Dr. Justin Baumann's Avatar

Dr. Justin Baumann

@jbaumann3.bsky.social

Asst. Prof, Bates College Environmental Studies (Lewiston, ME) || Marine invertebrate ecology, ecophysiology, and biogeochemistry. Website: https://jbaumann3.wordpress.com/ R tutorials: https://jbaumann3.github.io/intro_r_for_bio_eco

352 Followers  |  365 Following  |  111 Posts  |  Joined: 20.09.2023  |  1.9784

Latest posts by jbaumann3.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
AI’s water problem is worse than we thought A new investigation reveals how Amazon is amplifying Oregon’s nitrate pollution crisis.

heated.world/p/data-cente... from @emorwee.bsky.social

04.12.2025 20:23 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Chatbots β€” LLMs β€” do not know facts and are not designed to be able to accurately answer factual questions. They are designed to find and mimic patterns of words, probabilistically. When they’re β€œright” it’s because correct things are often written down, so those patterns are frequent. That’s all.

19.06.2025 11:21 β€” πŸ‘ 36988    πŸ” 11408    πŸ’¬ 638    πŸ“Œ 968
Preview
Fully protected Marine Protected Areas do not displace fisheries | PNAS Fully protected Marine Protected Areas do not displace fisheries

Fisheries: Creating marine protected areas only displaces fisheries and does not benefit the ocean

Costello: No they don't and yes they do

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

22.10.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 42    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Hi folks! Is anyone recruiting masters students that pay a livable stipend? I have an excellent senior who is an incredible researcher and seeking a position. She is top notch and really interested in mechanistic questions- currently working on Aiptasia, Astrangia and Nematostella.

21.10.2025 13:23 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Beginning of semester me: *sets aside Tuesday and Thursday for research*

Me now: Spends all of Tuesday and Thursday grading and writing emails.

:(

02.10.2025 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)

NSF GRFP solicitation out.
App deadlines now in November.
As others noted, eligibility rules for current graduate students now exclude 2nd year grad students. See the solicitation - they’ve emphasized β€œfirst year” and β€œless than one academic year” in grad program.

www.nsf.gov/funding/oppo...

26.09.2025 16:28 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
OpenAI admits AI hallucinations are mathematically inevitable, not just engineering flaws In a landmark study, OpenAI researchers reveal that large language models will always produce plausible but false outputs, even with perfect data, due to fundamental statistical and computational limi...

Reason No. 324 why no-one should think that "AI" (artificial but certainly not intelligent) is an unmitigated Good Thing: it's mathematically inevitable that AI will hallucinate.

We need far more discussion of the risks of all this and less frantic hype. I mean, really, what's the hurry?

24.09.2025 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 27    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 3

CHβ‚„ has a lifetime of about a decade in the atmosphere, whereby it oxidizes to COβ‚‚ and remains in the atmosphere for tens of thousands of years. More than 99% of the cumulative climate impact (i.e., the radiative forcing) is from its life as COβ‚‚. In the end, it's still COβ‚‚ that gets you. πŸ₯²

10.09.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 145    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Pulling mussels: Bates researchers spend the summer studying Maine’s disappearing shellfish A research team from Bates spent the summer investigating Maine's disappearing shellfish, the blue mussel.

New press from Bates on what my summer students were up to
www.bates.edu/news/2025/09...

Read all about our journey across the Maine intertidal :)

04.09.2025 20:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I present to you- my lab as trees.
My students said we needed β€œmore whimsy”, so we have it now. Great summer working in mussel physiology with these awesome students

22.08.2025 20:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sounds good. My own experience is that green crabs often have some blue coloring on claws and elsewhere. I’d guess is not a hybrid. But the blue is very blue and there are people who might be keen to test it out!

20.08.2025 21:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can you elaborate on the location (what bay, for example) and how common this blue morph is?

Any more photos?

20.08.2025 20:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We can’t even get everyone to read the syllabus 😭

24.07.2025 13:38 β€” πŸ‘ 177    πŸ” 28    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

I used to tell biology/forestry/ecology graduate students that being a Federal Agency Research Scientist was a great career to shoot for, but they might not even exist next year.

12.07.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 86    πŸ” 32    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone is acting like US scientists will just go get science jobs elsewhere and sure some will but there are not anywhere close to enough science jobs elsewhere.

The end result of this will be much, much, much less science, not science happening in different places.

10.07.2025 20:25 β€” πŸ‘ 610    πŸ” 193    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 11
Post image

I wrote about chemtrails, Lee Zeldin, and how his EPA routinely brags about its participation in a conspiracy to let corporations poison us
newrepublic.com/article/1978...

