Jug-hootin’ Oaf

Yeah this is easy just incorporate the “leering creep who doesn’t bathe” vibes into the act now you’ve even got a gimmick

Guys Crisis

YouTube video by episode one NBA Stupid A$s - Black Flanders

Best I can say about the guy is that “White Iverson” led to “Black Flanders”

youtu.be/LuueHTka170

You don’t want to know

If you have a business exterminating feral hogs it’s your duty to name it “BoarBash” just fyi

Yeah I mean if aew puts post Malone on air that would be worth getting mad about

To clarify: I think there was a conversation worth having about whether it was more harm or more good for bouie to be at NYT. I don’t think he should have been there. But it wasn’t such a slam dunk I felt like I didn’t even need to hear the opposing argument.

But now, it kind of is a slam dunk.

I think he maybe sort of had a case the first time bluesky went after him, but NYT has crossed so many more lines since then and now it’s a no brainer he shouldn’t be there, no need to work out whether he was doing more harm or more good two years ago before taking action

It for sure won’t stop him from trying so I suppose we’ll get the chance to find out whether he can pull that one off with his supporters or not

Maybe “anyone” or “anybody”? Those work for close enough to what I meant, anyways

“A tube”???

That was autocorrect
But I’m afraid I couldn’t tell you what letters/words were supposed to be there anymore

They extremely fired a tube who might possibly save them from themselves it’s bad for us all but also a certain around by of schadenfreude to be had if nothing else

Kinda sad how we all just get ahead of the most likely bad faith interpretations of our own words as a matter of course on here. Not blaming bluesky we all did it on twitter back in the day too

As a gentleman if a certain age, I would actually prefer a clubby “forum” feel to a place where Thought Leaders gather to Discourse. It’s just for a while there was only one place to do that, I never especially wanted them around except to yell at. Of course they’re going to hate a site full of mes.

For the record this is the one that got me blocked lol I guess saying someone has anxiety on the internet is just as insulting as saying they are mad?

Knowing that at any moment, we could be snuffed out by an eruption of superheated plasma Horsey Sauce, shriveled like so many Seasoned Curly Fries, so many junior bacon chee and novelty flavored Frostys

The eternal war continues across the cosmos, with neither mercy nor remorse while we listen to the thunder from the barren hilltop

There can be no conversation without it, you’re too hyped and addled with Anxiety

Consensual war? Gtfo

What’s next consensual rape

Both nations have been mobilized on a war footing since January at least. Does that make it a mutual war? I’m using your definition here. That nobody else uses.

I think the U.S. is the aggressor and that a big reason your definition is wrong is because using would mean this is “consensual war”

As much as I hate to say it, I think maybe you need to

Touch Grass

A consensual war? Give me an example of a consensual war

If the other regime doing horrible things meant regime change was a good idea, they’d be ranching unicorns between the Tigris and Euphrates rn

Correct, the point is more that even those who were initially fooled by the rhetoric will not stay fooled for long

I did

The terms are pretty interchangeable here

Right, like if the U.S. struck first, then the retaliation would be a counterstrike

Neither term really means anything different in denotative or connotative meaning as far as I can tell. They’re pretty much synonyms.

You’re going to have to unpack why “retaliation” is acceptable to you, but not “counterstrike”

But it doesn’t matter, they’re not talking about that, they’re talking about someone being slightly rude in their mentions