Cheshire's Avatar

Cheshire

@thatsregrettab1.bsky.social

@Thatsregrettab1 on Twitter πŸ‘‰ Not a scientist, just a nuisance πŸ‘ˆ Named: β€˜Perpetrator 1’ by @sciguardians.bsky.social CheshireGrins@protonmail.com Kevin Patrick IRL

1,314 Followers  |  257 Following  |  1,384 Posts  |  Joined: 12.09.2023  |  1.8773

Latest posts by thatsregrettab1.bsky.social on Bluesky

PubPeer - Unveiling the multitarget mechanism of Liuwei Dihuang decoct... There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Unveiling the multitarget mechanism of Liuwei Dihuang decoction in autism spectrum disorder via network pharmacology and molecular docking (2025)

Hi @springernature.com
How come this article got published in Scientific Reports despite not meeting any of the criteria you claim to use for clinical trials?
pubpeer.com/publications...
#autism

06.12.2025 13:44 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Schneider Shorts 5.12.2025 – I write poetry and fiction Schneider Shorts 5.12.2025 – a young genius in Oxford, a Greek tobacco shill, a Spanish papermiller, retractions for important men and women, including a retracted retraction, glyphosate pape…

Happy Friday, to those who celebrate!

forbetterscience.com/2025/12/05/s...

05.12.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Schneider Shorts 28.11.2025 – Virtue-signalling retraction lottery Schneider Shorts 28.11.2025 – a Good Russian in eastern Germany, a pensioner victimised in New York, with several MDPI retractions for papermillers and Italian bigwigs, interesting correction…

Happy Friday, to those who celebrate!

forbetterscience.com/2025/11/28/s...

28.11.2025 16:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

I'm no longer surprised by problems in @acm.org papers, but these two PubPeer comments deserve a special mention:

pubpeer.com/publications...
pubpeer.com/publications...

The author in common in both self-plagiarism cases is... the ACM CEO. Oops.

27.11.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Safe travels! πŸ’š

27.11.2025 02:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 26.11.2025 20:54 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

For the curious: pubpeer.com/publications...

26.11.2025 20:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Is it just me or if multiple data errors, issues images are reused within a paper, and across *two* other papers, a sign that a correction is not appropriate.

26.11.2025 20:49 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The blots in the paper are overexposed and pretty low resolution. I can't point to any that have definitively been manipulated, but a few are very similar and may have been duplicated.

26.11.2025 16:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good grief.

Some of the most special memories I have of my family's involvement with a foreign exchange program through the University of Washington was taking these PhD students up into Mount Rainier National Park. Some had really never walked in the snow before.

26.11.2025 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I can take a look tomorrow. Don't know if my particular "talents" as such, will be useful.

26.11.2025 02:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Very small variability of the means across groups looks odd.

25.11.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I find these message very frustrating.

24.11.2025 18:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

New COSIG guide!

24.11.2025 16:13 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

After 4 years, the Wiley journal Macromolecular Symposia retracted this "paper."

pubpeer.com/publications... h/t anon Hoya.

24.11.2025 17:55 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How can this happen in 2024? It’s almost like the big publishers care more about profits than the quality of their product.

24.11.2025 05:30 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Fun times.

Some of the SciGuardians gang thinks posting nonsensical comments on the Retraction Watch site will accomplish something. These people never progressed beyond playground taunts.

retractionwatch.com/2025/11/21/e...

24.11.2025 05:27 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Oopsies.

A 2024(!) travesty of a paper courtesy of @elsevierconnect.bsky.social's Translational Oncology journal and researchers in China.

pubpeer.com/publications...

23.11.2025 18:01 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Patent Office Is About To Make Bad Patents Untouchable The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has proposed new rules that would effectively end the public’s ability to challenge improperly granted patents at the Patent Office itself. We need EFF sup...

www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

23.11.2025 17:34 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Sabine Hazan conflates her case studies as proof that her hypotheses work. Even if those studies were flawless (ed: they’re not) they can only show correlation not causation: suffering from these conditions may lead to gut dysbiosis rather than the other way around.

21.11.2025 16:59 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
First revealed in spy photos, a Bronze Age city emerges from the steppe An unexpectedly large city lies in a sea of grass inhabited largely by nomads.

The city that put the bronze in the Bronze Age?

arstechnica.com/science/2025...

21.11.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My paper about the ScienceGuardians on @themeta.news today!

@elisabethbik.bsky.social @lonnibesancon.bsky.social @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social

21.11.2025 10:58 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Research linking gut microbes to autism is deeply flawed, critics say Amid growing investment in the field, a new paper argues it rests on shaky foundations

Studies of fecal bacteria have led some researchers to propose a link between the gut microbiome and autism.

But a new paper argues the claim rests on shaky foundations. https://scim.ag/48lckEh

19.11.2025 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

Thanks.

Feel free to add your two cents to the thread. πŸ’š

19.11.2025 07:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Opinions please?

There's a duplicated ß-actin band (green).

The author replies, "Because Smad3 is already the right loading control for p-Smad3, thus the last beta-actin is not necessary and we will contact the journal for removal."

Is this legit? πŸ˜•

pubpeer.com/publications...

19.11.2025 06:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm on the shoe team.

πŸ‘ 

19.11.2025 05:56 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

86% seems really high…

to someone that doesn’t have any domain knowledge ➑️ 😸

19.11.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Superhero!

18.11.2025 06:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

"Chasing squiggles" was a talk given at Harvard today. πŸ˜ŠπŸ€™

18.11.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Title slide: What to do next.
Ivan "Pure Evil"* Oransky
Co-founder Retraction Watch
(social media handles)

"99.4% evil, 0.6% Zinfandel, but the (faked) error bars are quite large

Title slide: What to do next. Ivan "Pure Evil"* Oransky Co-founder Retraction Watch (social media handles) "99.4% evil, 0.6% Zinfandel, but the (faked) error bars are quite large

The speaker

The speaker

After the tea break, we continue with Session 7: 'Publication problems', co-chaired by @jabyrnesci.bsky.social and David Vaux.

Ivan Oransky @retractionwatch.com will talk about 'Summing up: What to do next?'

If a headline is a question, the answer is no!
#IRICSydney

18.11.2025 04:18 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

@thatsregrettab1 is following 19 prominent accounts