GlassIrises

Your argument undermines itself. The Law of Large Numbers means that the higher the sample count the more their average will converge on the true value (which should mean a flat trend, like we see in the much lower qty hand count chart).

Election Truth Alliance - Minnesota Hand Count vs Machine Count As part of routine election operations, a small number of Minnesota voting precincts perform hand counts instead of machine-counting paper ballots to

All of that can be found in their report which they linked in their comment threaded off the first one. electiontruthalliance.org/analysis/min...

Swollen lymph nodes most likely, based on the location. 👀

seen a few play out with family members vs business entities, and gathering documents, preparing papers, going back and forth with your lawyer, their lawyer, their lawyer talking to them, then coming back to your lawyer etc. and then ultimately finally getting to court honestly takes ages. /2

To my understanding, the May letter wasn't explicitly a "No", it was just a "we did all the things we are legally required to". So ETA then sought a proper "No", which they got more recently which also pointed back to the letter. While I've never been through a lawsuit with a government, I have/1

YouTube video by Election Truth Alliance Election Truth Alliance Demands Pennsylvania Audit | Nathan Taylor Exposes Election Machine Risks

It's also a snip from a longer video. I grabbed that for you too just in case you're interested. I've specifically pulled it to the timestamp where the letter back from PA is: youtu.be/veABVptx2AY?...

They do a better job posting to socials, but it looks like the post about it on here was 17 days ago. bsky.app/profile/elec...

ETA explained in some of their posts and videos about PA that to ensure their case had the best chance in court, they needed to first ask the government politely for audits and be denied, lest the courts be like "well did you ask?" Very recently they got that firm rejection, now they can proceed.

This.👇

That point is moot if you don't respect the privacy for the sake of safety aspect and if you're asking in bad faith. :)

The fact I even need to list them, which is truly impossible with any character limit, shows which side you're truly on here. Everyone is aware of how spiteful and litigious this man is.

To name a few:
Imprisoning/deporting: Mahmoud Khalil, Kilmar Garcia, Andry Romero, threatening to do the latter to Zohran Mamdani & Rosie O'Donnell
Suing/prosecuting: he attempted/provoked/threatened/succeeded in legal action against Clinton, Biden, Harris, news orgs, numerous women, & many more

Can you specify which parts of what I said were hyperbolic?

To be clear, in a day and age when a wanna-be authoritarian president is imprisoning, suing, deporting, and threatening everyone he doesn't like, you want people who are actively attempting to prove that said president committed serious crimes to reveal themselves more than they feel comfortable?

What exactly are you hoping for them to show you to prove their legitimacy to you? Also there's plenty of information about Nathan Taylor (Head of Advocacy & PE) in their videos, he lists his credentials often. They also have a few other public members sprinkled throughout their videos.

Fantastic work! Keep it up!

I can never get enough of this magnificent dinosaur bird the Shoebill… 🐦 ❤️

This is incredibly sickening

Not only does Canada have paper ballots, they hand count everything, which is not something the US does.

Woohoo thank you for doing your part to show that even in the red parts of CA there are good people who don't support this.

People in wheelchairs are getting arrested right now in the Russell Senate Office Building in DC. They showed up to tell Congress not to cut their Medicaid, because they cant afford health care without it. If you look closely you can see the zip ties on their hands. #WeWontGetOverLosingMedicaid

Lol understandable 😂

I would say RFK is probably Pestilence, and couch-lover can be Famine

It just occurred to me. That 3.5% participation rule for effective change, if 11 million people were out protesting, there's only ~260 million adults in the US as of the last census. We got over 4% if you consider the people who could get to and from a protest on their own.

This is the term we must use now, yes.

Palmer: Charges should be brought against each one of you

AOC: Raising the prospect of charges against witnesses is a form of intimidation is it not?

Palmer: I strike those words

Today they have crossed a deep red line.

We, the people, must hold the president and his appointees accountable for this outrageous abuse against American liberty.

Damn, it must be true if it's coming from the clown-in-chief himself and his little clownlings. Tell me, do you prefer the taste of jackboot leather or orange-clown shoe leather better? Gtfo Nazi

He can't tell us to be violent or they'll actually arrest him for inciting violence. What's important here is he's not saying "protest peacefully" meaning if you're going to do it so it nicely).
No, he's telling us to "peacefully protest" meaning he's actually saying get the fuck out there.

Since when the fuck is a blazer and slacks street clothes and "I am Senator Alex Padilla" not identifying himself? Maybe you missed the day in preschool where everyone learns to introduce themselves, but I'm just going to assume you're a fascist bootlicker because that's more fun.