Lara Orphal

John Hurley Flavell John H. Flavell is the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Stanford University. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Flavell is a founder of social cognitive ...

John Flavell, a giant of developmental psychology, who introduced the study of metacognition, died peacefully at age 96. www.amacad.org/person/john-...

R-Ladies is rebranding to R-Ladies+ - R-Ladies Global R-Ladies is a world-wide organization to promote gender diversity in the R community

In order to better align with our mission to support all underrepresented genders in the R community, R-Ladies is re-branding to R-Ladies+! 💜 🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ ⚧️

✨ R-Ladies is rebranding to R-Ladies+ rladies.org/news/rebrand...
✨ Rebranding Call For Proposal rladies.org/news/rebrand...

#rstats #rladies

@123simonkey.bsky.social

I had this kind of task during my Master in Psychology, but the papers didn't have to be "really bad". Our job was just to find limitations that were not listed in the limitations section. Then there are more than enough papers to choose from, and it's a good exercize :)

But rap is definitely angry about these topics. At least in French, German and Spanish

Ah, or maybe I remember www.youtube.com/@FrankWatkin... having some covid-related balads

I would expect this more from rap and punkrock?

@123simonkey.bsky.social :)

I thought that developing effective mood-alleviating exercises for people with mood disorders might take more time and money 🙈

@123simonkey.bsky.social

I think it depends on studies? The idea is usually to take fake news from fact-checking websites, and real news headlines, but then ideally you'd still pre-test them on credibility/plausibility so that it's approximately balanced. I think that some studies might skip this step?

And the skepticism that appears in studies could (partly?) be an artefact of the experimental setting? If you ask people about accuracy, they can react extra-skeptically. Way more than when they're just scrolling online. It's a bit like a vigilance-prompt.

Yes, and it's reassuring that this method works. It would fail if people didn't use their knowledge (or had really little), or if fake news were as convincing as real ones. The two things can be independent, I think? If fake news get too realistic, your background knowledge becomes useless.

My first thought was "good; bc if not, it would indicate that people know nothing about the world"? On second thought, it could also have meant that fake news were as convincing as true ones. So, people have some knowledge, and / or fake news still seem a bit less true? Hope it stays that way.

schlafwissen.net
For what it's worth, this is the website of the people I mentioned

So maybe there are more sociologists (epistemiologists?) who study this

Just heard a talk about sleep research from this perspective, given by a "sociologist of knowledge" (freely translated this from her german title)

Random thought, but if they save it, I'd really like to see the Wahl-O-Mat data. Like how frequently the statements are chosen vs. rejected, and what topics people weigh as most important.

Come on, no one reads the second graph

Why does @weare.rladies.org have less than 1000 followers? We can do better than this #rstats folks. It is a terrific account to follow because every week not only we get to know a new member of the #RLadies community but we also get to read their R favorites, tips, and jokes.

Happy Marie Skłodowska Curie Rejection Day for those who celebrate!🤓 And for those selected, first, congrats! second, tell me your secrets 🧐

convo that made me ponder

- If you accepted to have a more superficial understanding, you wouldn't have this problem.
- "Superficial" and "understanding" don't make sense next to each other. It's an oxymoron.
- Exactly, that's your problem.

I can never read HPMOR often enough :3

Weird. Reference? 🙊

Fav sentence of the day: "Reviewers will see your study and say, I'm not studying that shit, it's already 11pm, everyone else is sleeping and nobody pays me"

I'll leave this quote anonymous

Really? I never saw one without it

Or they want to be really really really safe and avoid all risks, even the quasi inexistent ones

Where's the palta

For sure. I don't think the contrary. You're attacking your own strawman & I'm not sure why.

This is actually nice even for other disciplines