Carinna Torgerson's Avatar

Carinna Torgerson

@brainy-carinna.bsky.social

Neuroscientist specializing in sex and gender. Proud queer nerd.

23 Followers  |  77 Following  |  4 Posts  |  Joined: 05.02.2025  |  1.7823

Latest posts by brainy-carinna.bsky.social on Bluesky

The existence of homeless people is evidence that more taxes are necessary.

The existence of billionaires is evidence that they can afford to pay more taxes.

20.06.2025 22:31 β€” πŸ‘ 95    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Cancer misinformation kills. Chemotherapy saves lives. Rejecting evidence-based treatment in favor of false hope and wellness industry lies is deadly.

75% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases are in kids under 6.

1960s: ALL survival was 10%.

Today: Survival is over 90%.

That’s because of chemotherapy.
Not supplements, β€œdetoxes,” juice, or wellness bullshit.

Chemotherapy saves lives.
Misinformation kills.

Read more in Immunologic ⬇️

30.04.2025 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 253    πŸ” 73    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
How we’re battling Trump’s science cuts across small-town America Neuroscientist Jessica Cantlon is urging scientists to use the power of local newspapers in the fight against US research-funding cuts.

After her own funding was slashed, neuroscientist Jessica Cantlon co-founded Science Homecoming, an organization that calls on US scientists to submit opinion pieces to their hometown newspapers making the case for investment in science.

29.04.2025 16:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

(2/3)
Here’s what to do:
1. Find a cancelled NSF grant in your state here πŸ‘‡

airtable.com/appGKlSVeXni...

2. Find your reps. Explain why this grant is important - & you won’t be silent on it. πŸ‘‡

www.congress.gov/members/find...

23.04.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 102    πŸ” 61    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Are terminations of NIH grants wasting billions of taxpayer dollars? DOGE argues killing grants saves money, but a Science analysis suggests more than $1.4 billion in sunk research costs may produce few results

Dramatically cutting future funding is stupid. Halting existing research halfway through and throwing out the data is profoundly idiotic.

04.04.2025 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œTrump’s actions have revealed the inherent constitutional
fragility of the existing centralized public payments architecture. A nation in which a single govt IT official can effectively commandeer all federal budget activity is a
nation vulnerable to attack & compromise by a dictatorial president.”

03.04.2025 23:46 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 5
Graph showing the FY24 federal budget:

Dept of Defence: $841B
NIH: $47B
NSF: $9B
IMLS: $0.3B
NEH: $0.2B

Graph showing the FY24 federal budget: Dept of Defence: $841B NIH: $47B NSF: $9B IMLS: $0.3B NEH: $0.2B

The bloodbaths at IMLS (Institute of Museum and Library Services) and NEH (National Endowment for the Humanities) show that Musk's DOGE has NOTHING TO DO WITH SAVING $.

IMLS budget: $295M

NEH budget: $211M

These are tiny drops in the federal spending bucket.

This is about ideological control.

04.04.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 55    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

Vaccines have important benefits even beyond their designed purpose. Viral infections contribute to dementia, MS, Parkinson's, ALS, and more. The link between past viral infections and neurodegenerative disease is not a fringe theory; it was part of the curriculum for my neuroscience PhD. πŸ’‰πŸ§ 

02.04.2025 21:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This. Authoritarians win by creating an atmosphere of hopelessness in order to preemptively suppress mass actions that could effectively challenge their power. Every single public act of defiance plays a critical role in stopping them.

02.04.2025 18:06 β€” πŸ‘ 595    πŸ” 159    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

A picture is worth a thousand words.

The administration says they're cutting a trillion in government spending. So far, 2025 spending is $1.89 trillion. It was $1.76 trillion at the same time last year. Spending is on pace to increase by 7.4% from last year.

www.marketwatch.com/story/despit...

01.04.2025 00:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1110    πŸ” 379    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 23

Wow what timing. Who needs environmental health anyway? πŸ’€
www.wired.com/story/cdc-gu...

01.04.2025 18:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
β€˜One of the darkest days’: NIH purges agency leadership amid mass layoffs In shock move, four institute directors at the US biomedical agency are removed from their posts.

On health economist Jay Bhattacharya’s first day as head of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), the chiefs of four of the 27 institutes and centres that make up his agency were removed from their posts.

https://go.nature.com/3QZ8GGT

01.04.2025 17:58 β€” πŸ‘ 67    πŸ” 45    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 7
Preview
Neighbor Tuesday: NIH updates - grants, indirect rates, and leadership changes NIH funding is good for the health of the economy and its people.

I highly recommend reading this because:
a) it has fascinating historical tidbits (πŸ™Œ Ida A. Bengtson)
b) it illustrates how unanimous support for the NIH has historically been across parties and time
c) it demonstrates succinctly how the NIH is good for the economy

01.04.2025 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

New paper alert! The amygdala is key to emotional, social & appetitive behaviorβ€” but how do its subregions develop in preadolescence? In ~4,000 youth, we found:
🧠 Age β†’ near-global amygdala expansion
🧬 Sex differences in apportionment
βš–οΈ Higher BMIz β†’ smaller basolateral subregions

01.04.2025 16:32 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Reminder: the publicly stated reason that Hegseth, Vance et al. - the people who accidentally texted secret operational strike-package details to the Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic - oppose DEI at the DOD is because they claim that it might lead to incompetent people holding positions of authority.

24.03.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1027    πŸ” 347    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 19

The Matts and Noahs saying "DEI failed" and we need to abandon it should be forced to drill down.

Which do they oppose?

Diversity? Equity? Inclusion? All three?

If diversity, who is it that should be removed?

If equity, what inequities should be restored?

If inclusion, who should be excluded?

07.03.2025 14:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1053    πŸ” 341    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 9

The Four Core Genotypes model is the gold standard for investigating whether health disparities between men and women are related to genetics or hormones. Scrapping this research will harm so many (human) women.

05.03.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I can’t believe this needs to be said.

TransGENIC mice

are not

TransGENDER mice

05.03.2025 02:51 β€” πŸ‘ 2092    πŸ” 527    πŸ’¬ 92    πŸ“Œ 67

@brainy-carinna is following 20 prominent accounts