Zack Albert

Bold strategy to tell everyone to pay attention to the rallies specifically designed to draw attention to your party’s unpopular abuses of power.

Probably not exactly what you’re after, but on voteview you can search by member name and see which ideological bin they fall into relative to party/chamber. My students had fun with it yesterday.

Really cool feeling to open a box of your own book! For sale starting august 26.

www.pennpress.org/978151282802...

I’m just a simple guy begging Google Docs to not log me out when I’m in the middle of typing a sentence

Congrats! Well-deserved

Are small donors the solution to democracy’s problems? | Brookings Campaign finance regimes that increase the number of small donors may not be a solution to America's democracy woes.

With @raylaraja.bsky.social: Are small donors the solution to democracy’s problems? www.brookings.edu/articles/are...

Could easily replace “academics” with “partisans” and explain a lot about politics

Worth noting this is due mostly to people thinking he isn’t serious or disciplined enough to stick to one of his most sincere, central policy goals. Which is one of the many reasons these tariffs will only have negative effects

Very cool stuff! I find similar results when I look at more traditional forms of engagement (think tank hiring and event participant patterns) in my book. Love the idea of podcasts as data. Looking forward to seeing more!

Really cool stuff. Love when there’s a paper to cite for something I’ve long thought to be true

Awesome, thanks!

Love this idea. Any idea how to implement in R? Wasn’t able to find much with a quick look

Need some parenting advice. My four year old has been rampaging through the house smashing things with a baseball bat. He finally agreed to pause for 90 days. My instinct is to lavishly praise him for his foresight and restraint. But what would you do?

“No other president would’ve done it” is the truest thing he’s ever said

I bounce back and forth (much like trump on tariffs) between “there is no plan” and “the plan is self-enrichment via market manipulation”. The truth is probably that trump is dumb and likes tariffs (no plan) + those around him see opportunities in that to make money

I agree. But also worth noting that it’s actually a large shift in today’s political terrain

I’m sure everyone will have a different favorite but “definition” really stands out to me

Really interesting. Is there a paper associated with this?

Don’t forget Willy!

The obsession with tariffs actually makes a lot more sense if this was the ultimate goal

Why can’t we have nice things (planned cap increases that don’t get derailed by pandemics or idiotic policies)?

Political scientists' statement on recent events Please use this form to add your signature to the following statement. Note that we are only soliciting signatures from individuals with PhDs in political science. We, the undersigned, are political ...

Are you a PhD in Political Science? #polisky Have you signed the statement against basic changes to government and democracy? 1200 people have signed (ranging in many ideologies). If you wish to sign, go here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F....

Political scientists' statement on recent events Please use this form to add your signature to the following statement. Note that we are only soliciting signatures from individuals with PhDs in political science. We, the undersigned, are political ...

Political scientists: please consider signing, and sharing with other political scientists, this petition, which expresses urgent concerns about threats to the balance of powers in the U.S. today. Hundreds have already signed.

The Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, a great org, asks individuals & orgs to sign their letter requesting Congress act to restore data that has been removed & ensure a similar purge does not reoccur.
#EconSky #PolicySky #sociology #PoliSky
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

I should say I love working with pro editors and what they do is important. But we need to acknowledge an asymmetry here: while responsible outlets strive for objectivity, others are lying about "$50 million for Gaza condoms" and framing Trump's assault on the Constitution as a normal corrective

One thing that came into clearer focus writing this is how the editorial norm of objectivity fits uneasily with this moment. Striving for objectivity is good! But in practice it leads to contrived statements that understate reality (e.g. "clearly illegal" -> "appear to be illegal according to...")

Trump’s administration seems chaotic, but he’s drawing directly from Project 2025 playbook Many of Trump’s executive orders mirror plans laid out in Project 2025, a conservative policy plan developed in part by the Heritage Foundation.

New piece today in @theconversation.com on how the Project 2025 playbook is guiding Trump's early actions and how the Heritage Foundation is cashing in on decades of subsidizing the GOP (and Trump in particular)

theconversation.com/trumps-admin...

Not at all the most important part but note how the “$50 million on condoms to hamas” lie is suddenly “$100 million”

Ok but why have colleagues been doing this in meetings for a decade?

The caricature that Republicans painted of Biden lawlessness isn’t even 1/10th of the actual lawlessness of the *first 9 days* of Trump 2.0