Nathan V

Yeah, he's talking head who only talks about what he's paid to and uses his power to influence people into supporting a corrupt system.

He's worse because he willingly uses his platform to push capitalist lies and propaganda.

And that's why the democrats keep getting worse and worse. Instead of blaming the politicians responsible you want to forgive them.

Pathetic.

If only...

wanted posters on a light post taken at night of Steve Nelson, president of Aetna, David Joyner, president & CEO of CVS Health. Both feature photos of the execs with three bullets labeled DENY, DEFEND, DEPOSE detailing the wrongs of the healthcare industry (but not legible enough in the picture to transcribe). “Healthcare CEOs should not feel safe. Deny - Defend - Depose” it says at the bottom.

Wanted posters of Marianne Lake, Denis Coleman, Brian Moynihan, Robin Vince in similar format as others, on a wall.

Wanted poster of Brian Thompson with an X through his photo featuring the same bulleted text as the others. “Healthcare CEOs should not feel safe. Deny - Defend - Depose” it says at the bottom.

Communique: On Wednesday morning over thirty CEOs will gather at the Conrad hotel for the second day of the Goldman Sachs Financial Services conference to discuss how they can become richer by extracting wealth, time, and energy from the working class from all over the world. To welcome them, anon actionists put up wanted posters of the leeches attending the conference, including Martin Smalls of Black Rock, Robin Vince of BNY Mellon, Denis Coleman of Goldman Sachs, and of course, Brian Thompson, the former CEO of United Healthcare. These CEOs run companies that control trillions of dollars by stealing money, time, and labor from the working class. Do they care about the problems of poverty, homelessness, and injustice at these conferences? No, and their actions are violent. Health insurance companies (like financial services companies) don’t provide us with anything useful - they only limit our access to healthcare. Those who would steal from us have names, faces, and addresses. Justice will only come from the working class.

Inbox: ‘Wanted’ posters of healthcare CEOs wheatpasted around lower Manhattan ahead of today’s Goldman Sachs Financial Services conference.

“Those who would steal from us have names, faces, and addresses. Justice will only come from the working class,” per anon communique.

Dinner is here.

Dinner is here

Dinner Is here.

I'm guessing ksmals brother in law told her to stop, just like he did after she said she would go after inflation.

After that, we got conservative harris running on a pro military pro police pro fracking platform.

Expense and access. This year I listened to 1,128 different artists and nearly 1,400 different albums. Quite a lot of them were new. I got really into exploring indie artists.

I wouldn't have had access to all of those albums. And even if only 200 were new, that's still nearly 2400$

Ah yes the white male whining about perceived victimization. Buddy. You are the poster boy for it. All white men are.

Yet you can't prove it. Your only evidence is "trust me bro."

I did the research you claimed to do and it didn't give the result you said. If you can prove me wrong go ahead.

I did some research through my colleges research hosts like Ebsco and a few others and there's nothing.

There's absolutely no professional studies on the idea of "victimhood".

Victimhood isn't used by any professional except republican talking heads trying to discredit suffering people.

But I'm still waiting, give me one peer reviewed article that talks about victimhood being a legitimate psychological phenomenon

Bartering and commerce are different than capitalism. Free market capitalism and commerce aren't the same thing. But great job showing off that 10th grade economics class you failed.

Capitalism is the private ownership of resources and the means of production. Natives didn't believe in ownership

You can't even provide a peer reviewed study that uses it and proves it's a thing.

Victimhood is a buzzword created by conservatives to belittle people who are suffering.

And not every culture uses free market economic policies. The native Americans didn't.

Where? Where is it enshrined?

Because emminent domain proves you wrong.

That's a deflection. There isn't any psychological research on it. My fiance is a psychologist and knows far better than you do.

Countries and land aren't possessions that can belong to you. That's the colonial white supremacy mindset that says if you can take it, it's yours.

This country doesn6 belong to you and never has.

Whose fault is it? Your fault because you took the job?

The lead? Or is it the responsibility of the employer who built the factory and put you in that position?

It's not victimhood. It's called empathy. Something you seem to lack.

Can you show me psychological studies of this "victim mindset"?

Or are you just using buzzwords?

And it's not a victim mindset though. It's seeing the corrupt systems of power for what they are.

If you're working in a business that has high levels of lead in the air and you get brain damage.

I guarantee I've done more good for my community and the people around me than you have. But keep worshipping rapists and murderers.

It's actually not irrelevant. It's totally relevant considering you are going to be living in off grid land that is likely native territory in Alaska.

Most of Alaska is either native territory or federal or state lands.

Good Job being condescending tho

They were bad people then and they're bad people now.

The legality of one conquering force doesn't absolve them of the monstrosities they committed. It doesn't make 5hem men to be worshiped because they chose violence and colonizing over peace.

What context and what policies? Again, the law doesn't make something moral. Not today. Not then.

Being normal for the ruling class and rich elite doesn't mean the population agrees with it. The majority of our history comes from those who were educated enough to record it. And they weren't always truthful

They were condemned at the time. Just not by the rich assholes in charge.

In the 1860s the state of California paid settlers nearly 100$ per indigenous adult scalp and 50$ for the scalps of children, subsidized by federal funds.

How is that moral? In any context?

There were abolitionists in that era that prove you wrong. Does the Bible not act as a moral compass? Yet we have men like Thomas Jefferson graping his 10 year old slave daughter.

In what context is that moral?