it's almost like AIs have a cutoff date to their training material and will gladly tell you this, as will their documentation
09.12.2025 20:02 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@dawnlightmelody.bsky.social
she/it | 22 | "garden variety social failure" | aspiring delver | LGBTESCREAL+ | Aiel, not Jenn Aiel | ι²γγ°δΊγ€ also findable at other posting sites with the same username
it's almost like AIs have a cutoff date to their training material and will gladly tell you this, as will their documentation
09.12.2025 20:02 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yup, here's the less-academic explanation of one of the major datasets: "persistent pseudonyms" (ie, self-chosen usernames) is the most stable and least abusive configuration. Link to academic paper is in there somewhere. theconversation.com/online-anony...
06.12.2025 03:02 β π 47 π 12 π¬ 3 π 1let's fucking goooooooo
06.12.2025 20:44 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0i got it on youtube and the next words out of my mouth cannot be reposted here
03.12.2025 03:37 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0frfr
03.12.2025 03:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think there's way too much pessimism about the possibility of convincing people to change their object level views. On AI and the environment, animal welfare, and mainstream econ, my experience has been that 9 out of 10 people are open to good arguments.
02.12.2025 23:11 β π 28 π 2 π¬ 5 π 0rationally i know this is still good for democrats. irrationally, i'm still sad because it would've been really cool if we had won
03.12.2025 02:12 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0yeah that i agree with. i still do not get why he finds the "psychophysical harmony" thing so compelling, it seems to have the usual structure of "confusing thing, therefore god"
03.12.2025 02:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...he's a college student
01.12.2025 06:59 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0i don't think the videos were particularly convincing - which videos are you talking about?
01.12.2025 06:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0did you get to the fire kasina bit yet? afaict that seems like a pretty clear explanation
01.12.2025 06:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Labor gaining just the tiniest amount of power relative to capital a few years back absolutely broke employers' brains
27.11.2025 19:13 β π 2774 π 730 π¬ 2 π 23afaict the only major rationalist blogger who endorsed it was Bentham's Bulldog, and the others were mostly generic substackers who were friends with BB? to my recollection most people stayed out of it or took the against position
01.12.2025 06:34 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0that i definitely agree with
01.12.2025 06:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0honestly i disagree with this a bit, but this may just be because i'm a habitual mathematician with long timelines
27.11.2025 04:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0yeah i've heard he has very thin skin
honestly mostly just surprised this wasn't there when i checked a month ago
thanks!
27.11.2025 03:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0thanks!
26.11.2025 22:52 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0thanks!
26.11.2025 22:52 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0thinnest skin imaginable lmao
26.11.2025 22:52 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0One day all turkeys will be pardoned
26.11.2025 22:42 β π 29 π 5 π¬ 1 π 1omg i won twitter
26.11.2025 21:59 β π 83 π 2 π¬ 8 π 1it makes some difference, but they've been consistently overrated in reliability for a long time
26.11.2025 21:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0as so often, the explanation is probably 'animals feel emotions that are similar to ours, and when we disregard the evidence to avoid 'anthromorphism' it's fundamentally ideological, not scientific'
26.11.2025 18:23 β π 811 π 131 π¬ 23 π 7yeah :(
26.11.2025 05:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0...what the actual fuck, i thought he was at least kinda cool. fuck him ig
26.11.2025 05:36 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0i don't think this is true but luckily i'm going to be empirically testing soon
25.11.2025 23:39 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0decreasing pressure in one part of the system creates more slack elsewhere and complaints about solidarity are a psyop by conservatives to defang us
25.11.2025 02:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0...why not? it's true and important
24.11.2025 03:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0