Dβexpert « anti-vaxΒ Β»
Je ne trouve pas idΓ©ologie dans la pyramide du niveau de preuve. Et vous?
@jjparienti.bsky.social
π«π· MD, PhD Stat | Prof. Public Health | π Consultant | AEditor @CID @JID @OFID | ChessβοΈ| Pokerβ¦οΈ| Lampshade π‘ Best Handmade lampshades: https://www.etsy.com/fr/shop/EtincellecreationFR?ref=shop-header-name&listing_id=1804732359&from_page=listing
Dβexpert « anti-vaxΒ Β»
Je ne trouve pas idΓ©ologie dans la pyramide du niveau de preuve. Et vous?
Does subclavian CVC still carry higher pneumothorax risk in the ultrasound era? π«
New emulated reanalysis of the 3SITES RCT shows:
β Subclavian excess PNO risk DISAPPEARS with ultrasound
β
LOWER CRBSI w subclavian vs jugular/femoral
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Proud to hit 100 peer-reviews for @TheLancetHIV! π
As a stats reviewer, here are 3 red flags ππthat yields to rejectβοΈ:
1οΈβ£ Cc driven by hypothesis, not data π
2οΈβ£ Primary outcome swap for p-value π΅π»ββοΈ
3οΈβ£ Stats copy-pasted π€‘ by ppl who donβt understands it
#HIV #peerRW
My birth date (DD/MM/YY) is not just a #palindrome
It combines the #worst and the #best hand in #poker
27 - AA - 72 !
π
π
Cluster of 3 lampshades
Colors are not random
Do you like the intra-class correlation?
#Handmade in π«π·
In the context of vaccine hesitancyπ±, this outstanding researchπ€©highlights decades of dedicated efforts to develop safe and effective vaccinesπ. πππ
Smallpox eradication to modern innovations,
π history and rigorous processes behind these life-saving tools.
FREE!
academic.oup.com/cid/issue/81...
Masterclass prΓ©sentation by Prof. Anne-Genevieve Marcelin on new ART @eacsociety.bsky.social #EACS2025Paris
NO SEAT AVAILABLE!
#IDSky #HIVSky
Trop de haine pour que Γ§a tienne
09.10.2025 07:25 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
Letβs go dismantle the methodological puzzle of the link btw InSTI and cardiometabolic risk among #PWH at #SynergieResistance #Aix_en_provence
The thème is Gardian of the Galaxy!
#RESPOND #SwissCohort #HIV_Causal
Exactement! Lamelles = danger pour le nΓ©ophyte
28.09.2025 08:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
En Γ©vitant ceux Γ lamelles, Γ§a rΓ©duit fortement le risqueβ¦
Il reste bolets et cèpes !
Table 2. Incidence of RSV-Associated Secondary End Points in RSV Season 1.
RSV remains a severe infection in infants and children. In this report, data on the activity of clesrovimab, a long-lasting RSV monoclonal antibody, are described as compared with palivizumab. Full interim results for the SMART phase 3 trial: nej.md/4poVkDE
#MedSky #IDSky #PedSky
This challenge could be repeated π
based on mood or surroundings
Rock b6, then Q takes K
15.09.2025 19:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Sometimes correlation does not mean causation
Sometimes outlier does not improve precision
Sometimes it does.
Lovely!
Racoon in French is **raton laveur**
*Laveur* means "washer" from the observed behavior of raccoons, which often handle their food near water, giving the impression that they are "washing" it
Always a pleasure to help the french speaking community
Just tag my name and SuperStat JJ π¦ΈββοΈ will be there from π«π· for RπRπ
π
Looks like ppl on IV Tx were more severe?
21.08.2025 08:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
CID: Background HIV Incidence in PURPOSE 1 and 2 PrEP trials
Jean-Jacques Parienti
HIV incidence among low-adherence oral PrEP users in PURPOSE 1 and 2 closely matched or slightly exceeded background HIV incidence
bit.ly/4ltz5JO
But I agree w you it is not straightforward when you do not practice stat methodology daily.
14.08.2025 20:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Because it is around 50% (π @ the 95% CI rather than point estimate) this result is perfectly consistant with the similar clinical success (i.e. NI for secondary endpoint).
W Dalba, you avoid central venous access, as u said« which are not risk-free spigot » (quote from my mentor Len Mermel!)
Oh, wow!
The vaccine to this wrong belief is:
Au are talking about the probability for Dalba to be superior to SOC on the DOOR outcome.
Here a paper w nice illustrations academic.oup.com/cid/advance-...
14.08.2025 18:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
As a poker player, I am well trained to the prob of having the best hand.
Hands w <50% is not good in heads-up @paulsaxmd.bsky.social
Think of the discrimination index for a diagnostic test. The cut-off for the area under the ROC curve to be useful is 50%
Yes.
But the authors also provided efficacy results (secondary outcome) in a more traditional way, i.e. Risk Difference and 95% CI btw the 2 randomized arms, and had computed a NI margin a priori, Albert underpoweredπ
It seems they have done all this for ppl who like to keep the door closed
This is was I did & bHIV underestimated the risk of HIV (conservative)
πππ
What if comparing :
π΅ background #HIV incidence (MODEL)
to
π΄ HIV incidence (REAL) among ppl w low-level adherence to oral #PrEP (<2π/wk by DBS- unprotected)
in PURPOSE trials?
ππΎππ½ππ»π
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-...
π«π· I generally reply in french question asked in french
βοΈLike in chess openings, the back defense is driven by the white first moves? ππ
Ty for nice wordsπ
Pas besoin dβΓͺtre PhD en stat pour penser que cβest probablement pas trΓ¨s diffΓ©rent !
14.08.2025 12:00 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0