Lizzie Taylor

#TimWalz says ‘This will end when enough Americans say this will end.’
Yes, please, let that be soon.

In an era of great power rivalry, Canada is choosing to be principled and pragmatic. To name reality, to act together, and to build what we claim to believe in.

Photo of Prime Minister Carney speaking at a podium in Davos, Switzerland. A quote from his speech is edited on top: “WHEN THE RULES NO LONGER PROTECT YOU, YOU MUST PROTECT YOURSELF. BUT LET US BE CLEAR-EYED ABOUT WHERE THIS LEADS. A WORLD OF FORTRESSES WILL BE POORER, MORE FRAGILE, AND LESS SUSTAINABLE.”

We can build walls or we can be more ambitious — and build something better, stronger, and more just.

Leaked WhatsApp Messages Show Labour MPs Demanding Government Leaves X Exclusive: Leaked WhatsApp messages show Labour MPs urging the government to leave X, arguing that it should 'show direction to others in the UK'.

Exclusive from @zoecrowther.bsky.social: Leaked WhatsApp messages show Labour MPs urging the government to leave X, arguing that it should "show direction to others in the UK" www.politicshome.com/news/article...

‘Establish a Culture of Trust’ was the headline.
Trust in the #womenbishops settlement went years ago, because @churchofengland.org leaders turned a blind eye to the lack of compliance with the agreed terms.

Now there’s a generation of male clergy who know they can get away with it.

#NotEqualYet

I wish the @churchtimes.bsky.social was better informed editorially, about the unaddressed problems & lack of compliance with the terms of 2014 settlement. I hoped that would improve over the last year or so. But Katie Stock’s article -even the headline & subheading were uninformed.
#NotEqualYet

Women in the Church: What do ‘micro-aggressions’ mean? Bishop Mullally identified a problem that many women encounter, writes Lorraine Cavanagh

Lorraine Cavanagh in the Church Times on #Microaggressions in the @churchofengland.org.
#ItDoesntWorkForUs #NotEqualYet
#InstitutionalSexism.

www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/202...

Thank you to our amazing team of volunteers, who give up their time and work so hard for integrity and accountability in the @churchofengland.org
Go @watch-notequalyet.bsky.social !

Thank you to our amazing team of volunteers, who give up their time and work so hard for integrity and accountability in the @churchofengland.org
Go @watch-notequalyet.bsky.social !

Clergy agreed to abide by the things listed below, as part of the 2014 Settlement on #womenbishops.
It was agreed that trust would play a big part in how arrangements would work.
@churchofengland.org clergy were trusted by Parliament to ensure these things.
That trust is destroyed.

5. All the things listed in 4. were things clergy agreed to abide by, as part of the 2014 Settlement on #womenbishops. It was agreed that trust would play a big part in how arrangements would work. @churchofengland.org clergy were trusted by Parliament to ensure these things.
That trust is destroyed

4. When was their PCC Resolution to exclude women from various roles passed?
When has it been reviewed?
Was the wider church community consulted before each meeting about it?
Has the PCC accurately ‘signalled the wish of the parish’ on this (not their own wish), as required?

3.Here’s an example for this week of no #TransparencyAboutPCCResolutions: see the website of Holy Cross #Felsted.
Do you see any indication of their policy on women?
Yet they’re listed as a parish overseen by the #BishopofEbbsfleet.

www.felstedchurch.org.uk

@watch-notequalyet.bsky.social

2. It’s all part of the bigger picture of church leaders continuing to condone the information being kept under the radar from the churchgoers, who are at the same time asked pay £ towards their @churchofengland.org church’s ministry.
#NotEqualYet @watch-notequalyet.bsky.social

General Synod question answer says another CofE talking shop is ‘happy to consider’ creating a list.

1. Q 39 was another asked re #TransparencyAboutPCCResolutions @churchofengland.org #Synod.
3/4 of these bishops’ websites don’t mention the word women on their front page. Most churchgoers aren’t going to research further, as to why a particular bishop is allocated to their church.

