We should boycott the Conference.
15.07.2025 12:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@nickbrett.bsky.social
CPFC β€οΈππͺπΊ
We should boycott the Conference.
15.07.2025 12:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The great irony being that our place is taken by a football club proven to have cheated and is part of multi-club ownership. We have done nothing wrong at all and there is no prospect of us being able to do anything wrong. Completely disproportionate and wrong.
15.07.2025 12:02 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What matters is the decision of the Tribunal that interprets their ridiculous decision
12.07.2025 13:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There was no solution and there was no problem to be resolved. We are not part of a multi club ownership
12.07.2025 12:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Rules need to be clear
12.07.2025 12:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π
12.07.2025 12:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I donβt believe the club has done anything wrong at all hence the extraordinary injustice of it
12.07.2025 12:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It had nothing to do with the business. It had to do with one person.
People still trying to link this back to anything the club could have done arenβt really getting it.
UEFA. They are the regulator
12.07.2025 12:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You should watch the full interview on Sky Sports ( and also see Kaveh)
12.07.2025 12:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No we couldnβt comply with the rule. We didnβt know we were going to win the fa cup on 1 March and in any event we couldnβt force Textor to transfer ownership of his shares. Itβs utterly ridiculous
12.07.2025 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Fair enough but I think you are being unreasonable given what Parish said in the interview yesterday (unless you disbelieve him).
12.07.2025 12:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Would be better than sniping from the sidelines
12.07.2025 12:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0As Parish says this the biggest outrage in the history of football and all our fans should be supporting the club
12.07.2025 12:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Itβs not an excuse itβs a fact
12.07.2025 12:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We couldnβt have complied with the rule change anyway even if we knew about it which we didnβt
12.07.2025 12:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Exactly
12.07.2025 11:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Exactly. They are the regulator they are required to communicate effectively. Particularly when its major rule changes. Apart from the heartbreak, itβs literally costing the club tens of millions. If Parish is right we should win on this point alone.
12.07.2025 11:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And we should get what we deserve for doing so
12.07.2025 11:34 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0You donβt publish individual email addresses!
12.07.2025 11:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think thatβs pretty unfair. If you are a regulator making major rule changes you need to communicate that effectively. That does not mean sending an email to a Info@ address. Obviously I donβt know the extent to which there was other communication but Parish seems to be pretty clear there wasnt
12.07.2025 11:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs an important point if true. If you undertake major rule changes you need to communicate them properly.
12.07.2025 11:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So sorry
11.07.2025 07:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You are not alone and I am sure itβs not lost on the clubs lawyers either. Forest replacing Palace in the Europa League would be a travesty of justice. The club needs to fight to hard to expose the true nature of the relationship between Textor and Marinakis
02.07.2025 09:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If we were getting thrown out of the Europa they would have had to have done it by now
20.06.2025 20:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why would anyone have any interest in this competition? Chelsea have been crap for years. Liverpool arenβt even in it. Itβs utterly ridiculous
17.06.2025 10:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π
07.06.2025 18:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Unfortunately for Kemi she will have about as much say in it as I do
06.06.2025 18:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Palace wonβt sell unless thereβs a huge offer
01.06.2025 16:10 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Seriously how could you be dissatisfied. Surely you are supporting the wrong club?
28.05.2025 16:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0