Dani Sánchez (hodari)'s Avatar

Dani Sánchez (hodari)

@hodari.bsky.social

Fotógrafo y/o algo... www.danisanchez.com No he venido para hablar de mi libro pero puedes comprarlo aquí: https://www.danisanchez.com/simulacro/

116 Followers  |  120 Following  |  28 Posts  |  Joined: 07.09.2023  |  2.2866

Latest posts by hodari.bsky.social on Bluesky

Si estás ok y le preguntas a chat-GPT, te dice que estás ok. Pero, si estás como una puta cabra y le preguntas a chat-GPT, también te da la razón en todo y te dice que estás muy bien y muy cuerdo, es un poco como yo, que no quiero líos.

29.08.2025 09:39 — 👍 22    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0

Yo entiendo que si has votado a esta gentuza que recorta en emergencias y se lo gasta en chuches, hoy solo tienes dos salidas: o culpas a Pedro o te tiras al fuego.

16.08.2025 20:17 — 👍 96    🔁 31    💬 7    📌 0

Yo una vez bebí agua, y me entró un aburrimiento...

16.08.2025 20:26 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Multiple cartoons of people casually ignoring genocide. By Icelandic artist Dagsson

Multiple cartoons of people casually ignoring genocide. By Icelandic artist Dagsson

#dagsson

25.07.2025 08:52 — 👍 167    🔁 103    💬 8    📌 3

Han matado a un tipo extrangulándolo en plena calle. La víctima era un marroquí que intentaba robar y el agresor un policía de paisano. Le aplicó un mataleon, que es una forma fashion de decir que lo asfixió hasta matarlo.
Fue el SUMMA a certificar la muerte.

A lo mejor os suena de perogrullo, pero

18.06.2025 18:36 — 👍 1023    🔁 751    💬 38    📌 64

Spoiler: este es peor.

Pero qué maravilla lanzarse a jugar otra vez.

29.05.2025 17:49 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Yo agobiado hoy con los primeros calores porque hemos llegado a los 26 ⁰C

28.05.2025 20:26 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Ayuso dice que España se encuentra en la antesala de la Guerra Civil "El sanchismo está ocupando todo espacio político, institucional y social de manera totalitaria e ilegítima. Lo hacen con clara intención de camb

Imagine ud que la izquierda abertzale dice que Es la antesala de la lucha armada, pues se lía. Pero el fascismo campa a sus anchas y circulen.
www.infolibre.es/politica/ayu...

28.05.2025 19:49 — 👍 247    🔁 116    💬 38    📌 6
Post image Post image Post image Post image 26.05.2025 18:42 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image 26.05.2025 18:42 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Paseo matutino de este domingo. Pamplona habla desde sus balcones...

26.05.2025 18:42 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Video thumbnail

«La repetición nada cambia en el objeto que repite, sino que cambia algo en el espíritu que la contempla.»

— David Hume

02.05.2025 09:52 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

can't believe i'm gonna say a positive word about the chatbots but they all hint at "this is a fucking stupid way to do it though"

03.04.2025 00:43 — 👍 1572    🔁 89    💬 20    📌 8
chatgpt log:

What would be an easy way to calculate the tariffs that should be imposed on other countries so that the US is on even-playing fields when it comes to trade deficit? Set minimum at 10%.
Reasoned about trade tariffs and deficits for 10 seconds v
A straightforward (if naïve) method is to set the tariff rate for each trading partner equal to the percentage share of the trade deficit relative to that country's total imports-always no less than 10%. In formula form:
Tariff Rate (%) = max(10, (Trade Deficit ÷ Total Imports) *
100)
For example, if the US runs a $20 billion deficit on $100 billion worth of imports from a country, the calculated rate is (20/100)×100 = 20%. If the deficit were only 5%, you'd still impose a 10% floor.
This method ignores the intricate dynamics of international trade-such as elasticities, retaliatory measures, and supply chain nuances-but it provides a blunt, proportional rule to "level the playing field." One might implement it in Python like so:

