lovely music! (also interesting video but you knew that)
06.12.2025 11:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@weel.bsky.social
SJW eurotrash π³π± immigrant in Alta California π YIMBY UU queer techie scum β§ genderqueer tranny (she/her or they/them) πͺ
lovely music! (also interesting video but you knew that)
06.12.2025 11:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0what snake oil salesmen told her thereβs such a thing as the βbaroness of margarineβ (gonna let the autocorrect spelling stand thereβ¦)
06.12.2025 11:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0California Attorney General Rob Bonta continues to stand up and fight for trans healthcare, joining with AGs from 20 states to defend patient privacy. π³οΈββ§οΈβ
05.12.2025 19:16 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0sponsored by the flashing and mold mitigation industry
05.12.2025 19:42 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0circling back on your double click
05.12.2025 19:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0do i want to know the context or wtf he could mean by culturally normal? because i feel like iβd really rather not
05.12.2025 19:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0sure is
05.12.2025 19:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0yeah except they wonβt. at least not for now. because the federal prosecution system has become politicized. thereβs a lot to fix.
05.12.2025 10:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0oh a absolutely. and a violation of us domestic law, too.
05.12.2025 10:39 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Seems like Dublin's policy of not having a military has downsides.
05.12.2025 10:14 β π 46 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0and anyway itβs clearly against domestic law, no?
05.12.2025 10:26 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0yeah but the us is not party to that β¦
05.12.2025 10:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0the hague invasion act is still on the books, too
05.12.2025 10:25 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0the US would have to ratify the treaty first, no?
05.12.2025 10:24 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0sheesh wonder why
05.12.2025 10:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0i shouldβve said βstrategically uselessβ rather than βirrelevantβ
because things like destroying relationships with allies is strategically very relevant, just not in a useful way
the problem as i see it is that sabotaging relationships and punching down at less powerful nations does not require a unified vision or a long term plan, but pushing back on the very real and very questionable shenanigans of rival superpowers does
05.12.2025 10:07 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0and i know full well US foreign policy is a mixed bag. but as the strategically relevant stuff is going down the tubes, the focus on strategically irrelevant but morally highly questionable shit is AFAICT only getting stronger.
05.12.2025 09:58 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0whatever faction wrote that particular document says they want that. what they actually want and who they actually are is a mystery. you cannot currently assume that the US government speaks with a unified voice on international relations. interagency process and elite consensus are dead.
05.12.2025 09:47 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0if you go by the normie definition, it already is
05.12.2025 08:10 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0if you go by the βif itβs relevant itβs not leftβ definition popular with the most annoying people on the internet, sure
05.12.2025 08:09 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah pretty much. Thereβs many factions in the US government, more so than usual, because the leadership is not just wrong but also weak. Some of the factions are more aligned with treaty allies than others. But the ones that are donβt consistently have the upper hand right now.
05.12.2025 08:07 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah. And Turkey isnβt, mostly, but that doesnβt seem to be what theyβre talking about either, oddly. Theyβre just racist, that doesnβt mean theyβre logically coherent about it.
05.12.2025 07:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If anyone wants to make the CA ban on gendered signage on single stall bathrooms a real enforceable thing, that would be great. Because currently, ainβt.
05.12.2025 06:09 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My understanding is that in practice it does end up affecting new construction.
05.12.2025 06:07 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0At least thatβs what I remembered. The only article I can track down is this which is not as strident as I remember but anyhow, the statute is not enforceable, because making it so wouldβve required extra legislative process (the βsuspense fileββ¦) www.ebar.com/story/33684
05.12.2025 06:07 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1That is what Phil Tingβs press release said when he his bill passed. It does not actually accomplish that. By the time Bay Area Reporter caught on, everyone had already copied the press release and moved on.
05.12.2025 06:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0at least california technically sort of bans that
(not really, which is phil tingβs fault)
iβm not sure exactly why iβm in an undiplomatic mood today but youβve been warned
05.12.2025 05:57 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0maybe theyβll get rid of the anti NATO plank when NATO collapses, too
not holding out hope though