Kenneth Black's Avatar

Kenneth Black

@kennethblack.bsky.social

PhD candidate at MIT philosophy, doing philosophy of: mind/cog sci, language/linguistics, science (he/him) kennethblackphi.com

482 Followers  |  417 Following  |  520 Posts  |  Joined: 30.11.2024  |  2.1549

Latest posts by kennethblack.bsky.social on Bluesky

Granny’s turning over in her grave

03.08.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Never let your guard down

03.08.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*looks around nervously for hyperintensional metaphysicians that will say making music is merely coextensional with rearranging β€œLow” in those worlds, not that making music just is doing that*

03.08.2025 01:48 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

01.08.2025 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Most of the instances talk about giving/lending/paying credence to people or sometimes to claims. There is some measurement (β€œmuch/any credence”) but nothing quantitative like β€œcredence 0.7” (2/2)

01.08.2025 18:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I think I only really started hearing numbers attached to β€œcredence” in grad school. Here’s some hits for credence in the corpus of contemporary American Englishβ€”I couldn’t find any with numerical measurements, although I definitely didn’t look at everything (1/2)

01.08.2025 18:31 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

(i), but I suspect that that’s just conventionβ€”pretty sure β€œcredence .7” doesn’t come from ordinary language

01.08.2025 18:03 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe Fodorians will write this stuff after the AI guys take over

31.07.2025 21:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It has even surpassed the comment count of a certain post about the metadata of a certain important document

31.07.2025 21:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Apology of Granny was a really moving moment in the history of philosophy

31.07.2025 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Sometimes I google an academic paper so I can download it and it says an overview isn’t available, so not all cases are very suggestive

31.07.2025 21:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot of what I describe in the post

Screenshot of what I describe in the post

Paper skygest thought this was real lol

30.07.2025 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Beans-end reasoning, etc etc

29.07.2025 14:06 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Responding to counterexamples to my theory of the semantics of generics by saying "FFS I didn't say the semantics of *all* generics"

29.07.2025 11:44 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Juan Murillo Vargas, How Language-Like is the Language of Thought? - PhilPapers The language of thought hypothesis (LoTH) claims that thoughts are underpinned by language-like vehicles. A central motivation is that there is a relevant similarity between language and thought expla...

Happy to announce that my paper "How Language-Like is the Language of Thought?" is forthcoming at Ergo!

Thread with a TL;DR below!
philpapers.org/rec/MURHLI-3

28.07.2025 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 6

20th century philosophers didn’t have bad citation practices, they were just really good at subtweeting

28.07.2025 12:51 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

is Hulk Hogan really the biggest wrestling star of all time?

not even closeβ€”nobody has ever claimed that "the safest general characterisation of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Hulk Hogan".

27.07.2025 19:13 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0

Gettier: 1 like β€” 1 counterexample

26.07.2025 00:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If classic adverbialism is that I perceive that p iff I’m β€œappeared to p-ly” or something like that, I think the view db sketched for belief was different: representing beliefly that p (db’s sketch, looks representationalist) vs things belief-appearing p-ly (which is closer to classic adverbialism)

25.07.2025 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think some representationalist views could be glossed this way, if they say to believe that p is to have a representation that p with a certain belief-y role. It’s the representation whose content is p; the agent believes that p because they have the representation in the beliefy way

25.07.2025 18:20 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You’ll be the first acknowledgement

25.07.2025 00:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Potential weather conditions, interestingly, are the only kind which *may* affect but never *actually* affect

25.07.2025 00:23 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Great, now we’re going to have a bunch of little modal realists running around

22.07.2025 21:47 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

where do they FIND these people?!

22.07.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 113    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0
Regrettably, for reasons of space we'll have to pass over these questions, sticking to examples straightforward enough that they do not arise so urgently. (But see Hall 2006β€”the extended version of this paper from which the present version is extracted-for extensive discussion. Hereafter, "the extended version".)

Regrettably, for reasons of space we'll have to pass over these questions, sticking to examples straightforward enough that they do not arise so urgently. (But see Hall 2006β€”the extended version of this paper from which the present version is extracted-for extensive discussion. Hereafter, "the extended version".)

In β€œStructural equations and causation,” Ned Hall makes frequent reference to an β€œextended version,” but with no indication of how to read it

21.07.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I also would have thought that isn’t a crazy revelation

20.07.2025 17:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Actual footage of EJ Green and Noam Chompers in the wild

20.07.2025 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I suppose we have Kripke to thank for that

20.07.2025 13:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

IMO analytic philosophy is super cool in the way that prog rock is super cool, but that comparison probably wouldn’t give it a boost in most people’s eyes

19.07.2025 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My entire life, I bored people, talking about shit they didn't care about (so lonely). Until Analytic Philosophy wrapped me in her sinewy embrace and said "Child, everyone here is just as boring as you. Probably even more boring, actually." And I Wept, for I was Home

19.07.2025 04:56 β€” πŸ‘ 180    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 2

@kennethblack is following 20 prominent accounts