Integration of imaging-based and sequencing-based spatial omics mapping on the same tissue section via DBiTplus www.nature.com/articles/s4...
08.03.2026 14:15 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0@tommytang.bsky.social
Director of bioinformatics at AstraZeneca. subscribe to my youtube channel @chatomics. On my way to helping 1 million people learn bioinformatics. Educator, Biotech, single cell. Also talks about leadership. tommytang.bio.link
Integration of imaging-based and sequencing-based spatial omics mapping on the same tissue section via DBiTplus www.nature.com/articles/s4...
08.03.2026 14:15 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
I hope you've found this post helpful.
Follow me for more.
Subscribe to my FREE newsletter chatomics to learn bioinformatics divingintogeneticsandgenomics.ck.page/profile
Understand NGS sequencing files
bioinf.comav.upv.es/courses/seq...
I hope you've found this post helpful.
Follow me for more.
Subscribe to my FREE newsletter chatomics to learn bioinformatics divingintogeneticsandgenomics.ck.page/profile
6. Streamlining Data-Intensive Biology With Workflow Systems dib-lab.github.io/2020-workfl...
08.03.2026 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 05. two papers by Titus Brown [Ten simple rules and a template for creating workflows-as-applications](journals.plos.org/ploscompbio...)
08.03.2026 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 04. discussion on biostars www.biostars.org/p/115745/
08.03.2026 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 03. A review of bioinformatic pipeline frameworks academic.oup.com/bib/article...
08.03.2026 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 02. see also from the CWL wiki github.com/common-work...
08.03.2026 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
6 links on workflow to make your life easier π§΅
Bioinformatics analysis involves a lot of steps, 6 links on workflow to make your life easier:
1. over hundreds of workflow tools and engines github.com/pditommaso/...
Fragmentomic liquid biopsy enables early breast cancer detection, molecular subtyping and lymph node assessment www.nature.com/articles/s4...
07.03.2026 15:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I hope you've found this post helpful.
Follow me for more.
Subscribe to my FREE newsletter chatomics to learn bioinformatics divingintogeneticsandgenomics.ck.page/profile
7. Research Software Engineering with Python
alan-turing-institute.github.io/rse-course/...
R version
rse-book.github.io/intro.html
6. Another Book on Data Science www.anotherbookondatascience.com/ compare R and python side by side
07.03.2026 14:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 05. Feature Engineering and Selection: A Practical Approach for Predictive Models bookdown.org/max/FES/
07.03.2026 14:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 04. Tidy Modeling with R www.tmwr.org/
07.03.2026 14:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 03. Agile Data Science with R edwinth.github.io/ADSwR/index...
07.03.2026 14:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 02. Introduction to Data Science rafalab.dfci.harvard.edu/dsbook/ by the almighty Rafa!
07.03.2026 14:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
7 FREE Books to learn data science π§΅ π (not just bookmark, do read them)
1. Data science: A first introduction datasciencebook.ca/
I hope you've found this post helpful.
Follow me for more.
Subscribe to my FREE newsletter chatomics to learn bioinformatics divingintogeneticsandgenomics.ck.page/profile
AlphaFold is a remarkable achievement. It deserved the Nobel Prize.
But confusing "we can predict protein structures" with "we solved drug discovery" is a misunderstanding of where the hard problems actually are.
I wrote more about this here:
divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/post/has-ai...
- Data silos. Pharma companies don't share failed trial data.
- Biology we don't understand yet.
None of these are solved by better structure prediction.
The real bottlenecks in drug development:
- Target validation. Is this protein actually the right one to go after?
- Clinical trials. Does the drug work in actual patients?
As Derek Lowe put it: "It is very, very rare for knowledge of a protein's structure to be any sort of rate-limiting step" in a drug project.
07.03.2026 14:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
And here's what most people miss in the "AlphaFold solved biology" narrative:
Structure prediction was rarely the rate-limiting step in drug discovery.
There's also the induced fit problem.
When a drug binds, it can shift side chains and rearrange the binding pocket. The protein adapts to the ligand.
AlphaFold gives you the apo (unbound) structure, which may look different from the drug-bound form you actually care about.
It was never trained on protein-ligand complexes.
Cryptic pockets are some of the most interesting drug targets out there, and we can't predict them from sequence alone.
Small molecules can force a protein to open a pocket that doesn't exist in the "resting" structure.
These are called cryptic pockets.
They're absent in crystal structures and invisible to AlphaFold because AlphaFold doesn't know about ligands.
AlphaFold predicts static structures. One snapshot. One conformation.
But proteins are not static. They breathe. They flex. They shift shape depending on temperature, pH, cellular location, and what's binding to them.
A crystal structure is a photo. Biology is a movie.
Even with AlphaFold, protein structure is not a solved problem.
And protein structure was never the bottleneck for drug development anyway.
Let me explain.