply problem of books for a young person to read is an incredible take. Itβs a masterpiece.
04.08.2025 16:15 β π 96 π 2 π¬ 11 π 0This is my favorite dumb tweet ever.
04.08.2025 16:11 β π 89 π 3 π¬ 2 π 0BACKGROUND This dispute arises from the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Number D902,588 (the ββ588 Patentβ) by multiple entities. (Id. ΒΆΒΆ 2, 7). The alleged infringers are entities operating in China. (Id. ΒΆ 8). Plaintiff claims, without specific 1 Accordingly, the redacted version of Plaintiffβs Complaint (Doc. 1) is also dismissed without prejudice. Case 6:25-cv-01050-PGB-DCI Document 14 Filed 07/15/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID 6941 2 details, that all forty (40) Defendants listed in Schedule A (Doc. 9-3) sell or offer for sale Infringing Products. (Doc. 9, ΒΆ 10). Plaintiff asserts a single count of patent design infringement against all forty (40) Defendants, none of whom are named in the caption of the Complaint, which violates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a).
Judge in the MDFL dismisses a #ScheduleA complaint (without prejudice) as a "shotgun pleading": www.scribd.com/document/897...
04.08.2025 13:26 β π 11 π 6 π¬ 1 π 0Grandma pizza
Grilled shrimp with butter
I donβt know what kind of dinner this is -
Letβs call it American jumble - but gulf shrimp with compound butter (butter, herbs, lemon zest, garlic) and pizza squares.
Heβs got a great story about how his job was to run off with the slot machine when the cops came, but I need to get the full thing one evening and record it here.
03.08.2025 22:54 β π 61 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I should have said, the scholarship was for Armenian Catholics. Thatβs why I mentioned it.
Anyway, Iβm sure many of our parents have been worried about our plans and ambitions that sound risky. But not many went to a fortune teller!
My dad ultimately confronted her and got his passport back, and went to India for his degree, which set him on the path to the US eventually.
And in fact, the palm reader was accidentally correct. He never came home to live. But eventually his whole family moved to Toronto.
He couldnβt find it anywhere. He was frantic. Finally, his sister came to him, and told him his mother, my grandmother had hidden it. She had gone to a Palm reader, and they had foretold that if my Dad went to Bombay, he would never come home again. /3
03.08.2025 22:48 β π 38 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Dad is Armenian Catholic, and was a good student at his high school. So, as Iβve told on here, he found a college scholarship in then Bombay, and secured it.
So the new story starts here. He was packed to go, and was looking for his passport. /2
A new story from my Dad Iβd never heard before.
As Iβve said, my dad grew up in Beirut. His family was poor - my grandpa was a cobbler, and then when his hands gave out, ran a bakery where there was an illegal slot machine. Anyway, my dad was good at school and wanted to go to college. /1
He spent his summers mining in the Colorado mountains, trying to raise money for his firm website.
03.08.2025 22:42 β π 24 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No thank you
03.08.2025 14:13 β π 92 π 7 π¬ 11 π 0A new cocktail: @anthonyrickey.bsky.social recently introduced me to the Mickey Finn. Itβs really good! Bracing, but really good.
punchdrink.com/articles/mic...
I mean either raw or cooked in beef tallow for extra manosity
02.08.2025 22:15 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0As a gimmick, you serve the sushi with celery and bleu cheese dressing
02.08.2025 22:11 β π 28 π 0 π¬ 6 π 1Wait sushi sports bar. This needs to happen
02.08.2025 22:08 β π 24 π 0 π¬ 9 π 0But do you eat the sushi first or the wings?
02.08.2025 22:06 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 6 π 0Just saw a restaurant billed as selling βsushi and wingsβ and honestly, Iβm into it.
