Trish Fraser's Avatar

Trish Fraser

@trishf42.bsky.social

Living on stolen land, Wotjobaluk/Wergaia country. (Oz, in case it wasn't clear.) Green leftie. Elderly geek. Braillophile. Ailurophile. she/her

553 Followers  |  627 Following  |  2,864 Posts  |  Joined: 20.12.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Trish Fraser (@trishf42.bsky.social)

Oh, I like this. Yes indeed.

09.03.2026 10:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm loving this, but the dishes won't do themselves (dammit). Carry on, I'll be back later to see where you get to!

09.03.2026 10:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This has been a grand thread, quote posting it before it gets any more away!

09.03.2026 10:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Although you might like a few folks with experience?

09.03.2026 10:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Markets, capitalism. Which qualifications? And how do you tie the media down? Outlaw media handling of pre-election stuff? Make it be candidate to electors only? Might be a way to squish the russian bots...

09.03.2026 10:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So, would you keep capitalism (or some version of it)? The current one rewards people who make lots of money at it; would you maybe penalise them for not contributing? (They think of taxation that way, you could just make that come true...)

09.03.2026 10:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think we're saying they won't hop on said fleet on their own...

09.03.2026 10:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In between the lovely thread I'm in the middle of, I'm reading the Murderbot books. 😁

09.03.2026 10:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So, instead of being geographic, you could go by groups? Or do some kind of version of Shute's multiple votes thing - give folks from more disadvantaged groups more votes?

All the same, it's necessary for a government (for a nation) to also look at things from a planet-wide point of view.

09.03.2026 10:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Any government that doesn't include a diverse roster of people - including ALL groups except people with an income over a certain size - is going to stomp on almost all that diverse roster of people, isn't it?

09.03.2026 10:03 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

And you have to keep Lidia Thorpe!

09.03.2026 10:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You're reminding me of Tomorrow When The War Began. 8-) Wouldn't we have a go at an alliance which included the next-door neighbours?

09.03.2026 09:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep. (And Porleen's mob, and all the single-issue parties.)

09.03.2026 09:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you're taking the whole thing apart, you wouldn't hang on to states. Shires, maybe (although they're kind of prone to the party system too, so problematic).

09.03.2026 09:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You'd deport Mehreen?

09.03.2026 09:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, and it wouldn't hurt to have secondary alliances with other bits of the planet - it might then be possible to work up groups that were of a size to give russia and the us pause, even if China weren't willing to actually take them on?

09.03.2026 09:50 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep. (Some of Europe is bearable, but.)

09.03.2026 09:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Have to agree (except you could keep Shoebridge, and Mehreen, and like that, no?)

09.03.2026 09:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Fibonacci, yes?

09.03.2026 09:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Looking at how the Greens got rolled in Nightcliff on preferences, I think we might be on a hiding to nothing, doing it the polite way...

09.03.2026 09:23 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Arvo, three!

09.03.2026 06:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In an excellent cause.

09.03.2026 05:49 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Morning, Rob...

08.03.2026 21:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Arvo, three!

08.03.2026 01:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Arvo, Rob.

08.03.2026 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Arvo, you three!

07.03.2026 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Morning, Rob.

06.03.2026 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Hey, @support.bsky.team , what about this then? ⬆️ Do you not do accessibility testing?

06.03.2026 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The latest Bluesky update has made it impossible to type in ALT text for users who require large text.

So low vision users can’t provide image details for blind and low vision users.

It’s almost as if Bluesky wants me to leave.

06.03.2026 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 1

Thanks!

06.03.2026 10:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0