Thank you for your service
05.11.2025 18:00 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@wth2024.bsky.social
Thank you for your service
05.11.2025 18:00 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have faith in them endlessly producing fodder
04.11.2025 15:49 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Incapable of owning his bad behavior and just saying “sorry”
04.11.2025 02:41 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I hope he shared this on Unpublished Northampton.
PS I really want to see those Signal chats. Can we FOIA them? Where's the queen when you need her?
Are you on there calling her out?
(No comparison, btw - no one on here is an elected official, nor a candidate as far as I can tell)
❤️😂
31.10.2025 17:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also, it’s wolves, Dan, not wolfs.
So the graphic artist sucks at graphics and at words…excellent!
And thank you for the brilliant alt text @urchinblue.bsky.social
Does that even closely resemble Loisel’s signs? So confusing
30.10.2025 23:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wish Jillian duclos’s opinion that it is not the city’s job to support people in need had become more of an issue this election.
30.10.2025 02:48 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0maybe that money is buried under the $10 million tennis courts?
30.10.2025 00:48 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0standing O, for your perseverance in watching this (i love that she uses one of those filters that make your face look like you’re made of soft-serve), and in doing this re-cap.
30.10.2025 00:47 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i tried, I really tried, but I couldn't do it. Why is she obsessed with Elizabeth Silver? I find it so odd. (as soon as i heard her start on that I turned it off)
29.10.2025 20:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0he is incapable of apologizing...because he is never wrong
29.10.2025 20:26 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nov 5, 1997..
28.10.2025 21:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Anything beloved by northampton is now suspect and clearly another conspiracy to keep the mayor in power
27.10.2025 17:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I don't think whoever posted this deserve any protection
26.10.2025 15:21 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good question! He missed my wit and wisdom?
21.10.2025 13:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0oh damn, Dan blocked me again (if he called me m'am one more time I'm not sure what I was going to do, so probably for the best).
21.10.2025 12:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Respect for Ace for calling this out
19.10.2025 14:01 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It’s hard to saw if Laurie or Q looks more demonic
18.10.2025 22:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0According to Mayor Dan it went home with students.
18.10.2025 19:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You nail it again!
18.10.2025 02:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I guess W3C is on best behavior as Nov 4 approaches
17.10.2025 19:41 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I fear he has been talked out of it
16.10.2025 01:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Genius (thank you for watching these pages so we don’t have to!)…also, still waiting for Jeremy’s op-ed on Signal
15.10.2025 20:31 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think you have to look at it thru the lens of a man-child having a temper tantrum because he lost to a couple of girls
11.10.2025 12:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Another example of their “we are all about people with disabilities until it inconveniences us” bullshit.
Or should I say , “little people in wheelchairs”?
And let’s not forget one at-large candidate who actively worked against an accessibility project on warfield place.
09.10.2025 19:48 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The most trumpy thing I hear from them: “Well I don’t like the way Quaverly (or Stein) behaves or treats people, but I can overlook it because I like where s/he stands on things”
08.10.2025 01:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0they are SUFFERING? Really?
Omg
Ultimately, I think that is the crux of the matter. They dismiss all of their bad behavior because they say they are doing it to “protect the children“.
And now they are broadening that to the idea they are all being somehow tortured or something?