Indeed. If you asked the q βLiverpoolβ rather than βMerseysideβ I daresay youβd get a very different answer
05.03.2026 09:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Indeed. If you asked the q βLiverpoolβ rather than βMerseysideβ I daresay youβd get a very different answer
05.03.2026 09:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thatβs not me making value judgments: people can and will disagree about the merits of the methods. But those are a few of the ways the city centre got moving. What does Manchesterism look like for a soft left government? I merely pose the q
04.03.2026 21:24 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 3 π 0Anyway: big things have happened in Mcr. But actually a lot of visible ones happened by Labour being fairly un-Labour, and certainly not soft Labour. Deals with Abu Dhabi, waiving housing affordability requirements to attract Β£, giving big taxpayer loans to profitable developers
04.03.2026 21:23 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 2 π 1π
04.03.2026 21:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Probably sounds like Iβm always being negative (NB if I didnβt love Manchester Iβd have moved) - but anything like this deserves proper scrutiny (see GMP 2016-2020: not a proud period for devolution)
04.03.2026 21:07 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0My personal hobby horse (atm, but others are available): do we know where the tram is going next? No. Not really.
04.03.2026 21:04 β π 24 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0I think Manchester has deployed boosterism well over the last decade, but it has tended to work because it delivered things at the same time. Boosterism without delivery is just words and thereβs some risk the city starts to rely too much on narrative for its momentum
04.03.2026 21:03 β π 56 π 7 π¬ 2 π 0I donβt know exactly what they saw or where, and theyβve not said. I donβt think thatβs unreasonable to want to know that tbh. Itβs about accountability, which I thought was the point.
03.03.2026 23:52 β π 18 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0To be clear I am not accusing this organisation of making it up. I am saying that the manner in which they put it out then left a huge vacuum, thatβs been filled by politics, which canβt be taken back.
03.03.2026 23:16 β π 69 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0Donβt think itβs unreasonable to expect that an organisation making these kind of claims one minute past polling close is clear about who saw things, where, and what they saw. Itβs Tuesday night, polling closed Thursday night, and some of these things are still not clear.
03.03.2026 22:51 β π 112 π 21 π¬ 6 π 0
This one can be filed under the category of not solved. With @marinovik.bsky.social
as.ft.com/r/11fc084c-3... UK by-election council calls for evidence over claims of voter fraud
Had almost forgotten that was there
03.03.2026 13:29 β π 46 π 1 π¬ 3 π 1This by election will have presumably given massive legs to the idea that you can vote tactically and successfully to stop them
03.03.2026 08:49 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0idk if the slight pivot towards traditional Tory lines on the economy is tacit recognition of that. not every seat is G&D but there was an interesting MRP (by public first) around the time of Caerphilly that showed intended tactical voting - even last year - would deprive them of a majority
03.03.2026 08:48 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Someone take his thesaurus off him
03.03.2026 08:21 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Wasnβt he comms?
03.03.2026 08:15 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs like a kind of rustle. My eyes. One of the more offensive pieces of polemic Iβve seen in some time and I covered the Gorton by election
03.03.2026 08:14 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I have a feeling that the British public are closer to the Starmer position on Iran than this gung-ho commentary suggests
www.express.co.uk/news/politic...
Labour council accuses minister of βmoral bankruptcyβ over childrenβs social care dispute
www.theguardian.com/society/2026...
Stockport: deeply into the ironising phase of its revival
01.03.2026 17:13 β π 81 π 9 π¬ 5 π 2π΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ Ώπ΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ Ώπ΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ Ώ
01.03.2026 11:28 β π 107 π 3 π¬ 8 π 1And then obviously in that vacuum has immediately come the politics
01.03.2026 10:07 β π 24 π 1 π¬ 5 π 0There was some suggestion that the observers were not allowed to raise this during polling hours as it would constitute interference, but I also heard differing views on that. Iβm not casting aspersions, just feel like I donβt entirely understand whatβs happened
01.03.2026 10:06 β π 31 π 1 π¬ 7 π 0Although whether I was entirely functioning as a journalist or even human being on Friday morning is debatable, but I did try
01.03.2026 10:02 β π 44 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Fwiw I was told the organisationβs chief exec was unavailable for comment on Friday, which made establishing any of the above impossible
01.03.2026 10:02 β π 57 π 5 π¬ 2 π 0This story has been puzzling, because im still not clear exactly what is meant to have happened where, or why DV insists there was egregious family voting but the council seems so sure nothing was raised with them on the day (bar one concern, Iβm told, which apparently turned out to be innocent)
01.03.2026 10:01 β π 339 π 106 π¬ 23 π 3Itβs fine Kelly Osbourne rightly blew it out the water
28.02.2026 22:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π€£ that properly made me laugh well played
28.02.2026 22:23 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs fine Jack Whitehall has brought things back into equilibrium by slagging off city, all good
28.02.2026 22:16 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh it might have only been live not on the telly. Ended it with up the fucking blues and half the arena switched to BOOOOO
28.02.2026 21:48 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0