@churchofengland.org bishops were asked what they were doing to ‘ensure’,
not what they were doing to ‘hope’ or ‘encourage’.

@watch-notequalyet.bsky.social members & others have been asking, hoping & encouraging for a decade, but the clergy behaviour on lack of transparency carries on unchecked.

At the end of the ‘answer’, it says ‘it is hoped [this will encourage churches] to ‘find ways’ to ‘discuss’ their position on women’s ministry in open & clear ways. Again, hoping is not ensuring.

In my earlier post, I omitted the last, ludicrous, phrase of the answer to Question 38 for @churchofengland.org’s 7.25 General #Synod:
‘it is hoped’.
We gave up hoping many years ago. Hoping hasn’t worked.
Bishops need actually to do something effectual to ensure #TransparencyAboutPCCResolutions

Worth also noting that those ‘answering’ @churchofengland.org #Synod written Questions, require precise wording for submitted questions.
Then, here for example, they do not accurately answer the precisely-worded question they’ve been asked.

Who is responsible for approving these ‘answers’?

The @churchofengland.org #Synod Representative’s question asks what’s being done to ‘ensure’, not to ‘encourage’.
The answer only speaks of encouraging.
Lay people understand from this:

‘Bishops have considered it, & decided we don’t want to ensure #TransparencyAboutPCCResolutions excluding women.’

I wish I was hopeful of that.
There’ve been several iterations of ‘guidance’ so far, e.g. the ‘Maidstone Commitments’.
Until there’s a firm requirement for clarity on church websites, just as there is for the Safeguarding statements, it’ll be brazen business as usual for the dissemblers.

Text of General Synod July 2025 Question asking for leaders to ensure churchgoers are informed about any PCC Resolutions excluding women, & the Answer, which actually means ‘Nothing’

Mid 2025: yet more @churchofengland.org #Synod members ask bishops via written Questions for #TransparencyAboutPCCResolutions which exclude women from equality in ministry.
The ‘answer’ actually means ‘nothing’.
But it’s hidden in a word-soup of drivel. This must end.
@watch-notequalyet.bsky.social

Herding 2m people into an area 25sq miles in size, when in they cannot get out, for Israel to implement the 'emigration plan' (their words not ours).
Let's call this what it really is. A concentration camp,
Speak up now. We cannot let this happen on our watch.
www.theguardian.com/world/2025/j...

Jaw-dropping reporting by Haaretz www.haaretz.com/israel-news/...

The whole "if we want more working class vocations, we need to offer less academic pathways" thing makes me furious. We need to make all our various more/less academic pathways more accessible to people from a range of educational backgrounds. Which Queens does well, but many other TEIs do not.

[For those unfamiliar with the situation, the arrogant & lawless behaviour is that of the few vicars who would force this on their churchgoers, not the bishops. The bishops, & indeed churchgoers, need to stand up to these rogue vicars, & bring them into line.]

Screenshot of page from website of Church of England Evangelical Council advising clergy that they can impose ‘overseers’ onto their churches, which the churches don’t want.

@churchofengland.org
#PLF
When will bishops stop this arrogant & lawless behaviour?
If they are getting this ‘oversight’
<< for their parish >>,
then how could clergy think they have the right to force that on their churchgoers?

The Lucius Letters: Chapter Two - Surviving Church by Anon The Lucius Letters: Chapter Two Damon is an apprentice devil tasked with learning to undermine and weaken the Church of England and wider Anglicanism. Lucius is a senior devil mentoring appren...

survivingchurch.org/2025/06/05/t...

Yesterday David Lammy was unequivocal that Israel is breaking international law. Today No 10 contradicts that and says it is merely “at risk of breaching” the law. It is an extraordinary position to put the Foreign Secretary in - who will now have to say why he was wrong, or why No 10 is wrong.

@krishgm.bsky.social Well done with that interview Krish!
@channel4news.bsky.social

Image of ChatGPT answer explaining the parliamentary backlash when General Synod failed to vote to allow women to be bishops in 2012.

Someone asked what Parliament’s approach was when the 2012 women bishops vote failed. For what it’s worth here’s ChatGPT’s answer: