Generator interconnection models typically represent system states that have precisely 0% likelihood to ever exist, and billions of dollars are cost-allocated using them. Is this a good approach?
31.03.2025 14:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@josephsilvers.bsky.social
Power systems engineer, jazz guitarist, human and beagle dad, native North Carolinian. Interests/background: grid planning, interconnection, power markets, energy policy. Views are my own.
Generator interconnection models typically represent system states that have precisely 0% likelihood to ever exist, and billions of dollars are cost-allocated using them. Is this a good approach?
31.03.2025 14:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very excited to have joined PowerGEM earlier this year. The leadership are building something truly special in the grid simulation space, and at an opportune time. Can't wait to see (and work on) the synergies, services, and products that will surely move this industry forward.
18.11.2024 23:05 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very much agree generally with the approaches in CA/NYISO being applied elsewhere. In general, improvements around modeling assumptions in interconnection study power flow model are needed. Worst-case, extremely low probability interconnection models are both hang-ups and highly unrealistic.
18.11.2024 21:09 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1Greetings! Glad to be here. I’ll probably post primarily about electric power systems and jazz guitar, and maybe some beagle content, too. Looking forward to some good discussion and engagement on this platform.
16.11.2024 23:16 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0