[code]

chatgpt log: What would be an easy way to calculate the tariffs that should be imposed on other countries so that the US is on even-playing fields when it comes to trade deficit? Set minimum at 10%. Reasoned about trade tariffs and deficits for 10 seconds v A straightforward (if naïve) method is to set the tariff rate for each trading partner equal to the percentage share of the trade deficit relative to that country's total imports-always no less than 10%. In formula form: Tariff Rate (%) = max(10, (Trade Deficit ÷ Total Imports) * 100) For example, if the US runs a $20 billion deficit on $100 billion worth of imports from a country, the calculated rate is (20/100)×100 = 20%. If the deficit were only 5%, you'd still impose a 10% floor. This method ignores the intricate dynamics of international trade-such as elasticities, retaliatory measures, and supply chain nuances-but it provides a blunt, proportional rule to "level the playing field." One might implement it in Python like so: [code]

Gemini answer:

Okay, let's break down the idea of using tariffs to achieve an "even playing field" defined as eliminating the US trade deficit.
While the goal of balancing trade is understandable, devising an "easy way" to calculate tariffs to achieve this is extremely complex, and most economists would argue it's not feasible or desirable for several reasons.
However, let's outline a highly simplified conceptual approach based only on the numbers, ignoring the vast real-world complexities and consequences:
Simplified (and Problematic) Calculation Idea:
1. Identify the Bilateral Deficit: Determine the trade deficit the US has with a specific country (Country X).
Deficit_X = Value of Imports from X - Value of
• Exports to X
2. Target Reduction: The goal is to reduce imports from Country X (or increase their cost to US buyers) by the amount of the deficit, so that the value effectively balances out.
3. Calculate Required Tariff (Ignoring Economics):
• If you assume, very unrealistically, that a tariff directly reduces the value of imports by a corresponding percentage (which it doesn't
- it increases the price), you could try:
Required Reduction % = Deficit_X / Value of
• Imports from X

Gemini answer: Okay, let's break down the idea of using tariffs to achieve an "even playing field" defined as eliminating the US trade deficit. While the goal of balancing trade is understandable, devising an "easy way" to calculate tariffs to achieve this is extremely complex, and most economists would argue it's not feasible or desirable for several reasons. However, let's outline a highly simplified conceptual approach based only on the numbers, ignoring the vast real-world complexities and consequences: Simplified (and Problematic) Calculation Idea: 1. Identify the Bilateral Deficit: Determine the trade deficit the US has with a specific country (Country X). Deficit_X = Value of Imports from X - Value of • Exports to X 2. Target Reduction: The goal is to reduce imports from Country X (or increase their cost to US buyers) by the amount of the deficit, so that the value effectively balances out. 3. Calculate Required Tariff (Ignoring Economics): • If you assume, very unrealistically, that a tariff directly reduces the value of imports by a corresponding percentage (which it doesn't - it increases the price), you could try: Required Reduction % = Deficit_X / Value of • Imports from X

Claude:

What would be an easy way to calculate the tariffs that should be imposed on other countries so that the US is on even-playing fields when it comes to trade deficit? Set minimum at 10%.
To calculate tariffs that could theoretically level the playing field for trade deficits, I'd suggest a straightforward approach based on the trade imbalance percentage:
1. Calculate the bilateral trade deficit with each trading partner: Trade Deficit - US Imports from Country - US
Exports to Country
2. Express this as a percentage of total bilateral trade: Deficit Percentage - (Trade Deficit / Total Bilateral Trade) × 100
3. Apply a tariff rate that corresponds to this percentage, with
your minimum 10% floor: Tariff Rate = max(Deficit
Percentage, 10%)
This creates a proportional response where countries with larger trade surpluses with the US would face higher tariffs.
For example:
• If Country A has a 25% trade surplus with the US (meaning the US has a 25% deficit), apply a 25% tariff
• If Country B has a 5% trade surplus with the US, apply the minimum 10% tariff
This method is relatively simple to calculate and directly ties tariff levels to trade imbalances. However, I should note that economists generally caution that trade deficits alone don't necessarily indicate unfair trade practices, and tariffs can have complex economic consequences including increased consumer prices and potential retaliation.
Would you like me to elaborate on any part of this approach or discuss potential refinements to make it more sophisticated?