02.08.2025 22:05 β π 159 π 8 π¬ 24 π 2DECISION AND ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE Pursuant to the order of the District Court for New Jersey (District Court), Khalil v. Trump, No. 25-CV-01963 (MEF)(MAH), 2025 WL 1983755 (D.N.J. July 17, 2025), the Court, hereby vacates, its decision of April 11, 2025 !, , finding the Respondent removable as charged pursuant to INA Β§ 237(a)(4)(C)(i). 2 3 4 Digitally signed by JAMEE JAMEE COMANS COMANS Date: 2025.07.31 15:54:46 -05'00' July 31, 2025 Date Jamee E. Comans United States Immigration Judge ' The District Court for New Jersey erroneously found that this Court's determination on removability under INA Β§ 237(a)(4)(C)(i) was decided on June 20, 2025 in its written decision. This is wholly untrue. This Court issued an oral decision on April 11, 2025 at the contested removability hearing to specifically address the sustainability of the charge pursuant to INA Β§ 237(a)(4)(C)(i). The Court's oral decision of April 11, 2025 is documented in the procedural history of the Court's written decision on the Respondent's (Mr. Khalil) application for relief from removal dated June 20, 2025. 2 The District Court for New Jersey acknowledges that Mr. Khalil "persuasively argues that if the Section 1227 [237(a)(4)(C)(i)] finding remains in the immigration judge's June 20 decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals would simply have no choice under existing case law but to affirm it. See Khalil v. Joyce, 2025 WL 1232369, at *41-42 (D.N.J. Apr. 29, 2025); Petitioner's Brief (July 17, 2025) at 4 (citing declarations)." Khalil v. Trump, No. 25-CV-01963 (MEF)(MAH), 2025 WL 1983755 (D.N.J. July 17, 2025). he Diet tigrain triv ersey also eknowledge is district sats such as thiend, indi ha, appellas urisdiction inter the with the important work of immigration tribunals, the orders issued by the District Court of New Jersey have departed from providing remedies in a habeas petition and embarked on interfering with the legal process and the authority of the immigration court bestowed upon itβ¦
NEW: The immigration judge overseeing Mahmoud Khalil's case is *seething* over being ordered by Judge Farbiarz to vacate her decision finding Khalil removable under Marco Rubio's determination, accusing Farbiarz of "interfering with the legal process and the authority of the immigration court."
01.08.2025 17:13 β π 633 π 139 π¬ 31 π 31Lyon!
02.08.2025 13:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0However, and alas, the Judge at least has judicial immunity against the allegations. Judge Ho dissents.
02.08.2025 13:13 β π 85 π 5 π¬ 5 π 0Hijinks! A judge calls juror in for a venire - including people with him he has a grudge - and then has them arrested for violating Texas law about juror residency. Likely all an elaborate set up to eliminate 3 voters in a county with only 64 residents! /1
www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...
These people, man. Every single one is a loon
02.08.2025 00:22 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Jerry is so bad at the personnel stuff, itβs crazy
01.08.2025 21:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It was my familyβs 12 year old ford Aerostar! Probably worth a thousand bucks at the time
01.08.2025 21:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Those factors distinguish this case from the products-liability cases that required experts on causation. Those cases lacked any expert at all but required one to explain what went wrong. Here, by contrast, we have two experts to explain the design defect. From there, like the plaintiffs in Bialek and Topelski, Slatowski must rely on his lay eyewitness testimony. 242 A.2d at 233, 235; 180 A.2d at 418β19. It may not prove persuasive. But that is up to the jury, not the judge. True, Slatowskiβs theory of causation is fuzzy. He does not know whether the trigger was depressed by some debris or the holster itself. And his experts neither considered the gunβs holster nor tested how it would have interacted with the gun. Yet all that goes to the strength of his case, not whether a jury could decide for itself how his theory adds up.
3d Cir. revives design defect case against Sig Sauer after (forgive the passive; this is the question for the jury) his P320 discharged into his hip.
Held: expert witnesses cannot testify as to causation, but can describe the gun and let the jury decide issue.
www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/241...
The surplus lines market to the rescue!
01.08.2025 17:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Are you a licensed attorney in Virginia?"
"Well I am a licensed attorney and I am in Virginia, so yes."
This is a thought process only Homer Simpson could have