Dan Murphy's Avatar

Dan Murphy

@bungdan.bsky.social

Ex Journalist Bloomberg/FEER/CSM. Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia, then Iraq/Egypt with a smattering of everywhere else. Same handle over at Mos Eisley Spaceport. Made wine for a few years. Now training a blue heeler in the CA foothills.

6,140 Followers  |  401 Following  |  12,247 Posts  |  Joined: 03.07.2023  |  2.0984

Latest posts by bungdan.bsky.social on Bluesky


1/ You can also read the text in English here: www.bundesliga.com/en/bundeslig... - maybe the best thing about this is exactly how specific Kompany gets about both the nature of and the solution to the problem. He names names, he provides a path forward.

20.02.2026 16:13 β€” πŸ‘ 150    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 5

The class actions are going to be glorious.

20.02.2026 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It was not uncommon to find these in offices on bases on Iraq. True story.

20.02.2026 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a red button that has the word easy on it ALT: a red button that has the word easy on it
20.02.2026 16:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean

20.02.2026 02:20 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Normal people: "Iranian regime collapse might be a very bad, no good, dangerous thing."
Trump and the GOP: "Let's just push this button and go get a snack."

20.02.2026 16:20 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

it's a serious problem for the credibility of the court when a a sitting member is basically an internet troll who will say anything no matter how ludicrous to justify a position he already holds and we have to pretend like there's anything else going on here with him

20.02.2026 16:08 β€” πŸ‘ 223    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Our partner hotels are being hit hard, with many housekeeping & food/beverage employees still on what was only supposed to be a temporary layoff in January. One concierge said, β€œwe don’t hear any European languages or Canadian accents in my lobby.”

20.02.2026 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
GDP (Advance Estimate), 4th Quarter and Year 2025 | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 1.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2025 (October, November, and December), according to the advance estimate released today by the U....

"GDP increased 2.2% in 2025, compared with an increase of 2.8% in 2024... The price index for gross domestic purchases increased 2.6% in 2025, compared with an increase of 2.4% in 2024."

On day one he didn't fix it. Weird. www.bea.gov/news/2026/gd...

20.02.2026 15:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
I write separately to explain why the statute at issue here
is consistent with the separation of powers as an original
matter. The Constitution’s separation of powers forbids
Congress from delegating core legislative power to the President. This principle, known as the nondelegation doctrine,
is rooted in the Constitution’s Legislative Vesting Clause
and Due Process Clause. Art. I, Β§1; Amdt. 5. Both Clauses
forbid Congress from delegating core legislative power,
which is the power to make substantive rules setting the
conditions for deprivations of life, liberty, or property. Neither Clause prohibits Congress from delegating other kinds
of power. Because the Constitution assigns Congress many
powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine,
Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the
President. Congress has done so repeatedly since the
founding, with this Court’s blessing.
The power to impose duties on imports can be delegated.

I write separately to explain why the statute at issue here is consistent with the separation of powers as an original matter. The Constitution’s separation of powers forbids Congress from delegating core legislative power to the President. This principle, known as the nondelegation doctrine, is rooted in the Constitution’s Legislative Vesting Clause and Due Process Clause. Art. I, Β§1; Amdt. 5. Both Clauses forbid Congress from delegating core legislative power, which is the power to make substantive rules setting the conditions for deprivations of life, liberty, or property. Neither Clause prohibits Congress from delegating other kinds of power. Because the Constitution assigns Congress many powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the President. Congress has done so repeatedly since the founding, with this Court’s blessing. The power to impose duties on imports can be delegated.

In dissent, Thomas debuts a new, Trump-friendly theory that the non-delegation doctrine does not apply to former "powers of the Crown," including tariffs, which are ostensibly not "within the core legislative power." This seems brazenly gerrymandered to accommodate Trump's wishes ...