Claude: What would be an easy way to calculate the tariffs that should be imposed on other countries so that the US is on even-playing fields when it comes to trade deficit? Set minimum at 10%. To calculate tariffs that could theoretically level the playing field for trade deficits, I'd suggest a straightforward approach based on the trade imbalance percentage: 1. Calculate the bilateral trade deficit with each trading partner: Trade Deficit - US Imports from Country - US Exports to Country 2. Express this as a percentage of total bilateral trade: Deficit Percentage - (Trade Deficit / Total Bilateral Trade) × 100 3. Apply a tariff rate that corresponds to this percentage, with your minimum 10% floor: Tariff Rate = max(Deficit Percentage, 10%) This creates a proportional response where countries with larger trade surpluses with the US would face higher tariffs. For example: • If Country A has a 25% trade surplus with the US (meaning the US has a 25% deficit), apply a 25% tariff • If Country B has a 5% trade surplus with the US, apply the minimum 10% tariff This method is relatively simple to calculate and directly ties tariff levels to trade imbalances. However, I should note that economists generally caution that trade deficits alone don't necessarily indicate unfair trade practices, and tariffs can have complex economic consequences including increased consumer prices and potential retaliation. Would you like me to elaborate on any part of this approach or discuss potential refinements to make it more sophisticated?

Grok:

the deficit. The deficit as a percentage of total trade is
$295B/$582B = 50.69%. Using the formula Tariff% = 10% +
(Deficit% × Scaling Factor), we choose a scaling factor of 50 for illustration:
• Tariff = 10% + (50.69% × 50) = 10% + 25.345% = 35.345%, rounded to 35.3%.
This means a 35.3% tariff on Chinese goods could be proposed to offset the imbalance, aiming to reduce imports and encourage domestic production or exports.
Extending to Other Countries
To provide a broader view, here's a table of top US trading partners with 2024 deficits, using data from The Motley Fool and similar calculations (assuming scaling factor of 50 for consistency):

[data table headings] 
Country

Deficit
(USD
Billion)

Total
Trade
(USD
Billion)
Deficit %

Calculate d Tariff %

China
-295
582
50.69%
35.3%

Mexico
-172
840
20.48%
20.2%

Vietnam
-123
(Data incomplet e, estimate)
~30%
25.0%

Ireland
-87
(Data incomplet e, estimate)
~25%
22.5%

Germany
-85
(Data incomplete estimate)
~20%
20.0%

Grok: the deficit. The deficit as a percentage of total trade is $295B/$582B = 50.69%. Using the formula Tariff% = 10% + (Deficit% × Scaling Factor), we choose a scaling factor of 50 for illustration: • Tariff = 10% + (50.69% × 50) = 10% + 25.345% = 35.345%, rounded to 35.3%. This means a 35.3% tariff on Chinese goods could be proposed to offset the imbalance, aiming to reduce imports and encourage domestic production or exports. Extending to Other Countries To provide a broader view, here's a table of top US trading partners with 2024 deficits, using data from The Motley Fool and similar calculations (assuming scaling factor of 50 for consistency): [data table headings] Country Deficit (USD Billion) Total Trade (USD Billion) Deficit % Calculate d Tariff % China -295 582 50.69% 35.3% Mexico -172 840 20.48% 20.2% Vietnam -123 (Data incomplet e, estimate) ~30% 25.0% Ireland -87 (Data incomplet e, estimate) ~25% 22.5% Germany -85 (Data incomplete estimate) ~20% 20.0%

guess where they got their weird trade deficit math from?

i went to the pit for y'all and brought back the screenshots with alt text

03.04.2025 00:42 — 👍 2458    🔁 629    💬 62    📌 212
La fotografía artística en la investigación científica:: una revisión sistemática de la literatura en el contexto iberoamericano | Fotocinema. Revista Científica de Cine y Fotografía

📸 La revista Fotocinema: Revista científica de cine y fotografía acaba de publicar la investigación realizada dentro del proyecto FotoART por Íñigo Ayala Aizpuru, Daniela Reyes Marcos y por mi 🙂
Tenéis disponible la publicación en este enlace: revistas.uma.es/index.php/fo...

