Teletheus

𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬?

Most people seem to think “circumstantial evidence” is worse than “direct evidence.”

But much of the most objective and powerful evidence—like DNA testing or even the proverbial smoking gun—is circumstantial evidence.

I’m not going to pretend you’re capable of, or even interested in, a substantive discussion of tariffs. You’re just spewing talking points that make no sense to anyone who understands economics on even a basic level.

So you’ve already proven you don’t understand them and don’t care to try.

You don’t care about substance. You only care if it looks and sounds right to someone who doesn’t know any better. That’s all AI can do.

You’re just upset because I’m highlighting how empty your responses are.

Oh, I’m sorry, is it difficult to talk with someone who treats your responses like the nonsense they are?

I’m not going to pretend you care about substance. You’ve already proven you don’t because you’re using AI to write your responses.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again.

This is also the natural result of the GOP acting like expertise and specialized training don’t matter.

They wanted the short-term benefits of, say, pretending climate change was fake. But it inevitably led to this long-term consequence: total incompetence in their party on anything except lying.

Oh, cupcake, you can’t even handle using capital letters correctly without AI help? Bless your heart. No wonder you think Trump makes sense!

You’ve already revealed why you like using AI. You don’t know English well enough to write your own answers and don’t care if your answers are wrong.

Hey, you managed to be right again! It’s absolutely obvious you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t understand research, and are completely ignorant of the facts.

Your use of AI in spreading your misinformation doesn’t just explain why your responses are so wrong. It shows up in all the particular ways you’re wrong.

You’re actually doing a great job of proving why it’s a bad idea to trust AI to do your thinking for you. Because AI doesn’t think.

So English isn’t your first language? Let me guess: Russia? That explains a lot too.

See, the problem with AI is it doesn’t know if something is right or wrong. It only knows if the words fit and sound right to someone who doesn’t know better.

That’s why you can’t tell the difference.

We know what they are. That’s how we know convicted felon Donald Trump and his supporters are fascists.

Also, you really need to stop asking AI to help you with this misinformation campaign of yours. It’s way too obvious when you use it.

If you were a Democrat, then you would know there’s no such thing as “the Democrat Party.” All you’re doing is proving you’re not who you’re pretending to be.

Wow, and now you want people to go back to Twitter? You’re making this too easy.

Sweetheart, there’s no such thing as a moderate Republican these days. That wasn’t always true, but it’s been true for over a decade now. Moderates don’t vote for fascists.

Also, you really need a better excuse for your slip-up there. You’re making it too obvious you’ve never been a Democrat.

To be fair, Democrats need to get better with pathos. I’m glad they understand the facts on issues and care about getting details right, but these days, that’s only useful after you get elected.

The skillset for governing is completely different from the skillset for winning the election to govern.

Oh, I see the problem. You think AI is helpful for finding information instead of just saying things you want to hear.

Are you really so buried in ignorance that you can’t stop making the mistake even after someone’s mentioned it?

Is it a challenge because English isn’t your first language and you’re posting from Russia?

I’m honestly just curious at this point. I’d love to know.

Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate you being so obvious in the lies. It’s just an odd choice.

Why do you keep saying “Democrat party” when it only proves you’ve never been a Democrat? Fascinating.

Again, all you’re doing is proving yourself to be a liar.

Biden’s infrastructure bill did more to help “the American citizen” than you’re capable of understanding. Convicted felon Donald Trump has had more stupid court battles than anyone. And also, you know, he’s literally a criminal.

Saying it’s “a really good point” is a great way to signal you’re about to say something stupid.

They never give a damn about the truth, but they’re too stupid to lie convincingly to anyone who doesn’t already want to believe their nonsense.

You can just say yes. We understand you’re lying on purpose now.

Makes sense for someone supporting fascists and Nazis.

So you’re committing to the lie then?

Again, do you really believe that nonsense, or are you deliberately lying like when you pretended you were a Democrat?

Hey, wow, you managed to be right about something! I suppose baby steps are still progress of a kind.

It’s called a “trade war,” lil’ buddy. You really ought to learn the first thing about foreign policy and economics before you try to have an opinion about them.

Cupcake, what do you think “even out” means?

Are you really this ignorant about tariffs, or are you deliberately lying like you were when you pretended to be a Democrat?

I agree. You don’t need to listen to people who let their anger control their life and become raging morons. That’s why you shouldn’t listen to convicted felon Donald Trump and MAGA Morons.

You’re not capable of understanding the “long game” here. There isn’t one.