If someone is retired and earns 51% from their pension and 49% from their farm, theyβre now a farmer. Find a different angle! There are plenty to choose from!
25.10.2025 04:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@nme365.bsky.social
If someone is retired and earns 51% from their pension and 49% from their farm, theyβre now a farmer. Find a different angle! There are plenty to choose from!
25.10.2025 04:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Neither of those statements are true, nor are they analogous to anything Iβve said.
25.10.2025 04:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0eat shit tbh
25.10.2025 04:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thereβs a lot of valid things to criticize Platner for, but you discredit yourself by focusing on dumb shit like this.
25.10.2025 03:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm familiar with the definition! It seems possible that it applies, but even if it does, that doesnβt mean heβs wrong to say heβs a βfarmer.β
25.10.2025 03:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Maybe not, but that doesn't mean that isn't the ultimate goal. It's a small business he acquired relatively recently, so it's not uncommon for take home earnings to be limited.
24.10.2025 21:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Money from the business is still going into their household.
And again, even if you classify it as a hobby farm, that doesn't make him not a farmer.
Ok, so the household is taking income from the business for "their labor"? This just seems like semantics at this point.
24.10.2025 21:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I don't know enough about the economics of oyster farming to say one way or the other. I believe he has other sources of income, but that alone doesn't make it a hobby farm.
Whether this is impacted by his senate run is beside the point.
The claim was that the didnβt take *any* income from the oyster farm. I havenβt seen anything to support that. I also havenβt any support for your claim heβs βnot living off of it.β All I see is speculation and supposition.
24.10.2025 21:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβm pretty sure he does take income from the business in one form or another.
Selling some of his oysters to his momβs restaurant doesnβt make it a hobby farm.
β¦what
24.10.2025 20:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That's a fair read. I think there's probably also a read that makes at least some room for the role of Jeffries' agency.
24.10.2025 19:25 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That is inaccurate. He worked for an oyster farm (that was not owned by his parents), acquired it, and that farm apparently sells oysters to his mom's nearby restaurant (among others).
24.10.2025 18:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I would also say that virtually all farmers farm out of choice. This isn't the USSR.
24.10.2025 18:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That isn't necessarily true of hobby farmers, and you still haven't justified why that term even applies.
His mother's restaurant buys his farm's product.
I never said this is "exactly the same as what your grandfather did." Your grandfather was not the world's only farmer!
Reggie Jackson was a professional ballplayer, so yes, I do see the distinction. I do not see your point, however.
24.10.2025 18:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I donβt see why this term applies, but the thing about hobby farms is that they are also farms!
24.10.2025 18:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That seems like an absurdly restrictive definition. Small farms are still farms. The people that run them are farmers, by definition!
24.10.2025 17:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That's a fair comment, although those numbers still throw cold water on the idea that Mamdani has cracked the code for Democratic electoral success. The most optimistic read is that a candidate like Mamdani isn't necessarily DOA.
24.10.2025 17:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0He criticized Mamdani's defense of "globalize the intifada," and Mamdani then clarified his position on the term. That was the extent of that whole drama.
I'm not sure what Dem reps were saying, but you're reaching if you're trying to blame him for things other people said.
People will draw conclusions from just about anything, but that doesn't mean those conclusions are worth taking seriously.
You need to be in the majority to censure people. Emphasizing public safety is one of the most bland and anodyne things you can say during a mayoral race.
He can't avoid getting asked about it because he talks to the press all the time as speaker, but he's entitled to endorse at a time of his choosing just like everyone else.
I'm not sure what "pot shots" you're referencing, but he's been praising him for quite a while now.
I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here. He endorsed him before voting started, there is nothing whatsoever sinister about that.
24.10.2025 16:59 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0When did his endorsement "matter" according to you, and why?
24.10.2025 16:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0He was cagey because he didn't want to announce his endorsement then. It's very straightforward and not sinister at all.
Endorsements are timed deliberately, so obviously he's not just going to blurt it out when he get's asked...
Too little too late? Do you think Mamdani's going to lose?
24.10.2025 16:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0get a grip, respectfully
24.10.2025 16:47 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0