pretty much - the context completely changes the read of the screenshot so omitting it seems super misleading
11.01.2026 16:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0pretty much - the context completely changes the read of the screenshot so omitting it seems super misleading
11.01.2026 16:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0weird take imo
11.01.2026 16:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It was an Iranian who made the comparison with Harry Potter - should JK have replied dismissing them instead?
11.01.2026 16:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It was an Iranian who made the comparison - should she not have replied?
11.01.2026 16:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It was an Iranian who brought in Harry Potter - should she not have replied?
11.01.2026 16:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0idk if it needed to be permanent but taking action seems fair
07.10.2025 00:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0bsky.app/profile/segy...
07.10.2025 00:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0ban seems legit I meant
07.10.2025 00:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0so yeah, seems pretty fair
06.10.2025 17:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0OK, the context has now been surfaced.. not good
06.10.2025 17:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I'm talking about her interactions on this site...
06.10.2025 17:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βRead the roomβ has long been my least favorite internettism because it implies failure to conform is embarrassing. βPosting through itβ is getting high on the list for the same reason.
06.10.2025 13:02 β π 104 π 7 π¬ 9 π 4feels like this would warrant a temporary suspension and/or warning with post takedownβ¦ but a permaban? seems a bit much imo
06.10.2025 14:41 β π 49 π 4 π¬ 6 π 1I flicked through the posts on the pds with that tool that someone posted and didn't see much to justify suspension, so yea, I guess I agree if there isn't context I've missed
06.10.2025 11:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Mama, is that you?
06.10.2025 10:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Was just reading a thread of the replies and getting frustrated but my main doesn't really get into deep debates on contentious stuff
06.10.2025 10:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0yeah I didn't say twitter was the better website
05.10.2025 21:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, maybe some users' interpretation of the Community Guidelines changed following some announcement - although tbh I suspect people may have only read them with the motivation of the JS issue? (I certainly hadn't read them til now)
05.10.2025 20:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0The Louvre of Bluesky is Libs of TikTok for leftists and it's embarrassing that anything they say has a large footprint here
05.10.2025 19:53 β π 612 π 71 π¬ 263 π 195ok - with "engaging" I was talking about me (and various other TPOTty accounts I've seen get excited about this vibeshift) so that's why I was confused
05.10.2025 20:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Again I don't think that's the behaviour she was mocking - imo pancakes/waffles goes way beyond the JS thing
05.10.2025 20:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0well it's because I'm seeing a bunch of claims to the contrary lol
05.10.2025 20:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0have I mocked anyone?
05.10.2025 20:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Hey I'm not saying it's perfect - bring on the decentralised moderation!
05.10.2025 20:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1(thanks for seeking me out to answer anyway!)
05.10.2025 20:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0am i shadowbanned? :'(
05.10.2025 19:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0weird? it's here? bsky.app/profile/ench...
05.10.2025 19:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Responses to this thread are pretending my argument is "let in the racists and be nice to them". *I don't want that.* Keep them out!
I want normies to come here and find it fun. There are 1m daily users here out of 8bn people. Saying "I want more people here" doesn't mean "let racists in" ffs.
Nice dunk
05.10.2025 19:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0