seitz2all.bsky.social

My guess is that it might be effective to wait a few weeks for gas prices to spike. That might make the audience more receptive.

This reminds me of how World War I started: Serbia attacks Austria’s leaders, Austria retaliates against Serbia, so Russia attacks Austria, ….

Just checked the take out menu for our local diner, $9 for a hand-spun milkshake.

After more research, I found my nearest Baskin Robbins charges $13 for a large milkshake.

Wow. Here in Silicon Valley, CA, my closest McDonald’s sells a large Shamrock Shake for $5.19.

Proposition 19, passed in 2020, allows for a house to be partially reassessed at the time of inheritance.

boe.ca.gov/prop19/

Fair point! It also still leaves the possibility of "some 3rd factor causes both mental illness and cannabis use". For example, perhaps stress or some other factor leads first to cannabis use and then later to mental illness.

Of course, that still leaves the possibility of "some 3rd factor causes both mental illness and cannabis use". For example, perhaps stress or some other factor leads first to cannabis use and then later to mental illness.

Why doesn't it?

If you are suggesting that "mental illness causes cannabis use", wouldn't "exclude people with pre-existing mental illness" address it?

Now, I have no idea how easy it is to actually exclude people with pre-existing illness. But if it can be done, it would seem to address this.

Unfortunately, I seem to anger her when I try to express a difference of opinion where I think she is mistaken or overreaching or overgeneralizing and I end up getting blocked.

Looks like Ms. Grattan has blocked me. Just like she did on Twitter 4 years ago.

Which is too bad, because I agree with about 95% of what Ms. Grattan writes. I think she does a good job explaining FCC regulations and why they don't apply to other media, particularly cable-only channels.

Yes, you’re right, 1A limits FCC rules.

My point was about the idea that “the market” should decide what content is acceptable on VHF TV.

SCOTUS allows more regulation of VHF than other media because there isn’t the same free market in VHF TV that there is in other media.

Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969) Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC: It is permissible under the First Amendment to require media outlets to make broadcast time available for responses to personal attacks.

My understanding is SCOTUS allows far more content regulation on VHF/UHF/AM/FM than they allow on other media. For example, supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...

I think Graham is an embarrassing sycophant who should resign.

But in this particular case it sounds to me like Graham may have misunderstood Walker’s question.

Of course, the “misunderstanding” may be deliberate or due to poor listening skills. But maybe this time it’s just an honest mistake.

My understanding is that the FCC is allowed to regulate speech on VHF/UHF TV and AM/FM radio because they aren’t a free market. There’s a limited number of channels, and the government gets to choose who gets which channel.

The article says the study tried to determine correlation vs. causation:

“But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study points to a potential causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses”

The article says the study tried to determine correlation vs. causation:

“But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study points to a potential causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses”

The article says the study tried to determine correlation vs. causation:

“But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study points to a potential causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses”

The article says the study tried to determine correlation vs. causation:

“But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study points to a potential causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses”

The article says the study tried to determine correlation vs. causation:

“But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study points to a potential causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses”

I’ve now asked Internet Archive to track any further changes.

web.archive.org/web/20260227...

Yeah, I still see “Feeling suffocated in her first marriage, Blume divorced after several years and immediately rebounded to a second husband but left him two years later.”

How to Use Forecast vs. Forecasted Correctly Both forms are used for the past tense and past participle.

I appreciate the data you provide.

P.S. I know “forecasted” is becoming more popular as a past tense of “forecast”, but I personally prefer the more traditional “forecast” as both future and past tense. Probably because “cast” is both the future and past tense.

grammarist.com/usage/foreca...

I hope we get these Butterbeer items at Universal Hollywood!

But major operating systems do have built in “print” functionality that allows programs to print to any printer. So a “save to PDF” virtual printer gives every program that can print the ability to also save to PDF.

Because major operating systems have no built-in “export” functionality. Every programmer would have to create their own “export” option.

Because it’s an easy way for every program to support exporting to PDF.

I’m surprised this article omits the increased deduction for state and local taxes (SALT deduction). Maybe because it mostly affects higher income taxpayers?

a bald man wearing sunglasses and a brown jacket ALT: a bald man wearing sunglasses and a brown jacket

Sam Altman as The Architect

I think it might actually be interesting to read your take as a professional in your field.