Lily Mason's Avatar

Lily Mason

@lilymasonphd.bsky.social

Political scientist at Johns Hopkins, author of Uncivil Agreement and co-author of Radical American Partisanship

18,076 Followers  |  3,543 Following  |  921 Posts  |  Joined: 06.06.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Lily Mason (@lilymasonphd.bsky.social)

The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.

05.03.2026 13:49 β€” πŸ‘ 126    πŸ” 27    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Explore Financial Disclosures From President Trump and 1,500 of His Appointees - ProPublica Use this database to explore potential conflicts of interest for President Donald Trump and his team. The documents disclose positions officials have held outside government, their assets and their de...

NEW: Over the past year, we've been collecting thousands of financial disclosure documents from across the Trump administration. Now we're making them searchable. Look up names, assets, former employers across 1,500+ Trump appointees and 3,000+ ethics documents.

05.03.2026 12:27 β€” πŸ‘ 948    πŸ” 516    πŸ’¬ 20    πŸ“Œ 48

never, ever, ever, ever accept "how will you pay for it?" as an argument against social programs.

04.03.2026 20:50 β€” πŸ‘ 7151    πŸ” 2600    πŸ’¬ 20    πŸ“Œ 36

My favorite thing is when Diana Mutz goes on sabbatical and writes something wacky

03.03.2026 20:19 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Harry Potter and the Deathly Donald | PS: Political Science & Politics | Cambridge Core Harry Potter and the Deathly Donald - Volume 49 Issue 4

She had moved on to writing about the Trump/Voldemort connection: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

03.03.2026 20:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Republicans tend to like dogs: www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/defaul...

03.03.2026 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Death to prediction markets profiting on war | Will Bunch Newsletter Plus, that time the U.S. pushed Iran regime change in 1953

Is there anything more disgusting than war? Yes...ghouls making hundreds of thousands of $$$ betting on when bombs will blow up girls schools of hospitals.

What's worse about Polymarket, Kalshi, etc. - the immorality, or the insider trading? Ban them!

My new column www.inquirer.com/columnists/a...

03.03.2026 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 392    πŸ” 132    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 7

Oh no

03.03.2026 17:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Kash Patel’s latest firings ousted agents with expertise in Iran The FBI director gutted a specialized, global espionage unit of counterintelligence agents, just days before Operation Epic Fury.

When FBI Director Kash Patel fired a dozen FBI agents and staff last week for their role in the classified documents investigation of Donald Trump, he targeted an elite counter espionage unit that investigates threats from foreign adversaries and specializes in Iran www.ms.now/news/kash-pa...

03.03.2026 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2308    πŸ” 1012    πŸ’¬ 114    πŸ“Œ 129

Sign up for my GRWM video where I spill the tea on Angus Campbell’s INSANE lunch order!!!!

03.03.2026 13:46 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I actually look quite young for my age (130).

03.03.2026 13:34 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Lily that is called VIBE-CITING and we do it because we are PUBSMAXXXING. Your aura just got farmed, let bro cook

03.03.2026 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 47    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

At least that’s somewhat easy to detect! The one I saw was like β€œMason’s (2018) book invented the feeling thermometer measure” which is extremely wrong but also difficult for an AI reviewer to distinguish.

03.03.2026 13:14 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ll also posit that an AI reviewer wouldn’t have caught any of this - because they don’t β€œknow” which papers do which things. AI isn’t designed to do that. I keep seeing folks say β€œbut it will soon” and just once I’d like a legit demonstration that isn’t embarrassing.

03.03.2026 13:10 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I recently reviewed an article that I was very suspicious was written by by AI, even though all the citations were real. Why? The cited works didn’t do the thing that they were cited to do. It was as if the authors hadn’t read any of it. Pretty bad signal to a reviewer.

03.03.2026 13:02 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Exclusive | Trump Administration to Drop Defense of Law Firm Sanctions The Justice Dept. plans to abandon its defense of the president’s executive orders that targeted Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey.

If you are a client of a firm that folded in this fight, you should know that not only were they morally wrong, but they were also strategically dumb www.wsj.com/us-news/law/...