03.02.2025 08:51 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

¡¡¡Muchas felicidades!!! Y por muchos años más.

01.02.2025 18:44 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Ya que todas las televisiones están dando espacio a las declaraciones terraplanistas de un futbolista lo mínimo que podían hacer es poner a comentar el fútbol a un astrofísico que no haya visto un partido en su vida.

30.01.2025 19:44 — 👍 1826    🔁 540    💬 50    📌 21
Miss Diciembre 1854; Miguel Leache | Fotolibros | San Telmo Museoa
YouTube video by San Telmo Museoa Miss Diciembre 1854; Miguel Leache | Fotolibros | San Telmo Museoa

www.youtube.com/watch?v=V384...

31.01.2025 10:04 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Rocío Bueno: "Más que fotógrafa, soy hibridadora" - Clavoardiendo Magazine Rocío Bueno es una fotógrafa madrileña cuya obra se expresa en dos direcciones: la búsqueda interior y el compartir hacia afuera. Esto la ha llevado a realizar trabajos como ‘Hilo’, ‘Renascence’ o ‘Tú...

#ENTREVISTAS

Rocío Bueno conversa con @ermutante.bsky.social sobre su obra y las estrategias a la hora de abordar sus proyectos, sean individuales o colectivos.

'Ellas, nosotras’ es su última propuesta en la Sala Amárica de Vitoria-Gasteiz.

clavoardiendo-magazine.com/mundofoto/en...

30.01.2025 16:30 — 👍 12    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 2

CACH: Te vamos a grabar un vídeo para promocionar las ayudas a las publicación, bla, bla, bla...

Yo: Uff, ¿Es necesario? qué vergüenza...

También yo: Lo republico en todas las redes sociales.

#terapiadechoque #promosió #simulacro

31.01.2025 07:34 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
30.01.2025 16:24 — 👍 328    🔁 109    💬 1    📌 1
Video thumbnail

Aquí el minivídeo que me grabaron los de prensa del Centro de Arte Contemporáneo de Huarte antes de la presentación.

30.01.2025 09:09 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 1

Mucha de la gente que ha ido hoy a misa se pregunta si la sanidad debe ser gratuita para un inmigrante sin recursos o hay que dejarle morir.
Más les vale que los ateos tengamos razón.

26.01.2025 21:46 — 👍 412    🔁 98    💬 11    📌 2
Post image Post image 25.01.2025 00:13 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Contraportada de 'Y tú, ¿por qué eres negro?'

Contraportada de 'Y tú, ¿por qué eres negro?'

Portada de 'Y tú, ¿por qué eres negro?'

Portada de 'Y tú, ¿por qué eres negro?'

'Y tú, ¿por qué eres negro?'.

La edición original.
Gratis.
En PDF.

drive.google.com/file/d/1H7tm...

24.01.2025 11:59 — 👍 67    🔁 31    💬 5    📌 3

Os recuerdo que tengo un segundo perfil dedicado tan solo a difundir concursos literarios y culturales:
@concursosguia.bsky.social

23.01.2025 11:17 — 👍 4    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Ah, el otro día estuve presentando mi fotolibro en Katakrak, si alguno estáis por Pamplona que sepáis que se puede comprar también allí.
(Y si no, pues en mi web, que no deja de ser la opción más directa).

22.01.2025 17:52 — 👍 9    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Dani Sánchez

Lo de poner la web por aquí...
www.danisanchez.com

22.01.2025 17:46 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Lo de las fotos...

22.01.2025 17:44 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
a man standing in front of a red brick wall with his hands up Alt: Persona hablándole a una pared

PROPONGO que el like esté más barato aquí, sobre todo en estos primeros tiempos en los que parece que le hablamos a la pared.

El repost ya al gusto de cada cual, pero si bajamos un poquito el nivel de exigencia creo que podemos construir un Bluesky más amable.

22.01.2025 08:07 — 👍 16    🔁 4    💬 2    📌 0

@hodari is following 19 prominent accounts