Claire Battle's Avatar

Claire Battle

@clairebattle.bsky.social

She/her; all views my own

632 Followers  |  245 Following  |  505 Posts  |  Joined: 29.04.2025
Posts Following

Posts by Claire Battle (@clairebattle.bsky.social)

SCOTUS has denied cert. in Thaler v. Perlmutter. That means that outputs generated by AI will continue to be ineligible for copyright protection under US law.

This is welcome news for musicians!

02.03.2026 18:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 514    ๐Ÿ” 142    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 9
Image text: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO PRODUCE DISCOVERY
Defendants, by their attorney, Andrew S. Boutros, United States Attorney for the Northern
District of Illinois, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 (b)(1)(A), hereby request that the court extend
time from February 27, 2026, to March 12, 2026, for defendants to produce surveillance footage
stored in the decommissioned server at the Broadview Processing Center, and state the following
in support:
1. At the hearing on February 13, 2026, this court ordered defendants to produce
footage saved in the server by February 27, 2026, and requested plaintiffs to notify defendants by
February 18, 2026, if plaintiffsโ€™ IT expert wished to attend the sessions during which footage is
retrieved. Dkt. 163. Plaintiffs timely notified defendants that their expert will attend.
2. Counsel for the defendants informed counsel for the plaintiffs on February 19,
2026, that government contractors will attempt to switch on and retrieve footage from the server
on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. And that the contractors believe it is highly unlikely retrieval can
be completed by February 27, 2026.

Image text: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO PRODUCE DISCOVERY Defendants, by their attorney, Andrew S. Boutros, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 (b)(1)(A), hereby request that the court extend time from February 27, 2026, to March 12, 2026, for defendants to produce surveillance footage stored in the decommissioned server at the Broadview Processing Center, and state the following in support: 1. At the hearing on February 13, 2026, this court ordered defendants to produce footage saved in the server by February 27, 2026, and requested plaintiffs to notify defendants by February 18, 2026, if plaintiffsโ€™ IT expert wished to attend the sessions during which footage is retrieved. Dkt. 163. Plaintiffs timely notified defendants that their expert will attend. 2. Counsel for the defendants informed counsel for the plaintiffs on February 19, 2026, that government contractors will attempt to switch on and retrieve footage from the server on Tuesday, February 24, 2026. And that the contractors believe it is highly unlikely retrieval can be completed by February 27, 2026.

Partial Image text:

3. At the hearing on February 20, 2026, counsel for defendants informed the court that
although retrieval was planned to start on February 24, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., defendants will likely
request an extension of the February 27, 2026, deadline, for the reasons stated above.
4. On February 24, 2026, before 10:00 a.m., counsel for the defendants was informed
of a delay. Counsel for the contractors asked defendants to obtain a written statement from counsel
for the plaintiffs disclaiming any right to seek remedies against the contractors should the retrieval
be unsuccessful. Pointing to aggressive questioning at their depositions and in seeking subpoenaed
records by counsel for the plaintiffs, the contractors needed written assurance of no liability.
5. With the assistance of agency counsel, counsel for the defendants negotiated
disclaimer language and exchanged drafts with counsel for the contractors and one of counsel for
plaintiffs, who was already at Broadview with IT experts. Agreement was not readily reached so
retrieving footage from the server was postponed to the following day, February 25, 2026.
6. To eliminate the inconvenience of driving to Broadview again, the contractors gave
plaintiffsโ€™ team remote access to a closed-circuit camera system so they could observe the
contractors as they worked. However, the contractors did not begin work until the afternoon of
February 25, 2026, when connectivity issues experienced by plaintiffsโ€™ team were resolved.
7. After switching on the server, and reviewing its contents, contractors estimated it
will take about 14 business days to transfer footage from the ten cameras plaintiffs requested to
their hard drives: about seven days to download footage from the server directly into a DHS approved storage device, and another seven days to transfer files from the storage device to
plaintiffsโ€™ hard drives.