02.03.2026 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1451    πŸ” 327    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 16

Speedrunning all the great blunders of the past

02.03.2026 13:00 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think the truly damning thing about the Dem comms response is that they had months to prepare for today and there's zero coordination, no unified message. Just every D leader responding like they quickly hammered out a statement in a panic at 6 am this morning

28.02.2026 16:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2182    πŸ” 341    πŸ’¬ 43    πŸ“Œ 32
Post image

🚨 Please share widely! 🚨

I'm hiring a postdoc (from Aug 1) to help build a new research program on politically sustainable immigration policies at Notre Dame.

Looking for a social scientist with strong quant skills, familiarity with new computational tools, and interest in public-facing research.

25.02.2026 16:34 β€” πŸ‘ 55    πŸ” 61    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 4

It is difficult to overstate how quickly & thoroughly & shamefully we have normalized β€œthe president can use federal funding as a cudgel to punish blue states & only blue states on his whim” in our polity & society. Yet another thing that would have ended any other presidency in the modern era.

26.02.2026 13:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1180    πŸ” 400    πŸ’¬ 42    πŸ“Œ 17

Huh. Imagine that.

24.02.2026 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Yeah Sean likes to write about things he hasn't read.

24.02.2026 22:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm constantly trying (/failing) to get this point across.

If you're a trained expert in a field, then it may be worthwhile to question the scientific consensus of your peers.

If you're not, the scientific consensus is absolutely the best you can do and it's arbitrary foolishness to disregard it.

24.02.2026 16:04 β€” πŸ‘ 3757    πŸ” 853    πŸ’¬ 54    πŸ“Œ 50

The irony is that this behavior is extremely 1990s women’s diet culture, in which you hurt yourself just enough to look the way you think other people think you should look.

24.02.2026 13:54 β€” πŸ‘ 40    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

these people treat being called racist like it is a slur, and treat slurs like they're mere differences of opinion

23.02.2026 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 10000    πŸ” 2148    πŸ’¬ 131    πŸ“Œ 36

Also that's what abstracts are for?

23.02.2026 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe I’ll just keep posting this every time we learn of another violation of our 1st amendment rights (from our actual government) to remind us of the 152 prominent writers who were so bothered by β€œcancel culture” (post #metoo and #blm that they wrote an open letter about it back in 2020.

20.02.2026 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 475    πŸ” 148    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 12
So, just to recap, we have two random DOGE bros with basically no knowledge or experience in the humanities (and at least one of whom is a college dropout), who just went around terminating grants that had gone through a full grant application process by feeding in a list of culture war grievance terms, selecting out the grant titles based on the appearance of seemingly β€œwoke” words, then asking ChatGPT β€œyo, tell me this is DEI” and then sending termination emails the next day from a private server and forging the director’s signature.

This is what β€œgovernment efficiency” looks like in practice: two guys with zero relevant experience, a keyword list built on culture war grievances, and a chatbot confidently spitting out 120-character verdicts on federal grants that went through actual review processes. The experts who might have explained what these grants actually do? Locked out. The director whose signature appeared on termination letters? Couldn’t tell you which grants got cut or w

So, just to recap, we have two random DOGE bros with basically no knowledge or experience in the humanities (and at least one of whom is a college dropout), who just went around terminating grants that had gone through a full grant application process by feeding in a list of culture war grievance terms, selecting out the grant titles based on the appearance of seemingly β€œwoke” words, then asking ChatGPT β€œyo, tell me this is DEI” and then sending termination emails the next day from a private server and forging the director’s signature. This is what β€œgovernment efficiency” looks like in practice: two guys with zero relevant experience, a keyword list built on culture war grievances, and a chatbot confidently spitting out 120-character verdicts on federal grants that went through actual review processes. The experts who might have explained what these grants actually do? Locked out. The director whose signature appeared on termination letters? Couldn’t tell you which grants got cut or w

Ever wondered how your grant got cancelled? No we know. Some college dropout asked ChatGPT "is it DEI/woke"?

www.techdirt.com/202...

20.02.2026 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1341    πŸ” 524    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 35

Universities were once entirely populated by white Christian men of means. Every step toward social equality meant fewer white supremacist and misogynistic ideas were considered true by default, and competition for jobs grew more challenging. They want to go back.

19.02.2026 23:03 β€” πŸ‘ 149    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1