wtf? "While the instructions for authors for Paediatrics & Child Health has at times indicated the case reports are fictional, that disclosure has never appeared on the journal articles themselves." who needs fraud when there are medical journals where you can publish *fictional* case reports?
04.03.2026 10:46 β
π 1
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
you mean haven't remade it again? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%...) yeah, I was hoping for something like let's go pikachu, but based on crystal instead of red/blue...
04.03.2026 08:08 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
mein Deutsch ist gut nur fΓΌr "die welt ist schlecht", but I guess it captures the overall tone π
but that is about pokemon go, not gen I & II on game boy color, which is of course the peak pokemon experience π«£
03.03.2026 19:41 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
still, authors recommend full labeling: "We recommend 5- to 7-point fully labeled scales for most contexts, balancing quality, usability, and modeling ease."
02.03.2026 07:56 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
"Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects." - avoid algorithmic content on every platform, on twitter, it is actually quite easy
02.03.2026 05:39 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
maybe they believe meta-analyses are commonly known to be so often deeply flawed that pointing it out for this particular one does not clear the bar for publication in their esteemed journal Β―\_(γ)_/Β― ... but srsly, that's infuriating ,|
01.03.2026 22:06 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
wow, that is pretty cool, I had no idea! thanks! π
01.03.2026 10:21 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
just a week ago I dug up this exact same thing probably from #SPSP2016 or something! but I'm not 100% sure what it is supposed to be, is it a whistle? π
28.02.2026 23:14 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I always hated doi links in references; a pain to find them.
But NOW it is a great way to check for LLM-hallucinated references.
And this, in evolutionary biology, is called a spandrel.
Something that evolved for one purpose but now serves a different purpose (or none at all).
#phdsky
28.02.2026 14:21 β
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
For the nerds
28.02.2026 08:32 β
π 1118
π 145
π¬ 11
π 5
I clearly remembrer how AI killer robots felt pretty sci-fi when we conducted our first studies on the topic just couple of years back 10.1037/pac0000601 π
25.02.2026 11:44 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
There seem to be a whole (older) cohort of eminent social psychologists who essentially do not understand the concept of sampling error, and I wonder to what extent that lack of understanding was an adaptive trait for a career.
24.02.2026 07:42 β
π 82
π 14
π¬ 5
π 3
tried surveymonkey, they have no usable randomization for experiments - only very simple a/b testing and presenting elements in a random order
22.02.2026 09:46 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
OSF
A great new preprint on the importance of pilot studies for the validity of studies that are performed. Such an important tooic, that is discussed too little. I especially liked the section on the need for transparent reporting. osf.io/t968e_v1 By @yashvin.bsky.social and collaborators.
20.02.2026 15:55 β
π 12
π 7
π¬ 1
π 0
Perfect moment to get back to lab data collection! Just today we kicked off a lab building course build on "lab citizenship" principles, where students design and stress test procedures for running studies in a brand new SocSci ExpLab at @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz π
20.02.2026 13:04 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
this sounds really crazy! I suppose you have their PIDs, do you plan to invite them to do more tests?
20.02.2026 12:50 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
if they can fake keypresses and reading speed, I do not see feeding a video of finger covering webcam as too hard to overcome... but it could certainly help at least for a while
20.02.2026 12:48 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The stages of online samples in my research career:
1. too difficult/expensive/unrepresentative
2. too expensive but representative
3. pretty affordable but less representative
4. cheap and full of bots with garbage responses
5. wide price range and maybe full of non-people pretending to be people
19.02.2026 20:36 β
π 38
π 15
π¬ 1
π 0
An interesting Metascientific question is how we deal with deviations from preregistrations. Can we evaluate their impact on the severity of tests? If not, should studies with substantial deviations be reported as non-preregistered?
17.02.2026 07:09 β
π 5
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
despite my high expectations, #PSE8 was even better than I had imagined! Iβm truly grateful to all the organizers and attendees for such a great experience, the much needed inspiration and chance to get feedback on my little #scicom research idea β¬οΈ
16.02.2026 00:18 β
π 6
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
he is also literally walking the walk... for cats! www.justgiving.com/page/james-s... β€οΈ
14.02.2026 10:34 β
π 3
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
APA PsycNet
Once you start thinking about implausibly large effect sizes, you can't stop spotting them around you or wondering how others aren't doing so.
Harkin et al.'s (2016) meta analysis has 740+ citations, but it reports Cohen d values as large as 14. 17 cases of d>4.
psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-...
12.02.2026 15:06 β
π 26
π 5
π¬ 3
π 2
Our lab has the capacity to test ~500 uni students each semester
If youβre a researcher in cognitive psychology or metascience and need data collection support, weβd love to collaborate. We can help collect high-quality data from a large student sample.
Get in touch to discuss potential projects!
12.02.2026 12:18 β
π 26
π 22
π¬ 3
π 0
Leifβs #PSE8 keynote was ridiculously good, basically a live episode of @datacolada.bsky.social ... if anyone deserves a detective/sitcom series based in their work, itβs Leif, not Ariely β take note @netflix.com
12.02.2026 14:00 β
π 8
π 3
π¬ 1
π 0
I have this initial averse reaction to visual perception studies sample sizes, but it is quickly replaced by envy...π€·
10.02.2026 20:15 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
how high are we talking?
10.02.2026 20:12 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
so excited to join #PSE8! canβt wait to meet friends IRL and get some inspiration on what to do with my academic life in the age of AI π
the line-up is π₯ perspectivesonscientificerror2026.wordpress.com and they even got @fbartos.bsky.social as a keynote! π
10.02.2026 17:38 β
π 11
π 2
π¬ 0
π 1
Yβall didnβt realize they were using βDemocracy dies in darknessβ as a mission statement, not a salutary motto
04.02.2026 16:14 β
π 5625
π 1099
π¬ 86
π 41