Openvaet / Canceledmouse

Hi.

Your thread is entirely erroneous and misleading, as I demonstrated here.
bsky.app/profile/open...

Good day !

Why do you claim to have left Twitter (while you're still there) or that Cat' harasses you (while it's the exact opposite), Mollie?

Your mythomania isn't limited to one network 🤔?

a man wearing a suit and tie is standing in a field of yellow flowers ALT: a man wearing a suit and tie is standing in a field of yellow flowers

Did you made it up, Funky ?

Oh, it wasn't just one uninformed tweet, it was a full uninformed thread.

How do you care about safety when you're suppressing your adverse events, Bill ?
davidhealy.org/disappeared-...

Why do we have 5 Menorrhagia in the trial and 12 to 25% post roll-out, in your informed statistician opinion ?

Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31) Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried

Fact, this is one of the most corrupt studies in history which you're proudly relaying.

Find an error or stop your propaganda work please.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...

They also delayed the efficacy announcement to deny Trump his political victory, so I'm not sure he would be very well disposed toward Pfizer.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...

Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31) Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried

The real problem was that the trial was entirely corrupt...
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...

so the "95% efficacious at preventing symptomatic PCR" was never observed in real life.

The public certainly hasn't seen it, hence the collapsing trust.

It never measured this, but it did measure symptomatic positive PCRs, which makes the error of people who read the trial of "good faith one".

The way to control for transmission would have been regular n-bindings and pcr tests for every subject (to control for asymptomatic transmission).

Effect of mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing Processes on Efficacy and Safety Still an Open Question

You can verify every source. What you're telling me is that you have abolished your critical sense.

This article is cosigned by experienced biostats, trial insiders, and university teachers. Keep your condescension and your "solid review" claims. Unconvincing.
www.bmj.com/content/378/...

(You'll find nine as it has been reviewed by countless people and I find rather worrying that I'm learning you something.)

Allow me to conclude that your "audits" weren't very thorough 🙄

Pfizer/BioNTech C4591001 Trial - Audit Report - v1 (2024-05-31) Reanalysis of the data and anomalies inventoried

My data is perfectly accurate and derives directly from the BLA documents made public through Phmpt.

Feel free to point an error between points 82 to 112 if you contest how many people received Process 2.
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...
Every source and code line is handy.

Lastly as shown by my above chart, they could have announced the efficacy as planned per protocol on October 22. They waited after the election. This has nothing to do with the filing as they announced the efficacy via press, before the EUA submission.

Firstly, the manufacturing process deployed to the public was tested on 252 persons, so I suggest that we cut short on the gaslighting.

Secondly, there are subjects records missing and the blinding wasn't followed in the US.

What do you call "auditing the data"?
bsky.app/profile/open...

Aside for the fact that you didn't audited the data when you inspected these sites, otherwise the frauds would have been obvious.
Trump did rush the vaccine to score a political win, but we know Pfizer delayed the efficacy announcement to deny him this win 🙄...
openvaet.substack.com/p/pfizerbion...

Erratum, $50k/month minimum now.
x.com/canceledmous...

Where did you pull the sexual harassment allegations in your video intro ? I digged quite deep on the guy and haven't found that 🤔

Dorit, in a Science group?

Are you a parody account?

Reality and stats will still be a thing no matter if you deny them, Funky.

I will need to understand how you can have obtained a PhD while being so impervious to both someday 🤔

But no need to resort to insults because you don't understand the conversation.

Well, I have that thing called "reality", and I do understand stats in depth, so it's transparent for me that you're trying to gaslight me Funky 🤨

Clean trial : aes detected. No aes detected = aes deleted or product different. No alternative.
There is no public here, I don't know why you even try 🤔

It's one of the problems of the trial we highlight yeah, the fact that the team in charge knew what was administered is shown by the deviations and the testing rate.

None questions the intelligence of Sahin or Türeci tho, and its very likely the vaccines did help the elderly.

Nah the only thing you showed was that you had absolutely no understanding of stats whatsoever. Everyone was embarrassed for you (again).

Its basic math Funky, I can't believe you're still in denial on that topic.
bsky.app/profile/open...

Hum, lets keep things simple as you're starting to gishgallop ; what the hell are you supposed to have ever debunked on process 2 🤪 ?

You're talking about that ridiculous video where you had altered Josh's sound and after which I made a fool of you 🤨?

The 6k cohort doesn't detect a 12% aes time ?

Nice work on the Scandinavian vampire, but if you followed your favourite mouse you would know he makes around 45k/month on Substack.
x.com/canceledmous...

Ah, and you forgot to say that he raised 130k on giftsandgo lying on the motive too.

Hum, they aren't, we don't even have a clean clinical trial on Pfizer and while you're resting in Wokeland, integration risks are trending.

Nobody knows about Process 2 being tested on 252 persons, so how could we speak about informed consent anyway.

Can't believe you're pro-children vaccination.

What are you against exactly in these recommendations, informed consent, or knowing long term risks prior to administer it to children ?

Congratulations !
Have you heard about processes 1 and 2 while you were enrolled in the trial ?
bsky.app/profile/open...

What do they mean, it wasn't the case before 🤔?

File that under "common sense" 👇

open.alberta.ca/publications...

@vikilovesfacs.bsky.social @debunk-the-funk.bsky.social @pauloffit.bsky.social

I agree with most of your remarks, exceptionally ; but how is the man supposed to hear you while he is on another network and that you're talking to a screenshot, Copy?

Do you often do that ; if I install CringeHouse I'll finally find where you rebutted some of my points 🤔..?

We addressed the part of "it being double blind" - it was neither, for the team or the participants - as long as they had a functioning brain at least.

After EUA the placebo recipients were offered the active product.

Obviously you weren't concerned by "having a functioning brain" 🤨

Hum, what happened to him is that he stayed a force for good 🤨

You sound a bit antagonistic, for someone asked a polite question 🤔

Why do you think that the mandating of this "gift to mankind" has induced such fall of public trust in the regulators and medical profession?

And why does it trigger you so much to read that they defrauded the testing?