A total rout in the Miami mayoral, in a race that had been highly nationalized (Trump endorsed the loser).
The Dem (Higgins) over-performed 2024 presidential in predominantly Cuban (+8), non-Cuban Hispanic (+9), Black (+9), and White (+11) precincts-- over-performance across the board.
10.12.2025 02:02 β
π 269
π 65
π¬ 2
π 5
Republicans may have a Latino problem (again)
What New Jersey can teach the parties about Latino voters.
On what we can actually learn about Hispanic and Latino voters from Tuesday's elections, with @carlosodio.bsky.social: www.vox.com/politics/467...
06.11.2025 14:31 β
π 21
π 8
π¬ 1
π 2
In NJ-09, one of the stateβs most-watched CDs, Sherrill way over-performed 2024 support in the densest Hispanic precincts. Given recent past, it is reasonable to expect that 2025, not 2024, is the proper benchmark for 2026. Thatβs a big boost for incumbent Nellie Pou.
05.11.2025 19:22 β
π 5
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Hereβs Passaic County now, preliminarily. Sherrill support closely tracks Murphy β21 in Hispanic precincts, way outperforming Harris there. Turnout is lower in Hispanic areas, per usual for Passaic, but less notable in 2025 than in 2021.
05.11.2025 14:25 β
π 3
π 1
π¬ 0
π 1
Looking at all available precincts in Hudson County, Sherrill support is higher in the most-densely Hispanic turf & tracks closely with '21. Turnout is *higher* than '21 across the county-- and even more so in the most Hispanic precincts.
05.11.2025 04:58 β
π 63
π 18
π¬ 0
π 5
Update: safe to say that Trump discontent isn't a polling mirage. Partial end-of-night #s have Sherrill coming in at around '21 levels in key Hispanic cities in NJ: in aggregate, higher than '20/'24, but lower than '16/'17. The tape is rewound a bit heading into '26.
05.11.2025 04:57 β
π 6
π 4
π¬ 0
π 0
NJ election is the first real measure of Latino support since last year. A test of whether the Trump discontent in polls is re-shaping behavior heading into '26: will Sherrill come in closer to '21 or '24 in Hispanic bellwethers?
Here are cities to watch. Note '24 vs. prior.
04.11.2025 20:48 β
π 19
π 7
π¬ 3
π 3
July 2025 Poll on Latinos, Trump and the Economy | Equis Research
This memo summarizes key findings from a national poll of 1,614 registered Hispanic voters, conducted with Data for Progress from July 7 to 17, 2025. This poll has a margin of error of Β± 2 pp.
New national polling of Latinos out today from the Equis team in partnership w/ @dataforprogress.org : views on Trumpβs economic moves, what they most want to see now, & how it shapes their views of the parties β & their vote in 2026.
Memo & toplines here:
www.weareequis.us/research/202...
31.07.2025 17:52 β
π 11
π 3
π¬ 1
π 0
Full memo and toplines here:
www.weareequis.us/research/may...
16.05.2025 16:14 β
π 8
π 4
π¬ 0
π 2
New Equis polling out today, our first public release this year.
16.05.2025 16:13 β
π 11
π 3
π¬ 0
π 1
If others have not already hooked you up, we can probably help cc @juan-machado.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/juan...
02.04.2025 20:16 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Our first clean look at Latino voting post-2024
02.04.2025 18:37 β
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
Tip of the day for avoiding Trumpβs traps
Donβt knock him for doing things differently, knock him for doing them poorly.
Distinguish between shaking things up and fucking things up.
28.01.2025 15:57 β
π 60
π 16
π¬ 1
π 1
For my particular focus, will need to wrestle with βcloseness to people with a migration backgroundβ as a distinguishing feature of New Left vs New Right
12.12.2024 14:33 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Found this one very compelling: βuniversalismβ (cosmopolitan) vs. βparticularismβ (traditionalist) as an update to post-materialism, explaining trends across class, education & urbanicity. (They point to the rise of knowledge economies.) Also assign prominent role to candidates & group identities.
12.12.2024 14:27 β
π 11
π 1
π¬ 2
π 0
The chart is useful bc it shows views on border & future flow. As you know, that is half the story. The other half is views on long-term immigrants β which was the more defining battle in an earlier era.
11.12.2024 13:52 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The piece is well-written. The problem is that in dismantling a one-dimensional approach (Latinos only care about immig), it threatens to replace it w/ another (ββ are no diff on immig).
Canβt understand Latino vote past or present w/o unpacking the unique cross-pressures created by this issue.
11.12.2024 13:33 β
π 17
π 5
π¬ 2
π 0
Cue Montell Jordan: this is how you do it
07.12.2024 03:39 β
π 32
π 7
π¬ 0
π 0
Rule #1 for side-stepping Trumpβs favorite traps:
Donβt let him draw you into defending the wrong things.
No need to defend: red tape, fentanyl smugglers, the military industrial complex, the status quo generally
Do defend: consumers, workers, families, real people generally
06.12.2024 12:56 β
π 39
π 8
π¬ 1
π 0
Preach
26.11.2024 18:50 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
The Path Forward: Rebuilding Latino Support | The Latino Vote Episode 64 - Featuring Carlos Odio
Podcast Episode Β· The Latino Vote Β· 11/15/2024 Β· 53m
@mikemadrid.bsky.social @carlosodio.bsky.social deliver a master class discussion on what just happened re the Latino vote. Spoiler: itβs not what you think happened. Learn and pass it on.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
26.11.2024 18:31 β
π 20
π 8
π¬ 1
π 1
Fortunately, orgs like Young Men Research Initiative have done extensive analysis of where persuadable voters get their news. Hint: they don't think of it as news, rather as funny and interesting content that keeps their ears busy at work
youngmenresearchinitiative.substack.com/p/where-do-d...
26.11.2024 14:52 β
π 40
π 15
π¬ 1
π 2
From this article bsky.app/profile/carl...
26.11.2024 18:14 β
π 3
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
This one breaks my heart. There is wishful thinking here. But also rational calculation based on past experience (see: enforcement of DeSantis immigration law). And thereβs what came to be understood on campaign trail (Vance: βwe start with the criminal migrantsβ), w/o pushback from Harris campaign.
26.11.2024 18:14 β
π 18
π 4
π¬ 2
π 0
βItβs not fairβ β the sentiment at the heart of things, from those frustrated by broken immigration promises
Great @propublica.org piece
t.co/0ic8u6oGNm
26.11.2024 14:15 β
π 11
π 3
π¬ 1
π 1
Cool finding & charts brought to you by @juan-machado.bsky.social
22.11.2024 22:00 β
π 1
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
By comparison, Harris voters weren't ticket splitting as much.
In Latino-heavy precincts, more "none of the above" than explicit Brown splitting; the opposite in the least Hispanic precincts.
22.11.2024 22:00 β
π 0
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
Here's another way to look at it. As Washoe precincts get more Hispanic, there is more ticket-splitting AND more de facto roll-off (Nevada's unique "none of the above" option) among Trump voters.
22.11.2024 22:00 β
π 0
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
In Washoe's heavily Latino precincts (30%+), 8.6% of Trump voters voted for Rosen, 8.9% voted "none of the above" or 3rd party & 1.5% skipped altogether.
22.11.2024 22:00 β
π 0
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0