What does “Mercurial” mean to Apparition Lit? - Apparition Literary Magazine
BIPOC writers!
the @apparitionlit.com MERCURIAL issue (which i am guest editing) is currently OPEN!!! we'd love to read your stories and have them in this absolutely amazing call! the submissions window is linked in the next post.
here's a blog post of what we're looking for!
03.03.2024 22:25 —
👍 40
🔁 50
💬 1
📌 1
I'm not sold on this method of literary analysis. But I think it's a much healthier approach than the "media as didactic" lens that so many people in the modern world have unwittingly adopted. Fictional worlds and characters CAN be subject to scrutiny. This is a healthier lens.
04.03.2024 10:55 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Humans do not behave arbitrarily or without reason. We behave according to knowable laws. Therefore, even fictional beings should behave according to knowable laws. How closely they adhere to those laws should be at least one barometer by which we gauge the "truth" of a narrative.
04.03.2024 10:54 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Basically, he's saying that since the affairs of man are subject to laws which are scrutable, history should follow those laws insofar as they are known. And likewise, extrapolates this to fictional narratives.
04.03.2024 10:54 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I also think that Trotsky's contemporary idea of "hardness" in science & history differs a bit from our own, and really is more akin to "objective" as opposed to the histories of, say, Herodotus or Strabo.
04.03.2024 10:54 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Not to say that sciences don't require interpretation at all. Science is a sociological exercise rendering the physical world comprehensible to humans. But historical interpretation requires guessing, value judgments, and other mechanisms that are superfluous in most sciences.
04.03.2024 10:54 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
First, I don't much care for the hard scientism of that era of Marxists when it comes to the examination of history, as history is more than a collection of verifiable numbers, and requires interpretation - in a way that, say, biology does not.
04.03.2024 10:53 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Was just reading this, as I'd heard about it on a Jonas Ceika video. And it's got me thinking about folk art criticism in the modern day. Otherwise known as "media literacy."
04.03.2024 10:53 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Which in turn fuels ideas for the next video. Editing is exhausting but it helps me grow not just the craft of editing but also my ideas as a creator.
30.08.2023 10:19 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I’m still growing as a content creator, and one thing I didn’t really anticipate was how the editing process would cause me to further develop my ideas. I start debating the self of a few hours or days ago.
30.08.2023 10:19 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Discussing how nerd media has become one of the most enduring stages for the culture war. 00:00 Intro00:54 Nerd Culture War02:04 Right Wing Propaganda03:49 "...
Right Wing Propaganda
Getting used to content creation is a whole experience. This is my third video, about nerd media, “the culture war” and the true enemy: capitalism.
30.08.2023 10:17 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I've been thinking about fictional characters who are not condemned by the text while they engage in unambiguously terrible behavior. Not an antihero or villain, a character the audience is meant to respect. And yet they engage in abject evil
I think action movies of the 80s and 90s did this often.
24.08.2023 14:40 —
👍 6
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0