Meta won’t let morality get in the way of a product launch
What a great time to add facial recognition to everything!
“Just because you are outside of your home doesn’t mean you have consented to having a random bozo collect your face and your name, the latter of which can enable them to search for your digital presence or even home address. The act of existing in public should not carry those risks.”
01.03.2026 14:19 —
👍 714
🔁 288
💬 22
📌 25
Ctrl alt speech episode page with 1 day ago highlighted
Hard fork podcast episode page with 17h ago highlighted
Receipts to prove it:
28.02.2026 05:16 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Whoops, Websites Realize That Killing Their Comment Sections Was A Mistake
So for years we pointed out how the trend of news websites killing off their comment section (usually because they were too cheap or lazy to creatively manage them) was counterproductive.…
“A subscription to news outlets doesn’t just have to provide access to journalism, it can feature participation in journalism.” 👏👏👏
@techdirt.com’s @karlbode.com notes that online comment sections can actually help bring new life to a news organization.
26.02.2026 16:21 —
👍 4
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 0
*chef's kiss*
25.02.2026 10:34 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The consensus I'm getting from nearly everyone I speak to – with the notable exception of Spurs fans – is that Spurs going down would be the shot in the arm the country needs at this difficult moment #lufc
23.02.2026 17:04 —
👍 57
🔁 7
💬 4
📌 0
I had a great time talking the latest tech policy news with Ben, including some deep cuts on meta political ads during Hungary’s parliamentary election and a new report on debanking from @publicpubics.bsky.social and @internetmaggie.com
17.02.2026 08:48 —
👍 2
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Thanks Michael! I agree, there’s much more to be done there
14.02.2026 16:32 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The social media ban brigade won’t like this one
14.02.2026 11:32 —
👍 9
🔁 5
💬 0
📌 0
This headline should’ve been ‘My big blimp gets all the blows to work hard, damn right it’s better than yours’
14.02.2026 11:26 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Many thanks for that too! And for the link to Joan Westernberg piece, I'd not come across that.
12.02.2026 19:18 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Journalism insight in your lugholes
Three fabulous podcast episodes that are well worth your time.
Bit of a stonking week in podcast listening:
* @benwhitelaw.bsky.social and @masnick.com on the return of comments
* Ezra Klein, Cory Doctorow and Tim Wu on the internet we ended up with
* @arusbridger.bsky.social and @lionelbarber.bsky.social interviewing @eliothiggins.bsky.social.
Links here:
12.02.2026 15:01 —
👍 8
🔁 2
💬 2
📌 0
Thanks for the inclusion Adam. And glad you also enjoyed the Ezra Klein Show this week too!
12.02.2026 18:59 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The number eight at Bramall Lane that #LUFC should consider buying is, ironically, not the one we’ve been linked to for the last two years.
09.02.2026 20:50 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Screenshot of an online forum discussion thread on a September 25, 2012 article from the Times of London. The thread contains four comments:
First comment posted at 9:29 AM by a partially redacted username. The text discusses being in mid-forties with a job, wife, and teenage children, mentioning dark thoughts about ending it all.
Second comment posted at 10:01 AM by a partially redacted username. Suggests talking to a professional about personal issues and mentions stress, depression, health, or aging as possible reasons for thoughts. Recommends releasing pressure by writing things down.
Third comment posted at 10:58 AM by Ben Whitelaw, identified as Communities Editor, with a small avatar image. Recommends speaking to the Samaritans, describes them as trained professionals available 24 hours a day, and includes a URL link: http://www.samaritans.org/how-we-can-help-you/contact-us. Ends with "Hope that helps, regards, Ben - Communities Editor".
Fourth comment with no timestamp visible, asking why not seek help and wishing the person well.
You never know what’s going to happen in the comments. Here, over a decade ago, a commenter on a Times of London article bore their soul, and other commenters showed up for them.
@benwhitelaw.bsky.social l says, “I believe in the comments, and I think they have a future.”
20.01.2026 16:14 —
👍 2
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 0
A woman on my commuter train just squeezed herself onto a busy carriage, shouted ‘who dares wins!’ at the people standing on the platform and laughed maniacally and that’s why I love this city
19.01.2026 18:07 —
👍 7
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
There’s up to seven from Bournemouth (2 dropped), Fulham (1 dropped), Man City (1 dropped) and Newcastle (1 or 3 dropped, depending on your view)
19.01.2026 18:00 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Only seven less than Bielsa? What a return
18.01.2026 17:23 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
💬🗞️ Why newsrooms are taking comments seriously again
Three lessons from running comments at The Times of London
News site comment sections can be oases of public discourse because newsrooms are invested in quality. Encouraging to read they may be having a renaissance according to @benwhitelaw.bsky.social who shares lessons from moderating comments at the Times of London.
newpublic.substack.com/p/why-newsro...
17.01.2026 14:09 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Ok that’s wild
17.01.2026 09:20 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Please help this Brit understand why they are so expensive
17.01.2026 09:13 —
👍 9
🔁 0
💬 3
📌 0
Thanks Maik, might be time to return to it
16.01.2026 13:40 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
And, no, I don't want to vibe code something
16.01.2026 12:11 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
An email saying that Stoop Inbox has closed down
My Stoop Inbox account — which I used for managing newsletters — wasn't updating. So I emailed the team and it turns out it's been closed down :(
Any suggestions for apps to read/categorise/search newsletters? Is @feedly.com good for that now?
16.01.2026 12:11 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0