Kevin Vallier's Avatar

Kevin Vallier

@kvallier.bsky.social

Political philosopher (with some political theology and political economy). Author, All the Kingdoms of the World. 9/1 release Book page: https://t.co/iGziQkkYeS

3,235 Followers  |  1,064 Following  |  69 Posts  |  Joined: 13.05.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Kevin Vallier (@kvallier.bsky.social)

Post image

He doesn't need AV to write for him! He just retweets him! (This was yesterday.)

09.02.2025 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The libertarian-postliberal pipeline in a meme.

28.11.2024 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
THE OVERLAPPING CONSENSUS with Kevin Vallier Can politics move beyond a state of institutionalized aggression? Should liberalism be justified by appeals to a conception of the good or to public reason?

4. Does politics have to be as unpleasant & untrusting as it is? @kvallier.bsky.social & I debate

www.politicalphilosophypodcast.com/the-overlapp...

26.11.2024 18:22 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Sure!

23.11.2024 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Briefly, it is the claim that the only thing that can legitimize state power is the reasons of the public that the state governs.

23.11.2024 18:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Public Justification (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

And this seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/just...

23.11.2024 18:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Public justification versus public deliberation: the case for divorce on JSTOR Kevin Vallier, Public justification versus public deliberation: the case for divorce, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 45, No. 2 (April 2015), pp. 139-158

I’ve seen some say that the public reason project in political philosophy is dead. I think this is because its ethic of public deliberation looks unrealistic post 2024 election. But public justification and public deliberation are not the same thing. My case: www.jstor.org/stable/26444...

23.11.2024 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Some tell-tale words for LLM writing: nuance, delve, solid, key, stimulating, showcasing.

20.11.2024 16:10 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

I have been warning you people for years!

20.11.2024 13:45 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Nice. This couldn't be closer to what I'm looking for!

20.11.2024 03:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is anyone in ethics/applied ethics working on when it is permissible to use LLMs in your research and writing?

20.11.2024 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Followed yours!

20.11.2024 02:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just my Substack that I’ll fire back up in the new year.

20.11.2024 02:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lots of great starter packs, but it does amuse me that there’s an exvangelical pack in the first two pages of search results and not an evangelical pack.

20.11.2024 02:02 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you!

20.11.2024 02:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is there a philosophy starter pack? A law starter pack? An Econ starter pack? You apparently can’t search for them yet.

20.11.2024 01:53 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Excellent!

18.11.2024 02:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Who are good people I can follow who debate stuff on this platform? I’m scrolling a bunch and don’t see as much as I thought. But I just got here really. Tired of not seeing it on Twitter. I miss it.

18.11.2024 02:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

It really does seem like the dam has broken and that most academic communities are here or will be soon, and many other parts of the left. I’m not seeing many on the right, and I’m not sure that will happen.

17.11.2024 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

PPE Society is one of the best conferences ever. New ideas, perspectival diversity, high energy, full of friends, still growing.

17.11.2024 07:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

PPE Society is such a wonderful conference. I learn so much from such wonderful people.

15.11.2024 05:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Pope Benedict XVI

13.11.2024 08:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t know how that works at scale. You probably need a red-tribe pope to say it is cringe. B16 thought integralism was cringe.

12.11.2024 23:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It is a complex process, but you have to take the theology seriously and taking people who begin thinking politically from Christ sort seriously. What matters then is reasoning well within their conditions.

12.11.2024 21:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Strongly recommend this YouTube page -

I came across it from Orlando Patterson's lecture, & have listened to Elizabeth Anderson, @tmbejan.bsky.social @kvallier.bsky.social @samuel-bagg.bsky.social & more here to prep for interviews

12.11.2024 20:32 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You can reason with Christian Nationalists. It’s not hard. I talk to Catholic Integralists a lot.

12.11.2024 05:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So cool to be on a social media platform where people are talking about my trust stuff not integralism stuff, so thank you! Right now, my trust work is empirical with Cristina Biccheiri. I’ve lost some confidence in standard measures of trust. We’ll present on this at PPE Society, if you’re coming!

12.11.2024 04:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I think philosophy, poli sci, and econ Twitter are close to solving the coordination problem of coming over here. I’d hesitated because I’m so eager to connect with young people on the right and that’s where they live. But I feel like my mind has dulled with such a Musky feed.

11.11.2024 05:22 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0