Partial Image text: 3. At the hearing on February 20, 2026, counsel for defendants informed the court that although retrieval was planned to start on February 24, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., defendants will likely request an extension of the February 27, 2026, deadline, for the reasons stated above. 4. On February 24, 2026, before 10:00 a.m., counsel for the defendants was informed of a delay. Counsel for the contractors asked defendants to obtain a written statement from counsel for the plaintiffs disclaiming any right to seek remedies against the contractors should the retrieval be unsuccessful. Pointing to aggressive questioning at their depositions and in seeking subpoenaed records by counsel for the plaintiffs, the contractors needed written assurance of no liability. 5. With the assistance of agency counsel, counsel for the defendants negotiated disclaimer language and exchanged drafts with counsel for the contractors and one of counsel for plaintiffs, who was already at Broadview with IT experts. Agreement was not readily reached so retrieving footage from the server was postponed to the following day, February 25, 2026. 6. To eliminate the inconvenience of driving to Broadview again, the contractors gave plaintiffsโ€™ team remote access to a closed-circuit camera system so they could observe the contractors as they worked. However, the contractors did not begin work until the afternoon of February 25, 2026, when connectivity issues experienced by plaintiffsโ€™ team were resolved. 7. After switching on the server, and reviewing its contents, contractors estimated it will take about 14 business days to transfer footage from the ten cameras plaintiffs requested to their hard drives: about seven days to download footage from the server directly into a DHS approved storage device, and another seven days to transfer files from the storage device to plaintiffsโ€™ hard drives.

Image text:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
DEFENDANTSโ€™ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFFSโ€™ MOTION FOR A SECOND SITE INSPECTION
Plaintiffsโ€™ request for a second inspection of the U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement processing facility located in Broadview, Illinois, should be denied as beyond the
scope of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a)(2), cumulative, unnecessary, not proportionate to
the needs of the preliminary injunction hearing set for April 21-22, 2026, and burdensome. More
particularly, plaintiffs seek a three-hour inspection of Broadview to be attended by two attorneys,
an interpreter, and Pablo Stewart, M.D. In addition to walking through Broadview, Dr. Stewart
seeks to evaluate detainees during the inspection. Exhibit A. Rule 34(a)(2) provides that:
A party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of
Rule 26(b):
* * *
(2) to permit entry onto designated land or other property possessed
or controlled by the responding party, so that the requesting party
may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the
property or any designated object or operation on it.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(2). Rule 34 only allows for the inspection of property, not the questioning
of individuals present at the property. Belcher v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 588 F.2d 904,
909-910 (4th Cir. 1978) (reversing district court order allowing inspection of premises and

Image text: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DEFENDANTSโ€™ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFSโ€™ MOTION FOR A SECOND SITE INSPECTION Plaintiffsโ€™ request for a second inspection of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing facility located in Broadview, Illinois, should be denied as beyond the scope of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a)(2), cumulative, unnecessary, not proportionate to the needs of the preliminary injunction hearing set for April 21-22, 2026, and burdensome. More particularly, plaintiffs seek a three-hour inspection of Broadview to be attended by two attorneys, an interpreter, and Pablo Stewart, M.D. In addition to walking through Broadview, Dr. Stewart seeks to evaluate detainees during the inspection. Exhibit A. Rule 34(a)(2) provides that: A party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b): * * * (2) to permit entry onto designated land or other property possessed or controlled by the responding party, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(2). Rule 34 only allows for the inspection of property, not the questioning of individuals present at the property. Belcher v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., 588 F.2d 904, 909-910 (4th Cir. 1978) (reversing district court order allowing inspection of premises and

Image text:

questioning of individuals present at the site of inspection); Curry v. Goodman, No. 02 C 1149,
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861, *2 (D. Conn. May 22, 2003) (Rule 34 โ€œdoes not permit plaintiffโ€™s
expert โ€˜basic access to managerial personnel to understand the operations of the [premise].โ€™โ€). Yet
that is plaintiffsโ€™ goal here. The detainees may also be represented by counsel not present during
the inspection who might not want their client giving statements that might be used in litigation.
For these reasons, plaintiffsโ€™ request is improper and beyond the scope of Rule 34(a)(2).
Moreover, plaintiffs have already been allowed to inspect, photograph, and measure
Broadview along with their prison expert Dora Schriro. Dkt. 68, 73. Now they seek a cumulative,
unnecessary second inspection by Dr. Stewart that is not proportionate to the needs of the
preliminary injunction hearing. The inspection is unnecessary because several sources of
information exist outside of an inspection that Dr. Stewart may rely on in formulating his opinions
including declarations of the detainees that complain about access to medical care at Broadview
(including declarations produced as recently as February 26, 2026) and photographs,
measurements, a diagram of the facility, and 24/7 video footage already in plaintiffs possession.
Dr. Stewart may also speak with individuals who were previously detained at Broadview.
Permitting plaintiffs and Dr. Stewart to meet with detainees at Broadview when they need
to be processed and prepared for transport to a long-term detention facility would impair
operations. Transport is scheduled in advance. Processing can take two to three hours.
Information concerning the date and time of transport cannot be shared in advance for security
reasons.
Case: 1:25-cv-13323 Document #: 179 Filed: 02/27/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2666
3
For the foregoing reasons, the court should deny plaintiffsโ€™ request for a second site
inspection.

