“Latent demand” is usually what we really mean when we say “induced demand”.
24.07.2025 22:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@jcpolicycircle.bsky.social
Advocating for more effective, evidence-based policy in Jersey City, Hudson County and New Jersey
“Latent demand” is usually what we really mean when we say “induced demand”.
24.07.2025 22:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Let’s please retire the phrase “induced demand.” Too many people think it means that demand is produced out of thin air. If 6 people want pizza, but there are only 5 slices, making 1 more slice for the last person doesn’t make new demand—it just addresses demand that was always there but unmet.
24.07.2025 22:08 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The Charter Revision Commission voted to place five proposals on the November ballot — four aimed at simplifying and speeding up the development approval process for affordable housing.
22.07.2025 19:14 — 👍 21 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 1YESSSSSS!!! I want to live in a world where mayors jockey to take credit for secure bike parking!
22.07.2025 15:13 — 👍 78 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0It's time for clear eyed thinking about the potential for the large-scale destruction of public transit in American cities. It could happen in the next two years. Thread... 1/
22.07.2025 11:58 — 👍 440 🔁 145 💬 15 📌 47The Charter Revision Commission just approved the 5 questions that will be on ballots for NYC voters this November!
This includes 4 housing questions, which would collectively represent a huge step forward for affordability in New York. 🧵
NJ Transit approves $3.2B budget, engineer contract newjerseymonitor.com/2025/07/18/n...
18.07.2025 15:00 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Long experience has shown me that in local government, the definition of "the community" is "people who own single-family houses."
14.07.2025 21:50 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0If anyone wants to work with us to canvass at bus stops on Ocean and MLK so that those bus riders' voices can be heard on this, let us know! It'll drastically speed up their buses, but I'm worried many of them won't even know about this survey or meeting!
09.07.2025 16:55 — 👍 12 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0End aldermanic privilege!
11.07.2025 04:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@njtrainsit.bsky.social: what’s Hoboken’s secret? How do you churn out these technical electeds?
10.07.2025 14:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0In JC, a number of council people are happy to defer to the administration on technical matters and so don’t prioritize understanding the nuts and bolts of the city’s government.
A shame, especially given the fact that JC is 5x bigger than Hoboken!
It’s remarkable how much more the Hoboken council emphasizes technical proficiency than does Jersey City’s. A Hoboken councilwoman, Tiffanie Fisher, put out a detailed and thoughtful breakdown of her views on the proposed budget. In JC, most council people don’t even attend most budget meetings.
10.07.2025 14:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0TIL! Thanks for the fascinating information.
09.07.2025 01:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Youth curfew in Newark? Is this real? It must kill summer house parties!
08.07.2025 23:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Per r/JerseyCity, it looks like Waymo’s training fleet has arrived in Jersey City.
And in Manhattan, Uber has started offering fixed route service. Large L4 AVs operating on fixed routes = abundant, cheap buses.
Are we *sure* public transit as currently operated/funded has a future in NJ?
Taxes that pay for themselves aren’t really expenses. They’re investment.
08.07.2025 18:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Can we please stop measuring the size of govt by the amount of taxes? It’s wildly misleading.
Like, if we didn’t have social security, most people would invest a lot more of their savings in … treasuries. The same thing the social security program does with your taxes.
State & local govts (& unpaid civic groups) do a ton of heavy lifting on disaster planning & recovery, but they will always need backup (staff, $$, info, technical expertise) from the federal govt. by all means, let’s build more state & local capacity but not as a *substitute* for federal support.
06.07.2025 16:47 — 👍 33 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 1But people on here will insist that you can just afford everything bro.
08.07.2025 15:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We can all easily understand that tradeoffs are inevitable when it comes to setting our own private budgets, but some people really struggle to understand that the same idea applies to govt. Sane adults know not to buy a cruise ticket before being sure they can afford rent.
08.07.2025 15:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Very sorry to hear it. For what very little it’s worth, the research fund cuts were some of the most braindead parts of the entire federal program.
08.07.2025 15:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Excellent question. His plan doesn’t clearly disclose the answer. Perhaps he’d shrink state aid to schools based on this quote to NJ.com?
08.07.2025 15:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’d be better if these affordability proposals focused on identifying and slimming down underperforming (ie low demand) programs and increasing spending efficiency for high performance programs instead of just bluntly cutting budgets.
08.07.2025 14:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0In NJ, nearly all income taxes go to the schools. Are we sure that across-the-board income tax cuts aren’t economic self-sabotage?
08.07.2025 14:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In other words, gross taxes collected can rise while the cost of govt decreases or stays static. For example we know that in many cases, $1 of spending on schools results in a > $1 increase in property values. The taxes for spending on teachers isn’t a real cost of govt!
08.07.2025 14:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0People (here, Jack C) complain NJ isn’t affordable because of its high taxes, but we’re skeptical that that’s right, at least in the sense they mean it.
The economic cost of govt = (goods/services taxes fund) - (goods/services ppl want). The key thing to optimize is to shrink this difference.
Tapping the sign. A Waymo operator is doubling the size of the fleet.
08.07.2025 13:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0