20.02.2026 15:21 β€” πŸ‘ 858    πŸ” 143    πŸ’¬ 54    πŸ“Œ 84
JUSTICE GORSUCH claims not to understand this statement, insisting
that I now must be applying the major-questions doctrine, and his own
version of it to boot. See ante, at 17 (concurring opinion) (β€œMy concurring
colleagues all but endorse it today”); ante, at 2, 7, 18 (similar). Given
how strong his apparent desire for converts, see ante, at 2–26, I almost
regret to inform him that I am not one. But that is the fact of the matter.
I proceed in this case just as I did in West Virginia and Nebraska: I consider a delegation provision’s language, broaden the scope to take in the
statutory setting, and apply some common sense about how Congress
normally delegates. See West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U. S. 697, 756–766
(2022) (KAGAN, J., dissenting); Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U. S. 477, 534–
542 (2023) (KAGAN, J., dissenting). Contrary to JUSTICE GORSUCH’s suggestion, see ante, at 3–7, that conventional method of interpretation will
not always favor (or always disfavor) executive officials, given the variety
of delegation schemes Congress adopts. I’ll let JUSTICE GORSUCH relitigate on his own our old debates about other statutes, unrelated to the
one before us. What matters here is only that IEEPA’s delegation refutes
the Executive’s assertion of authority to levy tariffs, without any help
from the major-questions doctrine.

JUSTICE GORSUCH claims not to understand this statement, insisting that I now must be applying the major-questions doctrine, and his own version of it to boot. See ante, at 17 (concurring opinion) (β€œMy concurring colleagues all but endorse it today”); ante, at 2, 7, 18 (similar). Given how strong his apparent desire for converts, see ante, at 2–26, I almost regret to inform him that I am not one. But that is the fact of the matter. I proceed in this case just as I did in West Virginia and Nebraska: I consider a delegation provision’s language, broaden the scope to take in the statutory setting, and apply some common sense about how Congress normally delegates. See West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U. S. 697, 756–766 (2022) (KAGAN, J., dissenting); Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U. S. 477, 534– 542 (2023) (KAGAN, J., dissenting). Contrary to JUSTICE GORSUCH’s suggestion, see ante, at 3–7, that conventional method of interpretation will not always favor (or always disfavor) executive officials, given the variety of delegation schemes Congress adopts. I’ll let JUSTICE GORSUCH relitigate on his own our old debates about other statutes, unrelated to the one before us. What matters here is only that IEEPA’s delegation refutes the Executive’s assertion of authority to levy tariffs, without any help from the major-questions doctrine.

Gorsuch also tries to conscript Kagan to the major questions camp in his concurrence, prompting Kagan to write this very funny footnote saying she is not, in fact, a convert to his cause. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

20.02.2026 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1211    πŸ” 182    πŸ’¬ 28    πŸ“Œ 31

Hilariously, Gorsuch and Barrett have a side-battle over the major questions doctrine, with Gorsuch writing a 46-page solo concurrence saying it's a substantive canon and Barrett saying it's a mere tool of statutory interpretation. So these two can't even agree on what the "doctrine" actually means.

20.02.2026 15:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1132    πŸ” 138    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 30

Thomas, Kavanaugh, Alito dissent.

Roberts writes the lead opinion. With Gorsuch and Barrett, he invokes the "major questions doctrine" to strike down the tariffs.

The three liberals say the major questions doctrine isn't needed to find the tariffs unlawful. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

20.02.2026 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1158    πŸ” 173    πŸ’¬ 24    πŸ“Œ 34
Preview
Trump warns of β€˜bad things’ if Iran refuses deal, as US carrier nears Mideast The U.S. and Iran are signaling they're prepared for war if talks on Tehran’s nuclear program fizzle out, as a second U.S. aircraft carrier nears the Middle East.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court strikes down President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, upending the central plank of his economic agenda. Follow the latest updates.