Image text: questioning of individuals present at the site of inspection); Curry v. Goodman, No. 02 C 1149, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17861, *2 (D. Conn. May 22, 2003) (Rule 34 โ€œdoes not permit plaintiffโ€™s expert โ€˜basic access to managerial personnel to understand the operations of the [premise].โ€™โ€). Yet that is plaintiffsโ€™ goal here. The detainees may also be represented by counsel not present during the inspection who might not want their client giving statements that might be used in litigation. For these reasons, plaintiffsโ€™ request is improper and beyond the scope of Rule 34(a)(2). Moreover, plaintiffs have already been allowed to inspect, photograph, and measure Broadview along with their prison expert Dora Schriro. Dkt. 68, 73. Now they seek a cumulative, unnecessary second inspection by Dr. Stewart that is not proportionate to the needs of the preliminary injunction hearing. The inspection is unnecessary because several sources of information exist outside of an inspection that Dr. Stewart may rely on in formulating his opinions including declarations of the detainees that complain about access to medical care at Broadview (including declarations produced as recently as February 26, 2026) and photographs, measurements, a diagram of the facility, and 24/7 video footage already in plaintiffs possession. Dr. Stewart may also speak with individuals who were previously detained at Broadview. Permitting plaintiffs and Dr. Stewart to meet with detainees at Broadview when they need to be processed and prepared for transport to a long-term detention facility would impair operations. Transport is scheduled in advance. Processing can take two to three hours. Information concerning the date and time of transport cannot be shared in advance for security reasons. Case: 1:25-cv-13323 Document #: 179 Filed: 02/27/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2666 3 For the foregoing reasons, the court should deny plaintiffsโ€™ request for a second site inspection.

Feds made 2 new filings Friday in the case over conditions inside the Broadview, IL ICE facility.

In one filing, the govt opposes another visit to the facility by lawyers, a doctor and an interpreter.

In the other, the govt asks for more time to produce surveillance footage from the facility.

02.03.2026 19:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 381    ๐Ÿ” 120    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8    ๐Ÿ“Œ 8

The lesson of this and the DEI lawsuit is that if you fight them in court, you will win. If you cave, you are a chump.

02.03.2026 19:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 423    ๐Ÿ” 94    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 7    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

Fundamentally just a very degrading line of work to get on the horn with Donald Trump while he's at one of his little clubs, some shithead chiropractor's second wedding going on 50 feet away, and ask "so what did you have in mind there?" where the question concerns bombing a bunch of foreign kids.

02.03.2026 05:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 936    ๐Ÿ” 97    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 10    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
A closeup photo of a dragon at Chicago's Lunar New Year parade. A blue sky with thin clouds is in the background

A closeup photo of a dragon at Chicago's Lunar New Year parade. A blue sky with thin clouds is in the background

A photo of people walking at the Lunar New Year parade in Chicago. The person at the front is wearing a yellow coat and holding a large bladed weapon. Behind them are people in dragon costumes.

A photo of people walking at the Lunar New Year parade in Chicago. The person at the front is wearing a yellow coat and holding a large bladed weapon. Behind them are people in dragon costumes.

Things are really dark right now so it's important to find joy where you can. Chicago's Lunar New Year Parade was a really good choice today.

01.03.2026 21:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 401    ๐Ÿ” 69    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Between this (is he smiling?) and the state of the union, Trump is just horny for people dying violently. like thereโ€™s no other way to describe it

01.03.2026 22:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1583    ๐Ÿ” 258    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 89    ๐Ÿ“Œ 11
Post image

Call me crazy, but I don't think Trump really grieves for US military causalities caused by Iranian missiles given his history of, you know, not caring at all.

01.03.2026 21:39 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 137    ๐Ÿ” 25    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Post image

We live in a world in which its entirely possible that Iran negotiations failed because people involved bet the under.

01.03.2026 18:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1789    ๐Ÿ” 471    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 29    ๐Ÿ“Œ 15
Post image

Last chance to fill out our audience survey!

You'll help CHIRP & other independent media outlets across the city learn more about your expectations, preferences and opinions.

