Hah to me the soap shapes look like surrealist madly smiling faces ๐
12.10.2025 04:54 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@undertheteacup.bsky.social
Once and future librarian. White immigrant. they/them or xe/xym/xyr/xyrself Big ol nerd about queer media, spec-fic, cool weird bugs and mushrooms and plants and rocks.
Hah to me the soap shapes look like surrealist madly smiling faces ๐
12.10.2025 04:54 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I love the tassels dangling in your face ๐
12.10.2025 03:32 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Have you read The Sellout by Paul Beatty? I feel like that might fit the bill
10.10.2025 14:59 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0For Romance as a book genre/marketing category, yes. I have my own opinions about that but it is a fact that if you market a book as Romance, thatโs what youโre communicating to readers and what they will expect to find.
Not applicable to stories in other media though.
I didn't even know I somehow got my copy early! Sign up if you want slightly pulpy very trans hiveminds and fungal intelligence and neurospiciness and space opera noir-ish and Diaspora feels and righteous crankiness and competitive community art and I WANNA EAT THE THING
08.10.2025 03:58 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The photo is a combination of long blades of green grasses, red and yellow turning foliage and wildflower seed pods with a little blurry background visible through the foliage.
On the edge of the meadow
๐๐ป
Oh absolutely. Thereโs a reason for the joke about anarchist meetings using a progressive stack!
09.10.2025 03:41 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0when dudes go "well I as a man would *love* it if women catcalled me" to argue that it's appreciation, not harassment when they do it, people are rightly incensed.
It's hard to switch paradigms to one where taking power into account would do more harm than good.
I can see why people have a hard time with it, why it smells funny to folks if they don't stop to really engage with it. In a lot of talking about oppressive systems, position *matters* and you can't just switch things around. When white people try to say "cracker" is a slur against us, or
09.10.2025 03:02 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maybe because then moderation decisions would vary based on an account's audience size and composition, which seems like it does sort of create a "uWu smol bean exception"?
09.10.2025 02:51 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Fascinating! Part of me keeps that what the audience does with the thing (e.g. if they go harass a labeled person) seems like it shouldn't be considered in moderation rules and decisions about the thing itself, in the same way that power isn't??? I can't quite tell why I have that sense though
09.10.2025 02:49 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What would have to change in order for those to end badly, would you say? Like, what makes them not harassment now but might make them fall in that category in the future?
09.10.2025 02:28 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeahhhh I kept thinking "but doesn't power matter" and I do think it influences e.g. what gets reported, how the human mods perceive posts, etc. but you can't build the rules around it like "the more powerful a user is, the higher the threshold for what counts as harassment against them"
09.10.2025 02:16 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0gouache landscape painting of rain clouds, lights and trees
dark
09.10.2025 01:37 โ ๐ 134 ๐ 30 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0IF* the bot WERE* of someone like JKR's...
sigh this is what I get for trying to condense under character limit
I can see what Rahaeli means about ideological alignment, because if someone made a bot like that for my account, it would come off as vaguely disconcerting or maybe threatening. but the bot is of someone like JKR's account, it just reminds me people were pointing out her liking TERF posts for years
09.10.2025 02:05 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I've gone back and forth in pondering what makes that harassment, because I don't think it's actually textbook. Or at least, when I think online harassment I think.. I dunno, something like replying to every single thing someone posts with the word "idiot." But the bot didn't even tag his account.
09.10.2025 01:58 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0This kind of explanation work is so immensely time-consuming and people who are putting out 15 simultaneous fires just don't have the capacity to do it, plus the psychological barrier of "why should I explain when it will be taken in the worst faith possible no matter what" is huge
08.10.2025 15:41 โ ๐ 102 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0"Why doesn't [site] communicate more about anything" well maybe because every time they do, hundreds of people lose their entire fucking shit for the next five days and a new completely wrong folk belief starts getting repeated as fact and becomes the basis for even more shit-losing
08.10.2025 15:44 โ ๐ 117 ๐ 17 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 1kinda sweet that bookshop.org's anti-prime sale overlaps with banned books week, which means today you can get free shipping PLUS 20% off their banned books list! bookshop.org/info/banned-...
08.10.2025 15:13 โ ๐ 296 ๐ 168 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 13Boxes also work on bobcats
07.10.2025 15:09 โ ๐ 1954 ๐ 637 ๐ฌ 31 ๐ 59Regardless of if you celebrate the Mid-Autumn Moon Festival, the Harvest Moon, or just making it through the day, every night we see is another one our enemies wish we hadn't.
Here's tonight's #FullMoon rising.
I hope if you have some clear skies you can look up and smile tonight. โค๏ธ
FULL AGREE just adding alt text !
24.09.2025 23:03 โ ๐ 24 ๐ 12 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0๐ฑ A fruity photoshoot: the last weird cucumber vogueing next to a terracotta pot - to which its colour-matched.
06.10.2025 21:50 โ ๐ 43 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0MPL -Making public libraries sexy again.
06.10.2025 21:30 โ ๐ 14 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Happy Mid-Autumn Festival (ไธญ็ง็ฏ)! ๐ฅฎ
06.10.2025 11:12 โ ๐ 160 ๐ 57 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1Walking outside, letting my eyes unfocus and just observe the movement of plants in the breeze, play of sunlight and shadow across different surfaces, etc
06.10.2025 05:44 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Please god
06.10.2025 00:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0frog butt. itโs cute as hell. you probably wanna poke it or something weird like that. itโs ok. itโs just a picture. go ahead. poke your screen
look at this frog butt
18.09.2025 21:15 โ ๐ 298 ๐ 82 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 7