George Zalepa's Avatar

George Zalepa

@georgedavid.bsky.social

Art | Law | JSQCA | Technology | Safe Streets Resident of JerseyCity | Partner at Greenberg Traurig | Artist at Mana Contemporary | Board Member at JSQCA, StreetsPAC NJ and SafeStreetsJC

99 Followers  |  103 Following  |  56 Posts  |  Joined: 12.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by George Zalepa (@georgedavid.bsky.social)

Video thumbnail

Hello world!

jct.rbw.sh is a map of @jerseycity.bsky.social property tax payments

24.02.2026 04:13 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

"Shared" Plaza..."Vehicles/Pedestrians" πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

22.01.2026 23:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
A Longtime Vision for Jersey City’s Bergen Arches Faces New Questions After NJ Transit Plan | Jersey Digs A newly announced transitway proposal from NJ Transit has raised fresh questions about whether Jersey City’s long-envisioned Bergen Arches greenway will move forward alongside transit plans.

Lack of intel and transparency here is disheartening. That BAPC is equally uncertain does not bode well. Most concerned about, "asphalt the entire stretch for vehicular traffic" which has been proposed in the past and I thought we moved on from. jerseydigs.com/bergen-arche...

22.01.2026 18:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Streets PAC NJ

🚨 This is our moment.

For the first time in years, we can elect a council majority that actually supports safe streets.

Solomon and his slate can finish the jobβ€”but only with your help.

Every dollar counts: streetspacnj.org/donate

15.11.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

!! Congrats!

19.02.2025 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

BTW, @amywilson.bsky.social and the rest of the newsletter is great (please subscribe and support!), but the Newark Ave. misinformation that Boggiano and others put out there rankles me. 10/10

17.02.2025 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But...that will be offset directly by the assessment. It's not a 100% win for them, that is why they oppose it. IMO their behavior is self-serving and reprehensible given the minimal community investment here. 9/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The new SID would have none of the easily identifiable value to PB. Instead it eats directly into their profitability. That is, they certainly will get an econonmic benefit in property value increases, even if tangential. 8/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No wonder PB does not raise a stink about the 88/month sanitation service: their benefits outweight their costs significantly. I should pause here to note that PB is a MAJOR contributor of trash and clutter on the sidewalk as evidenced by SeeClickFix. 7/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

These are all BENEFITS that PB is getting a significant discount due to larger entities footing the bill via larger assessments. (For example, one tower of Journal Squared paid 36x PB in 2024, $38,351.43) 6/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Are we to believe that assessment would break the bank of a 140 million dollar enteprise? Give me a break. So what's going on? IMO, PB's $1,061 assessment is not really a tax. It covers daily cleaning of their storefront, new plants, etc. 5/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, we don't have the % that will be applied, but lets look at the existing JSQ SID asssement which should be close. In 2024, PB paid the JSQ SID $1061. That's right, $88/month. Even if you doubled the %, the new SID assesement would be 2k/year 4/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So to be clear: "Patel Brothers" is not a savior, it is a multi-million dollar money-making machine. So what about the extra SID assessment? Surely, it must be significant if they are so vehemently opposed? Right? 3/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's not a franchise either,all revenue goes to the Patel family. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's important to call it like it is. They have no public revenue data, but in 2017 it was reported that they operate a "$140-million enterprise." 2/10

17.02.2025 15:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Re: Patel Bros.: they are neither a small local business nor at risk of significant taxation. Their position is much more gross. First, PB is a grocery store chain. They have over 50 stores in 20 states and are growing. 🧡 1/10

17.02.2025 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

What I say to the haters

13.02.2025 02:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

If you drive your kid to school in an urban area you should find legal parking regardless of the distance and plan your commute accordingly

11.02.2025 20:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Finally some recognition! πŸ˜‚

02.02.2025 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

🎢 I'm special (special)
So special (special) 🎢

31.01.2025 21:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

New anti-Boggiano ad just dropped πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

03.01.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

TFW you find an old (20 years πŸ˜³πŸ‘΄πŸ») sketchbook hiding in a drawer

#sketch #sketchbook #drawing #art

29.12.2024 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

AND a 300 day duolingo streak…

23.12.2024 13:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Does anyone ever think β€œthank god this app has an in-app browser instead of my usual one?”

20.12.2024 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Not positive who is behind this survey 🧐

07.12.2024 22:46 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a video of a wrestling match on make a gif .com ALT: a video of a wrestling match on make a gif .com

* the ghost of Chevron deference enters the chat *

16.11.2024 02:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My thoughts go out to the person who had to type out these words and finalize this design. I'm searching for a hidden message calling for help.

15.11.2024 23:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed. I think it's lockstep with JC political set working together to exert their influence as the largest municipality in HC and one of the biggest in NJ. Would love to see congestion pricing rolled out in the first 100 days.

15.11.2024 23:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

All that being said, using SIDs like this is better than our current approach of doing nothing.

15.11.2024 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, I do have some concerns about porting traditional tax-based projects (esp. infrastructure) to more localized SIDs. I worry that would shift the implementation of traditional projects to more affluent areas and further divides across the city.

15.11.2024 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

*DMC. I don't want to see the DNC maintain an art walk or a transit line these days...

15.11.2024 22:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0