Survey closes tonight, so don't wait: chirpradio.org/survey

Thanks!

01.03.2026 19:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I don't see anything *blue*, but it's definitely the case that whatever dot I'm focused on appears darker!

01.03.2026 17:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

+ in historically Palestinian ("mixed") cities, Arabs are shunned from, and harassed at bomb shelters.

This picture was taken by my dad this morning, outside a bomb shelter in Ramleh. The sign reads "Gaza is ours, forever!".

28.02.2026 19:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 205    ๐Ÿ” 110    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
The Iranian exiles bar where revolution is dreamed up In a basement bar in Yerevan, Iranian rebel fighters, artists, and refugees gather over beer to discuss the realities of life under the Iranian regime โ€” but they canโ€™t stop looking over their shoulder

Our first story is on Rose's Bar, the establishment on the Armenian side of the border...

...where rebels, refugees and artists alike to drink and talk politics, something that would be cause for execution just a few hours away.

www.counteroffensive.news/cp/189549722

01.03.2026 14:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 26    ๐Ÿ” 7    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

The march has grown somewhat as it heads northward on Michigan Ave. toward Chicago's riverfront. Temps outside have dropped below freezing.

The lead vehicle, moments ago, led a chant of "No war with Iran, no more warships, no more bombs"

01.03.2026 00:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 58    ๐Ÿ” 26    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

a new war in the Middle East, run from the criminal presidentโ€™s Florida resort, sponsored by Polymarket and brought to you by the thoughtfulness and maturity of r/pol

28.02.2026 16:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 949    ๐Ÿ” 145    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 11    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

I had my little perimenopausal 4 am wake up and started to catch up on the DoD - Anthropic mishegas only to find that I needed to get up to speed on a quickly escalating regional war. Super. My heart breaks for the many civilians caught in the middle of this.

28.02.2026 10:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Deeply conflicted, Kushner represents the U.S. in high-stakes negotiations with Iran Today in Geneva, Switzerland, Jared Kushner will represent the United States in meetings with Iranian officials โ€” a last-ditch effort to avoid war.

Just a reminder: instead of an actual diplomat, we sent Trumpโ€™s deeply compromised son-in-law as the lead negotiator to avert war with Iran.

popular.info/p/deeply-con...

28.02.2026 10:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3658    ๐Ÿ” 1329    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 163    ๐Ÿ“Œ 85

really a good sign about OpenAI's own prediction of its trajectory that it is lunging at the killbot, mass surveillance and porn use cases before a lawyer could even read the contracts

28.02.2026 03:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 827    ๐Ÿ” 109    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 11    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Kilauea caldera, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park

Kilauea caldera, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park

Kilauea caldera, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park

#NPS #NationalParkService #HawaiiVolcanoesNationalPark

28.02.2026 03:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Don't forget Microsoft (hedging its bets) has invested in Anthropic too

28.02.2026 01:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Looking forward to @jamellebouie.net 's potential rejoinder as well

27.02.2026 23:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This investigation was up and running from 2010 until at least 2015. We need to know the results. Did it result in any charges being brought against the targets? Why did it end, and when? Did the first Trump administration squash it?

27.02.2026 15:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1256    ๐Ÿ” 228    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 19    ๐Ÿ“Œ 5

Or "My Ever-Changing Moods"

27.02.2026 16:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Kudos to the ACLU and these courageous men.

27.02.2026 16:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Heartbreaking and enraging.

27.02.2026 03:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am so sorry but my brain would not allow me not to do this, particularly when the AUSA unsurprisingly appears to be a total stooge

27.02.2026 03:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Trans Kansans struggle with reality of Legislatureโ€™s cruelty as driverโ€™s licenses are invalidated โ€ข Kansas Reflector The Kansas Department of Revenue this week sent a letter to Kansans affected by a new law, which took effect Thursday, that requires the gender marker on a driverโ€™s license to match a personโ€™s sex at ...

โ€œThis state has done nothing but break my heart. If this state was a romantic partner, I would definitely call this an abusive relationship at this point.โ€ | #ksleg with @crazeywriter.bsky.social kansasreflector.com/2026/02/26/t...

27.02.2026 00:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 13    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This aligns with the core of @wkamaubell.bsky.social 's take: shame on the producers.

26.02.2026 05:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Same!

26.02.2026 05:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
24.02.2026 23:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I don't really know much about either of these acts but I feel like "Holy Fuck" is the response to nearly everything atm

24.02.2026 02:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0