20.02.2026 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 424    πŸ” 111    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 93
Masked paramilitaries marching in front of a hanging Trump banner on the DoJ

Masked paramilitaries marching in front of a hanging Trump banner on the DoJ

This picture is so crazy that if you had this as a scene in a made-for-TV dystopian scifi movie in like 2014 people would switch channels because you’d ruined the suspension of disbelief.

20.02.2026 04:58 β€” πŸ‘ 5315    πŸ” 1337    πŸ’¬ 79    πŸ“Œ 77
Post image 20.02.2026 14:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

+1 for no smoke though.

20.02.2026 04:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ray Ban-Meta AI Glasses: Glasses So Tacky It's Illegal

20.02.2026 00:52 β€” πŸ‘ 151    πŸ” 43    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I absolutely guarantee you he didn’t say any of this

20.02.2026 00:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1052    πŸ” 145    πŸ’¬ 75    πŸ“Œ 14

Remember the moral panic about safetyism? Trigger warnings? Snowflakes? Well, its actually happening in Texas.

19.02.2026 22:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1858    πŸ” 497    πŸ’¬ 45    πŸ“Œ 16

It really is amazing. There's gotta be a section in every major intelligence agency now devoted to figuring out where the smart money is.

19.02.2026 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Hackers made death threats against this security researcher. Big mistake. Allison Nixon had helped arrest dozens of members of The Com β€” a loose affiliation of online groups responsible for violence and hacking campaigns. Then she became a target.

This came across my feed a few minutes ago. The Com was the crime gang the kid was affiliated with. www.technologyreview.com/2026/02/16/1...

19.02.2026 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh fuck off.

19.02.2026 22:02 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The improvement of the top figure skaters over those from 40 years ago is even steeper than the improvement of gymnasts.

19.02.2026 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As one Yemeni friend in Aden put it recently:

β€œWe’ve gone from being 50% occupied (by the UAE) to 100% occupied (by Saudi Arabia). Occupied always.”

- the latter being a reference to previously being β€œoccupied” by the north since 1994.

19.02.2026 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Exclusive: FBI plans to reduce vetting of some applying to be agents, sources say The FBI plans to make it easier for existing employees to become agents, removing two long-standing steps in vetting applicants as the bureau faces a staffing crunch under President Donald Trump's adm...

Kash Patel lowering standards for hiring people from within FBI to become Agents.

www.reuters.com/world/fbi-pl...

19.02.2026 21:35 β€” πŸ‘ 271    πŸ” 137    πŸ’¬ 30    πŸ“Œ 15
Post image

Enough.

19.02.2026 21:15 β€” πŸ‘ 289    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 43
Rep Melanie Stansbury (D) New Mexico on Twitter today posting "This is not legal with a blue arrow pointing down emoji as a quote reply to a blue check Aaron Blake saying Trump announces he's transferring $10 billion from the US government to his "Board of Peace," which critics have likened to a giant slush fund Trump will control then a CNN link

Rep Melanie Stansbury (D) New Mexico on Twitter today posting "This is not legal with a blue arrow pointing down emoji as a quote reply to a blue check Aaron Blake saying Trump announces he's transferring $10 billion from the US government to his "Board of Peace," which critics have likened to a giant slush fund Trump will control then a CNN link

I wish when I did crimes that the only consequence was that people like the entire Democratic establishment would post "that's not legal" with a sad face emoji while quoting news stories about me doing all those crimes I just keep doing

19.02.2026 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1168    πŸ” 251    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 16

Masnick: "This is what so many of us kept pointing out throughout the 'Twitter Files' hysteria: the 'free speech' grift was never about protecting individuals from the state. It was about protecting a specific type of speaker from the social consequences of their speech."

19.02.2026 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 566    πŸ” 182    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 6

I hope they play absolute hardball with him, convict him, and then get him to rat all his mates out with the lure of extra commissary privileges or extra time in the yard.

19.02.2026 20:53 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@bungdan is following 20 prominent accounts