All I can say is that if any 'Reform women' are planning on voting for that, they want their heads seeing to.
25.02.2026 19:40 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0@jacquesriverain.bsky.social
Pas de messages privés stp. Sauf si tu veux me donner des thunes ! Film poliziotteschi. J'aime les chats. Heterodox econ.
All I can say is that if any 'Reform women' are planning on voting for that, they want their heads seeing to.
25.02.2026 19:40 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0😂
25.02.2026 15:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is that a bribe for the orange cat?
25.02.2026 15:47 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Crocuses are out here so I think yes.
24.02.2026 18:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0When they're dedicated to privatisation such fines will only ever be lip-service or waived, because they truly, like a religion, that if these companies weren't running these services the economy would collapse. They're ignorant, neo-monetarist idiots.
24.02.2026 18:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, I said they are not gaining masses of 'revenue' since it is clearly a tax mainly, if not wholly borne by U.S. consumers. The federal govt 'getting paid' is them cancelling money from circulation. So any idea they're stockpiling money is misguided.
24.02.2026 16:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I never said they directly paid the U.S. government. The importer does that.
24.02.2026 15:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Nothing will happen because the chancellor is wedded to neoliberal ideas and imagines the govt is funded by taxes and 'borrowing'. It has been Labour's problem since the late 70s: failed to counter monetarist myths and instead adopted them.
24.02.2026 01:07 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Apple turning in to 1990s Windows.😂
24.02.2026 00:54 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That can indeed happen, though they invariably pass all or a portion of it onto the consumer. Its also very possible that because the US import market is so large an foreign exporter can also absorb it by reducing per unit margins and making it up on volume.
24.02.2026 00:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Don't gif images actually move?
24.02.2026 00:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Maybe not 'writing' but accounting. Markings seem to have been for purposes of accounting, poetry comes later.
24.02.2026 00:16 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's exactly how they work in practise. They officially cost is to the foreign exporter, who then adds it to the price for the importer who adds it to the price for the consumer. If you have other knowledge enlighten me. The notion it is vast 'govt revenue' is mistaken.
24.02.2026 00:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0It doesn't really make much sense as a 'govt refund' because it was businesses offsetting the cost of those tariffs, paid to foreign exporters, onto consumers. His claims that the treasury was 'collecting revenues' is complete gibberish. What should happen is social spending to that amount.
23.02.2026 22:00 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Or 'biceps' because there are two heads!
23.02.2026 21:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Anatomically speaking it is a bicep.
23.02.2026 21:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0As a verb 'brave' means 'face up to'.
23.02.2026 14:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Cruel!
23.02.2026 14:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0...which won't flush away.
23.02.2026 04:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Put it away you pervert.
23.02.2026 00:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ice hockey.
23.02.2026 00:01 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Always amazing how governments can exercise their will (as the supposed will of the people) when they decide to. Aside form this they pretend that government power is limited. They find it easy to use it to oppress, but hard to use if for the public good.
22.02.2026 16:07 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kind Hearts and Coronets!
22.02.2026 16:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Problem is the perpetrator is the top guy.
22.02.2026 01:04 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's very nice indeed, but would be better without the donkey's ears.
22.02.2026 00:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Right now it is price-gouging.
21.02.2026 18:49 — 👍 15 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Splendid.
21.02.2026 18:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I couldn't afford the Polaroid cartridges.
21.02.2026 00:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes, I know. Though where I am they are a lot more women-friendly. Still doesn't stop unwanted interference from men and religious busybodies generally.
20.02.2026 23:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0In some way it would be funny, because he can't even go over 15% and it has to be uniform, so countries where he promises 'no tariffs' as a policy sweetener get tariffs, and those he meant to punish probably get lower tariffs than what Congress already voted to apply. 😂 He's such a failure.
20.02.2026 22:25 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0