11.07.2025 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 151    πŸ” 56    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

Read news, op-eds, and analysis, not AI summaries. Create your own art (even if it's messy) or hire an artist to do it. Do your own homework. Talk to people, not chatbots. Keep your thinking and skills sharp and cherish our messy humanity. That's the new punk rock.

07.07.2025 16:47 β€” πŸ‘ 788    πŸ” 253    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 12
Governments must enable faster
wind growth and increase
ambition
National targets are not ambitious enough for a global tripling, and most
countries are still not on track to deliver even these.
A global tripling of renewables capacity as agreed at COP28 last year means at least a
tripling of wind capacity. The vast majority of countries that currently have wind capacity
installed also have wind targets for 2030. However, the sum of those targets only aims for
just over a doubling of capacity, and falls short of the tripling needed to stay on the 1.5C
pathway. Forecasts for global wind capacity suggest that meeting the 2030 national targets
is achievable, in aggregate. However, this is almost entirely due to China’s dramatic rise as a
global wind leader. Without China, the rest of the world is set to fall far short of national
targets and even farther from a tripling.
Wind has an important role to play in meeting electricity generation needs associated with
the global tripling of capac

Governments must enable faster wind growth and increase ambition National targets are not ambitious enough for a global tripling, and most countries are still not on track to deliver even these. A global tripling of renewables capacity as agreed at COP28 last year means at least a tripling of wind capacity. The vast majority of countries that currently have wind capacity installed also have wind targets for 2030. However, the sum of those targets only aims for just over a doubling of capacity, and falls short of the tripling needed to stay on the 1.5C pathway. Forecasts for global wind capacity suggest that meeting the 2030 national targets is achievable, in aggregate. However, this is almost entirely due to China’s dramatic rise as a global wind leader. Without China, the rest of the world is set to fall far short of national targets and even farther from a tripling. Wind has an important role to play in meeting electricity generation needs associated with the global tripling of capac

Listen: this is obscenely important. There is a growing complacency that over-achieving solar can make up for under-achieving wind, and it is *not true*.

Wind and solar generate in a complementary way. Solar might max out. Wind needs much more support!!

ember-climate.org/insights/res...

09.08.2024 11:57 β€” πŸ‘ 457    πŸ” 65    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 7
a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

a chart showing most models are red - ie, no disclosure - for alphabet, microsoft, openai, anthropic

New @sashamtl.bsky.social et al paper - assessing whether machine learning model developers disclose basic environmental / energy information with their models. They mostly do not!!

Grim results for most of the big companies:

arxiv.org/abs/2506.15572

huggingface.co/spaces/sasha...

20.06.2025 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Yes. I am right. I am seeing how Chat GPT is ruining students critical thinking and writing skills in real time. It is not the future. It is a tool designed to render the populace helpless, to make people doubt their innate intelligence, and to foster overreliance on technology.

19.06.2025 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 7877    πŸ” 2363    πŸ’¬ 123    πŸ“Œ 121
Post image

Today on Juneteenth, I am amplifying #BlackInTheIvory anecdotes that were shared by Black scientists πŸ§ͺ in summer 2020.

Screenshots from Twitter presented in anonymized format 2025 is the era of the "anti-DEI crusade".

19.06.2025 15:41 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

If a human told you things that were correct 80% of the time but claimed, flat out, with absolute confidence, that they were correct 100% of the time, you would dislike them & never trust a word they say. All I'm really suggesting is for people to treat chatbots with that same distrust & antagonism.

19.06.2025 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 2683    πŸ” 549    πŸ’¬ 54    πŸ“Œ 41

But the idea that β€œthe product doesn’t suffer” seems so questionable. And also (per other comments) just doesn’t seem possible

19.06.2025 00:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Peer review is slow! This is a pre-print that is ideally in the review process now. Pre-print sharing is common in academic spheres. Though grain of salt required…

No idea if these authors have submitted this for peer review or not.

18.06.2025 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

www.statnews.com/2025/06/16/n...

16.06.2025 20:06 β€” πŸ‘ 74    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Super important point here-- privatizing GRFP or really anything funding science makes folks doing the work beholden or at least feel beholden to whatever special interest is funding. This drastically impact messaging, results, and even the questions that are asked.

22.05.2025 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Museum Specialist - New York, NY 10024 - Indeed.com American Museum of Natural History

The Invertebrate Paleontology department at the AMNH is seeking a full-time Museum Specialist.

www.indeed.com/viewjob?from...

22.05.2025 17:38 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This seems accurate to me! Thanks for chiming in :)

22.05.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Cutting NSF, NIH, etc funding in this manner prevents knowledge generation, innovation (even though I hate that concept), risks human/public health, and keeps the populous less informed. That, my friends, is fascism.

22.05.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@jbaumann3 is following 20 prominent accounts