I've spent the last 30mins trying to write a sentence about how hard it can be to write a good sentence.
28.02.2026 15:23 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@drcrmatthews.bsky.social
▪︎ Reading, writing & thinking about the moral foundation of scholarship ▪︎ Author of Doing Good Social Science: http://bit.ly/3EgFA2z ▪︎ More about my work: immersiveresearch.co.uk ▪︎ DM for speaking/workshop requests
I've spent the last 30mins trying to write a sentence about how hard it can be to write a good sentence.
28.02.2026 15:23 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Green Wave is coming but so is WW3. The Lord giveth and take away.
28.02.2026 10:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What a ninny
24.02.2026 18:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Got a phd student who needs easing into philosophy of science? We wrote this chapter with them in mind. More info here: www.routledge.com/Qualitative-...
20.02.2026 09:25 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Someone should design a course called 'Sociological discoveries that changed the world' and record short, shape lectures for YouTube. That could be a great success for the writer and a lovely resource for the discipline. @rwjdingwall.bsky.social know anyone?
15.02.2026 11:25 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This post is gonna age like fine wine. Unfortunately in that time a needless amount of brains and lives will be damaged
11.02.2026 12:42 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Down with Dons - John Carey. Recommended reading for anyone in academia, esp those 'overgrown schoolboy professors' that are so desperate to be respected for their honorifics.
13.12.2025 12:23 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0Ive been away teaching medics abouts doing research. Its been a great few days. My main take away is the false separation they see between their practice and their research projects. Hopefully we've corrected that somewhat, it seems we've inspired some different ways forward.
28.01.2026 10:41 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Anyone else feel like an 'odd one out in academia'?
25.01.2026 06:42 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1Anyone else feel like an 'odd one out in academia'?
25.01.2026 06:42 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1
Steve Borgatti and I invite contributions to a special issue on "Social Network Theory" at the journal Social Networks.
Send us a wide range of approaches and manuscripts, anything really, on the theoretical interpretation, systematization, integration, and reflection of empirical network research!
There are sports where kids get quite routine brain trauma. Obviously that is immoral. Counter arguments never hold children's health, well being and human rights in high enough regard. More here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
21.10.2025 10:01 — 👍 8 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0The quality of your methods is meaningless if the quality of your theory is lacking. Put another way - if your basic assumptions are wack your methodological rigour is wasted effort. More in Ch8 here: www.routledge.com/Doing-Good-S....
10.10.2025 08:11 — 👍 26 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Our Charity Manager - Dr Jane Rowley developed this information leaflet with other researchers at Nottingham Trent University. If you would like a copy please get in touch via our contact form. More information here: tinyurl.com/mwfsm5xp @drcrmatthews.bsky.social @nottinghamtrentuni.bsky.social
16.01.2026 03:38 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0The original was but not the response. Im happy to discuss these ideas of theyre of interest, cheers
07.01.2026 08:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Twitter used to be ace, I had so many positive conversations there, or at least it was the start of so many. But those days are long gone unfortunately. The moment has passed i think. What we're left with is all the negatives elements of social media and not much of the positive
06.01.2026 06:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nothing to do with the new year, but I resolve to have a footnote that is a page long at some point in my career. Obviously I'll credit Stewart Lee for leading the way.
05.01.2026 19:40 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Formal teaching qualifications should focus on the science of pedagogy. But not to the detriment of the social theory, politics, theology, humanities and art of pedagogy. Accepting these statements requires a radical shift in how PGCHEs & university pedagogy is structured and managed.
15.12.2025 12:46 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I think democracy, like any system of governance, fails/succeeds based on moral actions of those living with in. Its a revolution in morality and education that we need for any system to work. That requires a different understanding of social science and knowledge more broadly. What do you think?
02.01.2026 18:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why Things Matter to People - Andrew Sayer
30.12.2025 15:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Embedded in these four books (in combo with a background of decent social theory) is a powerful reworking of academia and society more broadly. How will we get people to engage with such ideas when they are so quick to farm out their deliberations to unthinking artificial 'intelligence'?
27.12.2025 13:55 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0If you're like me & like reading non-fiction on holiday, I couldn't recommend this more highly. Powerful, cogent, clear. Halpin is well read & his arguments are well reasoned. He writes with care & confidence. Very insightful & quite inspirational at time #education #pedagogy #sociology #theory
20.12.2025 16:15 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0The link didn't work for me unfortunately 😔
19.12.2025 08:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Do you see the problem of performance sport? @jackhardwicke.bsky.social and i certainly do. So we put this special issue together. Do get in touch if you have an idea. Cheers, CRM think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issu...
19.12.2025 08:19 — 👍 6 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 1This feels like the start of what could be a fun chat, but i hate typing on my phone (and im currently by a pool on holiday). Maybe a conversation some time in the future? If youve writen anything on such topics please do send links
18.12.2025 10:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I start from a very different premise. Disciplines are largely nonsense, and finding what unites is not only possible but the foundation for better scholarship. Now, getting published from that sort of approsch is a team effort becuase most people start from disciplinary fetishism. 1/2
18.12.2025 10:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ive thought on this for a while. I think there are two essential starting points - a discussion of the morality and philosophy of research that your work build from. Ironing out the tensions there is important but I dont think many/most scholars can do such things with confidence. What do you think?
18.12.2025 09:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There is very little reason for developing scholars to memorise information. If your pedagogy is built around such a thing, and assessing retention, I think its misguided. Helping people think > learning facts.
18.12.2025 09:44 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Editorial doublespeak - when a journal claims to support rigorous methods but inforce restrictive word count limits on methodological discussions.
16.12.2025 08:55 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Formal teaching qualifications should focus on the science of pedagogy. But not to the detriment of the social theory, politics, theology, humanities and art of pedagogy. Accepting these statements requires a radical shift in how PGCHEs & university pedagogy is structured and managed.
15.12.2025 12:46 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0