Can’t wait for next Friday……
05.03.2026 22:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is an area of provision we need to be thinking hard and thinking often about if we want the system to work better for children who need something more to thrive. The benefits we saw when we were involved in something similar were significant, and the consequences of its closure profound.
05.03.2026 13:04 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
The technical note on School's Costs has been published. It is important to note that this doesn't include Specialist Schools, & as such there is no evidence that the Teacher, or indeed Support Staff, pay awards are affordable within that sector.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69a5c5...
Callout reads #FFBWednesday: Connecting UK Educators and Education. A matrix shows excellent people involved in education, including worthy BlueSky contributors: 1. @simonebeach.bsky.social, a primary school headteacher 2. @bennewmark.bsky.social, a secondary school teacher 3. @hoylerosemary.bsky.social, a chair of governors 4. @5naureen.bsky.social, a school governor 5. @primaryteachermary.bsky.social, a primary school teacher 6. @nourishworkplce.bsky.social, a supporter for school wellbeing 7. @simonknight100.bsky.social, a special school headteacher 8. @danlyndon.bsky.social, a secondary history specialist / teacher 9. @schoolsweek.bsky.social, a widely respected education newspaper. Footer reads @9000Lives.org
Bringing #FFBWednesday to BlueSky.
Ready to build genuine education connections?
💫 Like and repost
💫 Comment with your edu bio + #FFBWeds
💫 Follow everyone who participates
Let's create the education community BlueSky deserves.
Coming tomorrow to Bluesky:
Follow Follow Back Wednesday
💫 A chance to find and connect with others who care about UK education.
💫 A chance to help build supportive and friendly education networks here.
💫 #EduSky 💫
There is far too much pressure to live your best life these days. Leave me alone and let me live my most middling life in peace, with the colourful miscellany of highs and lows that naturally entails.
01.03.2026 11:17 — 👍 384 🔁 63 💬 9 📌 5The cost, both monetary & staff capacity / delivery, on specialist sector needs to be very carefully scrutinised. It could be a very positive shift, but it cannot be at the expense of any child’s education.
01.03.2026 12:34 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I think that is an area that needs exploring carefully, but I am uncomfortable with money going out of the system via payments to organisations whose primary function is to make money.
01.03.2026 11:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is why it’s complex. That position would risk compromising the non-maintained sector, who are non-profit charities, and in some cases provide a specialism to meet a need that is such low incidence that an LA would struggle to deliver.
01.03.2026 11:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I love magnolia season
01.03.2026 10:20 — 👍 386 🔁 21 💬 15 📌 3This is the benefit of the consultation process being followed by a significant implementational period. We can collectively grapple with the complexities and take decisions that lead to better outcomes for children in a better functioning system.
01.03.2026 10:48 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Further thought is certainly going to be necessary to reach the right balance. Not least because some organisations in that part of the system support children with incredibly low incidence needs, whose provision would be difficult to replicate in the maintained sector.
01.03.2026 09:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Screen shot from a section of the DfE SEND consultation that discusses independent special school costs.
They have put something in the SEND consultation.
01.03.2026 09:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0For the first time, a British Sign Language rendition of You'll Never Walk Alone was performed at Anfield before Liverpool vs. West Ham ❤️
28.02.2026 15:10 — 👍 3212 🔁 365 💬 56 📌 26
Some news on my next book....
www.thebookseller.com/rights/sam-f...
The return of teacher led SEND education is a positive step. Teachers know what helps children learn and make progress when they gain extra support. Where there is uncertainty, a specialist can be consulted. This was my experience of schools pre 2014. It worked. Now we need the staff, not toys
28.02.2026 14:50 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0And also careful consideration regarding how to release the best specialist sector staff without impacting on specialist sector performance. There will also need to be really effective local/national evaluation of impact to see where it’s working best and identify commonality of need to inform CPD.
28.02.2026 14:22 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is an important part of the reforms, not just getting expertise where it is needed more easily, but also from the point of view of building collective responsibility, with specialist settings & mainstream working in partnership as a community of schools serving a community of children.
28.02.2026 14:16 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0I do hope this will attract experienced EPs back to public service. A broader role and more time to support schools will be a big draw.
28.02.2026 13:54 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Certainly seems to be at our gym. My boys have to wear wristbands when they go, based on age, and that determines what they can use.
28.02.2026 07:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
In a nutshell:
Most edu diagnoses are tautological.
They can help but too often we assume they do and we don't look at the trade offs closely enough.
Last session of the day at @researchedbrum.bsky.social
There is also a real need to ensure that we have absolute clarity about what exceptional Specialist provision look like and why, otherwise we risk knowledge exchange being a form of contagion rather than improvement. And my sector is not the shining example it is sometimes thought to be.
27.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0This is why you need to put in really comprehensive submissions to the consultation, to help make sure that this is not the outcome. The intent of the reforms has the potential to be a real force for good, but only the implementation will ensure that the system delivers it.
27.02.2026 21:14 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I think trying to get the sector to solidify around shared understanding is important, along with agreed language, & accept that not having that is an implementational risk. This may be where groups of schools and better collective responsibility may help to, at least, have a locally agreed vision.
26.02.2026 21:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think we should do the inclusion standards stuff first. Clean up the evidence base etc. Then big changes after that. Everything all at once feels very very very risky.
26.02.2026 20:16 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0I think the knowledge transfer is one of the key things we need to think through carefully. Identify where it’s worked best and learn from the process they went through. Less convinced trying to directly replicate practice will work well.
26.02.2026 20:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Agree on intent. I think the fiscal picture we are looking at makes it risky. I hope I'm wrong. Leaders would always cut back on mainstream classrooms last, and focus on them first. So the mainstream offer is a more protective factor for vulnerable kids if it can be made truly inclusive.
26.02.2026 20:01 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
“Are they safe” is also an issue for some Specialist provision now, given the legally compelled overcrowding the current legal system facilitates. Something the reforms are hoping to address.
I get the implementational concerns, there is loads to think through & risks to overcome, but I am hopeful.
It’s one of the areas where submissions to the consultation would benefit from high levels of specificity in terms of the concerns and how to overcome them. Work we have done in partnership with River Learning Trust, supporting the establishment of good base provision has shown what can be achieved.
26.02.2026 19:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0