I had no idea Baumeister is the originator of sex econ β what a prolific author! π however, let's not forget about his co-author, Kathleen Vohs β who knows which insights in plights of sex starved men are his and which are coming from her!
06.03.2026 12:48 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
my first intuition was that it is a proxy for polarization and it looks like it really is the case: www.pewresearch.org/religion/202... so yeah, it doesn't look good...
05.03.2026 21:45 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
PrΓ‘vΔ jsme zveΕejnili program BiologickΓ½ch ΔtvrtkΕ― na nadchΓ‘zejΓcΓ letnΓ semestr.
20.02.2026 20:26 β
π 7
π 5
π¬ 0
π 1
me teaching statistics:
05.03.2026 13:10 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I once wrote about a similar issue - supposedly, making bankers think about their work makes them more dishonest, but in reality, it could very well be that thinking about their free time activities makes them more honest (doi.org/10.3389/fpsy...)
04.03.2026 22:21 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
so they just used a significant effect in the opposite direction as evidence for their effect and assumed that nobody would ever check π€―
04.03.2026 22:15 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
funny - just today in my IntroToPsy class at @iksz.fsv.cuni.cz, I was talking about degenerative research lines & outcome switching to self-reports in power-posing studies and as I was demonstrating both poses, it occurred to me that the effect was only relative to doing the contractive pose...
04.03.2026 20:55 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Never, ever, write chapters in edited volumes. No one can read them, they are trees that fall in a forest when there is no one around to see it. Do yourself a favor, and post a preprint, or start a blog. It will likely have 1000 time more impact.
04.03.2026 17:27 β
π 35
π 10
π¬ 3
π 0
wtf? "While the instructions for authors for Paediatrics & Child Health has at times indicated the case reports are fictional, that disclosure has never appeared on the journal articles themselves." who needs fraud when there are medical journals where you can publish *fictional* case reports?
04.03.2026 10:46 β
π 3
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
you mean haven't remade it again? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%...) yeah, I was hoping for something like let's go pikachu, but based on crystal instead of red/blue...
04.03.2026 08:08 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
mein Deutsch ist gut nur fΓΌr "die welt ist schlecht", but I guess it captures the overall tone π
but that is about pokemon go, not gen I & II on game boy color, which is of course the peak pokemon experience π«£
03.03.2026 19:41 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
still, authors recommend full labeling: "We recommend 5- to 7-point fully labeled scales for most contexts, balancing quality, usability, and modeling ease."
02.03.2026 07:56 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
"Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects." - avoid algorithmic content on every platform, on twitter, it is actually quite easy
02.03.2026 05:39 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
maybe they believe meta-analyses are commonly known to be so often deeply flawed that pointing it out for this particular one does not clear the bar for publication in their esteemed journal Β―\_(γ)_/Β― ... but srsly, that's infuriating ,|
01.03.2026 22:06 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
wow, that is pretty cool, I had no idea! thanks! π
01.03.2026 10:21 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
just a week ago I dug up this exact same thing probably from #SPSP2016 or something! but I'm not 100% sure what it is supposed to be, is it a whistle? π
28.02.2026 23:14 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I always hated doi links in references; a pain to find them.
But NOW it is a great way to check for LLM-hallucinated references.
And this, in evolutionary biology, is called a spandrel.
Something that evolved for one purpose but now serves a different purpose (or none at all).
#phdsky
28.02.2026 14:21 β
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
For the nerds
28.02.2026 08:32 β
π 1126
π 147
π¬ 11
π 5
I clearly remembrer how AI killer robots felt pretty sci-fi when we conducted our first studies on the topic just couple of years back 10.1037/pac0000601 π
25.02.2026 11:44 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
There seem to be a whole (older) cohort of eminent social psychologists who essentially do not understand the concept of sampling error, and I wonder to what extent that lack of understanding was an adaptive trait for a career.
24.02.2026 07:42 β
π 85
π 14
π¬ 5
π 3
tried surveymonkey, they have no usable randomization for experiments - only very simple a/b testing and presenting elements in a random order
22.02.2026 09:46 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
OSF
A great new preprint on the importance of pilot studies for the validity of studies that are performed. Such an important tooic, that is discussed too little. I especially liked the section on the need for transparent reporting. osf.io/t968e_v1 By @yashvin.bsky.social and collaborators.
20.02.2026 15:55 β
π 12
π 7
π¬ 1
π 0
Perfect moment to get back to lab data collection! Just today we kicked off a lab building course build on "lab citizenship" principles, where students design and stress test procedures for running studies in a brand new SocSci ExpLab at @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz π
20.02.2026 13:04 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
this sounds really crazy! I suppose you have their PIDs, do you plan to invite them to do more tests?
20.02.2026 12:50 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
if they can fake keypresses and reading speed, I do not see feeding a video of finger covering webcam as too hard to overcome... but it could certainly help at least for a while
20.02.2026 12:48 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The stages of online samples in my research career:
1. too difficult/expensive/unrepresentative
2. too expensive but representative
3. pretty affordable but less representative
4. cheap and full of bots with garbage responses
5. wide price range and maybe full of non-people pretending to be people
19.02.2026 20:36 β
π 38
π 15
π¬ 1
π 0
An interesting Metascientific question is how we deal with deviations from preregistrations. Can we evaluate their impact on the severity of tests? If not, should studies with substantial deviations be reported as non-preregistered?
17.02.2026 07:09 β
π 5
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
despite my high expectations, #PSE8 was even better than I had imagined! Iβm truly grateful to all the organizers and attendees for such a great experience, the much needed inspiration and chance to get feedback on my little #scicom research idea β¬οΈ
16.02.2026 00:18 β
π 6
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
he is also literally walking the walk... for cats! www.justgiving.com/page/james-s... β€οΈ
14.02.2026 10:34 β
π 3
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0