Nero Wolfe

What—and I cannot stress this enough—the ever loving FUCK

Indeed. 👇🏾 I met John Dean in 2012 because it was the 40th anniversary of the Watergate burglary & I made some lame joke about see you in 10 years and he said something like every Watergate anniversary lasts 2 years until Nixon resigned. He was right of course. #watergate 👀⚖️

From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: 11/7/2018 11:05:27 AM To: Peter Thiel Subject: Re: Dec visit me Caribbean On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:34 AM Peter Thiel < > wrote: Can't complain thus far...

Now what do you suppose that means?

Sacks as in David Sacks?

a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it . Alt: a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it .

goddamn sulzberger on that list has me like

SCHUMER IS IN THE EPSTEIN EMAILS

The last two princesses on this list were approximately 19 and 24 yo. Very odd mix of older and younger princesses from different families.

What is a no-context list that nobody wants to be on?

That just means you have more bandwidth you haven’t exhausted yet. The night is young.

Or even an email featuring a use of the word “enigma” that doesn’t really make sense?

The elephant in the Ruemmler

Who among us hasn’t gotten baked out of our minds and written deeply stupid notes to self? That said, I wouldn’t want this weirdo in the blunt rotation. And I should delete my old intoxicated ramblings lest future generations think I was an idiot…

In awe of how many public dollars are spent on police salaries to pay for time they spend organizing members of the public towards their own particular will, while the rest of us have to run the treadmill of informed citizenship and figuring out how to participate in democracy on our own time.

I’m watching Fox News to see how they’re covering the Epstein developments. Nothing yet, but their grudging respect for Gavin Newsom so bizarre. They obviously hate his policies but are like “he’s so tall, handsome and charming” lmao

Not expecting much from Delaware legislators, but I really hope they don’t fall for it again. Texas is way overhyped and still losing to Nevada.

Acknowledging the K-shaped economy, it appears

need to exclude the mortgage-less boomers sitting on 7-figure IRAs too

I’m sorry, we’re meant to believe that the guy who mentioned groping women to a casual acquaintance and is credibly accused of assaulting numerous women, including a jury determination that he did, engaged in illicit sex acts at the home of his friend, a known sex offender? Color me skeptical!

Defending them from Mom and/or Dad being home for the holidays?

Armstrong is such a POS.

BofA: After a period of volatility, we estimate the effective tariff rate stands at 14.7%, of which 9.5pp is due to IEEPA actions

Not a depiction of an adult woman.

I tend to think he can’t believe this shit, but I recently read a WSJ opinion column on “lawfare” that made me wonder if some of them really are this deluded.

house dems sitting on this waiting to drop it until Adelita Grijalva gets sworn in is kind of insane

The Senate has found a thing they don't like QI for: anyone investigating them for doing crimes (it explicitly waives any claim of QI lol)

Also this passed through regular order via approps, not any CR stuff, so Murray along with Heinrich and Ossoff should be the ones getting blasted for this

This is way worse than the caving being about protecting the filibuster or even the Senators wanted their flights back for the holidays

Public Inspection: Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B) Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B)

CFPB to propose removal of disparate impact theory of liability from Regulation B.

www.federalregister.gov/public-inspe...

That could not be restricted to Nasdaq. Maybe NYSE had a conflict, but in any event I don’t really see why they would invite Goldman as opposed to Fidelity, Schwab, etc.

Goddamn. It really sounds like he had the goods on Trump. Harder and harder not to get conspiratorial…

It’s very reminiscent of the late 19th/early 20th century, at least in the UK. Bookies and gambling are pervasive in fiction from that era, commonly cited as the reason why some young male character finds himself hard up. It’s the same old thing on steroids.