Jennifer Williams's Avatar

Jennifer Williams

@jenwilliamsft.bsky.social

Northern correspondent, Financial Times πŸ“Manchester

24,416 Followers  |  394 Following  |  1,921 Posts  |  Joined: 14.10.2023  |  2.4245

Latest posts by jenwilliamsft.bsky.social on Bluesky

🀣

06.10.2025 15:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s a place I came across over the summer but it was in Cumbria, I’m not sure about Manchester. Nothing is getting chucked yet, it’s an initial sifting process. There are a lot of

06.10.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This isn’t helping my attempts to be brutal

06.10.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Goddamit

06.10.2025 15:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thats what they’re called. Demijohns. Couldn’t remember the word

06.10.2025 15:13 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Or are these also going to turn out to be modern classics i’ve overlooked

06.10.2025 15:10 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

What about these. Are we all ok if I get rid of these?

06.10.2025 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok ok everyone is saying this is great, I’ll take it back out of the charity shop bag

06.10.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 31    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

And… guess you had to be there

06.10.2025 14:53 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

That’s more like it

06.10.2025 14:52 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Maths entertainment (first printed 1917)

06.10.2025 14:40 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 2

Think it was because the product was undrinkable. iirc once it had been sampled the rest was abandoned

06.10.2025 14:37 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

😬

06.10.2025 14:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Today’s task is to go through many dusty books I scooped up when clearing out my parents’ house, from a high shelf on the landing. Retro. I remember the winemaking phase, but only because the β€œwine” remained in the airing cupboard gathering dust through the 90s

06.10.2025 14:21 β€” πŸ‘ 70    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 1

Final thought is that I think there will be a strong desire at national level - for obvious national electoral reasons - that Reform councils dont appear financially wild. So despite council tax/DOGE promises, needing to balance the books in a sober way has to ultimately win out.

06.10.2025 07:39 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t think Durham is the worst of them tbh. I reckon they can probably get through this ok for the timebeing with a bit of help from council tax, especially if fair funding goes as currently expected

06.10.2025 07:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right exactly. And I’m some way off predicting that whacking up council tax in the places they’ve already won will stop them winning Sunderland.

06.10.2025 07:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s little to nothing to cut in most places. You can move some deckchairs about. in Durham, there’s a potential move to cut council tax relief. Many other places did this years ago (and blamed the tories) - but obviously Reform’s May election platform was what it was.

06.10.2025 07:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Certainly there’s a lot of that yes. When I went to the last Lancs cabinet meeting (ex Tories) it seemed relatively indistinguishable from any other, apart from flag talk

06.10.2025 07:04 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In practice therefore a lot of these councils are *heavily* reliant on the officers the national party began by slagging off in May - although the picture varies. Some political administrations are more experienced than others.

06.10.2025 07:00 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

We’re into budget setting now. Durham, for example, has asked officers to model on the basis of no CT rises. (NB we don’t know how fair funding flushes out yet.) but it will also be up to officers to say: this is or isn’t doable without eg closing things or taking reserves down to a dangerous low

06.10.2025 06:59 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

Ha see what I was just about to add to the thread

06.10.2025 06:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Do Reform suffer electorally as a result? Honestly? Dunno. Will be interesting to see what gets promised next year though, with so many councils on all outs

06.10.2025 06:54 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

The party obviously went into the locals in many areas promising the opposite: waste slashing will solve this (and in some cases an explicit promise to cut CT).

06.10.2025 06:52 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

For obvious news reasons - Burnham, terrorism - I’ve not written about the reform councils elsewhere for a few weeks. But the general vibe is β€œwe can’t rule out CT rises”.

The narrative, ie blame govt, is therefore already being established.

It’s true (central govt Β£ DOES dictate this), but 1/

06.10.2025 06:50 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
The Manchester tragedy and antisemitism in Britain Synagogue attack comes amid a sharp rise in anti-Jewish prejudice

FT Editorial - The Manchester tragedy and antisemitism in Britain www.ft.com/content/7353...

05.10.2025 18:15 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

TPE is much better than it was and yes LNER is a good whole different experience to Avanti

04.10.2025 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ve taken a new approach to the west coast mainline this year, which has been: don’t go to London. It’s served me well so far. But probably knowledge economy something something

04.10.2025 19:10 β€” πŸ‘ 36    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Don’t get me started on standard premium

04.10.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

😐

04.10.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jenwilliamsft is following 19 prominent accounts