Conor Sen's Avatar

Conor Sen

@conorsen.bsky.social

Bloomberg Opinion columnist, Buc-ee’s fan πŸ“Atlanta, GA

35,317 Followers  |  181 Following  |  8,674 Posts  |  Joined: 25.04.2023  |  2.476

Latest posts by conorsen.bsky.social on Bluesky

Obama’s Fed picks included Powell, Yellen, Brainard, Fischer.

20.11.2025 03:05 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

40-year JGB yields:

20.11.2025 01:20 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2

Yeah, who knows how long this current era lasts but Obama’s 2012 looks more and more impressive (and even his party still got routed in 2014).

20.11.2025 00:33 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

In the same way that MLB teams know that starting pitchers tend to do much worse in their third time through the batting order, political parties probably shouldn’t run presidents for second terms.

20.11.2025 00:30 β€” πŸ‘ 75    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Fox News Poll: Voters say White House is doing more harm than good on economy President Trump faces record-high disapproval ratings among core supporters as 76% of voters view the economy negatively, according to a new Fox News poll.

β€œRatings are notably bad (roughly 70% negative), among non-college voters, Hispanics, Blacks, independents, and those under age 45. For those with household income below $50K, fully 79% rate their finances negatively.” www.foxnews.com/politics/fox...

19.11.2025 23:44 β€” πŸ‘ 51    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
The Biden Administration’s Federal Reserve Failures The Biden Administration did not send the best central bankers. What will the Democrats learn from the experience?

β€œThe real failure here is not the seedy behavior of one unethical central banker, it is the failure of the entire Biden Administration to take central bank appointments seriously.” petercontibrown.substack.com/p/the-biden-...

19.11.2025 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 37    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 1

We’ll see what happens but this $NVDA report doesn’t feel like it’ll be a big narrative/market mover.

19.11.2025 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Claude got it wrong:

19.11.2025 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

No worse business in the world right now than a supplier for the residential construction industry:

19.11.2025 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

$META vs $GOOGL is a fun one too:

19.11.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

In the past 5 years $MSFT has basically always had a higher valuation than $AAPL but because of how much it's underperformed since August it's now at 28x forward earnings vs 32x for Apple:

19.11.2025 19:47 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

GMTA

19.11.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you forced me to trade it I'd sell vol.

19.11.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

"Many participants, however, remarked that overall inflation had been above target for some time and had shown little sign of returning sustainably to the 2 percent objective in a timely manner."

19.11.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

15-20% chance of a December cut seems about right at the moment.

19.11.2025 19:06 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If they're skipping a meeting the only way they cut a couple times in the first half of 2026 is with some nasty labor market data or a stock market decline.

19.11.2025 19:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

25-50bps of cuts from here wouldn't do anything.

19.11.2025 19:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

"Many" is more than "several."

"Likely not" is more definitive than "could well be."

19.11.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Choose your adventure:

*FED: `MANY' SAW DECEMBER RATE CUT AS LIKELY NOT APPROPRIATE

*FED: `SEVERAL' SAID DECEMBER CUT `COULD WELL BE' APPROPRIATE

19.11.2025 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Sub-$89k

19.11.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Credit where it’s due β€” there continues to be slow and steady improvement in this platform.

19.11.2025 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

This is a good take. 100% endorse.

19.11.2025 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So no jobs report until after the meeting, no cut.

19.11.2025 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 59    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s this inherent tension between the Pelosi-era Dem view of β€œOur unity is our strength” and the message from voters that Dems need to change.

19.11.2025 17:33 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 2

"AI, Gemini, stagflation, Trump, demographics..."

idk 6.5% free cash flow yield for bleach

19.11.2025 17:12 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I feel like at some point over the next 2 years I'll have wished I just went 100% long $CLX and ignored all the noise.

19.11.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 31    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah I like it there.

19.11.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Software in general trades poorly.

19.11.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

$COST $HD $V $MA $META all trade at ~April levels. Quibble about valuation or industry dynamics all you want, that's a pretty big swath of the economy and high-quality companies.

19.11.2025 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I've never heard a compelling reason why it deserve to be structurally way higher than 35x forward earnings. Maybe it gets there!

19.11.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@conorsen is following 20 prominent accounts