๐
07.10.2025 23:51 โ ๐ 24 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1@thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
@Thatsregrettab1 on Twitter ๐ Not a scientist, just a nuisance ๐ Named: โPerpetrator 1โ by @sciguardians.bsky.social CheshireGrins@protonmail.com Kevin Patrick IRL
๐
07.10.2025 23:51 โ ๐ 24 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1โItโs the Websters. They say thereโs some pitiful thing dying of thirst out their way, and would we like to come over?โ
โItโs the Websters. They say thereโs some pitiful thing dying of thirst out their way, and would we like to come over?โ
06.10.2025 23:06 โ ๐ 112 ๐ 24 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm deeply honored to have been named as the recipient of the Victor Cohn Prize for Excellence in Medical Science Reporting from the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing. It recognizes my work on scientific integrity for Science Magazine over the last five years. 1/7 tinyurl.com/zz54fzyr
06.10.2025 19:57 โ ๐ 49 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 1Thank you Charles, and congratulations! ๐
07.10.2025 00:03 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Roxanne Styx @roxannestyx.bsky.social IVERMECTIN and CHLORINE DIOXIDE Testimonial - Farmer clears his Lung Cancer, leaving his surgeons dumbfounded DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD JUNE 3 June 3, 2025 at 6:02 PM
The grifters have entered Bluesky.
Makis reckons he can sell bleach with his parasitic drugโฆ for cancer
#QuackMakis #Noncologist
Oopsies.
Courtesy of @mdpiopenaccess.bsky.social journal Cells and researchers from University of Nottingham and De Montfort University Leicester. Paper has already been corrected once.
pubpeer.com/publications...
Weekend reads: Science publishing a โhot messโ; AI microscopy โindistinguishableโ from real; social media as a bellwether for retractions
04.10.2025 12:05 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 5 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Happy Friday to all who celebrate.
forbetterscience.com/2025/10/03/s...
A principled leader? @weldeiry embarrassingly regurgitates press releases for "likes." But he has no engagement on social media... what's the point?
Plus: why did he invite @SabinehazanMD to @WIN_Consortium 2025? She has more retractions than he does.
retractionwatch.com/2025/07/22/m...
A good summary of the YDIH mess by @boslough.bsky.social.
skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/th...
New #MicrobiomeDigest is OUT microbiomedigest.com/2025/10/02/o...
โข Shanghai dog microbiome / @annacusco.bsky.social
โข microbetag / @hariszaf.bsky.social
โข invitation for the #MVIF 42 / @microbiomevif.bsky.social
& more.
Yes, yes, Europe has its benefits. Walkable cities. Cultural heritage. Amazing food. Little gun violence. Healthcare. Governments that are not shut down. But the number of website pop-ups asking one to accept cookies renders the continent pretty much unlivable.
02.10.2025 11:45 โ ๐ 62 ๐ 11 ๐ฌ 9 ๐ 0I think the idea was interesting, but they made some odd choices that make their results somewhat questionable. I think they used an LLM to write the paper. One possible clue: Delve.
02.10.2025 00:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0A former bioinformatics student who operated a paper mill while at the University of Manchester has lost another paper, bringing his total to 11 retractions.
01.10.2025 21:09 โ ๐ 12 ๐ 5 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1I donโt see that the comment on paperstars violates any PubPeer moderation rules, although it is rather generic. Example: the comment about the study design is probably correct, but no specific examples were provided.
paperstars.org/papers/MTAuM...
I have just left a lengthy Pubpeer comment on the autism/Tylenol study being cited by the Trump administration. There appear to be a number of fairly straightforward errors in the paper.
pubpeer.com/publications...
One of my favorite anecdotes from THE PREHISTORY OF THE FAR SIDE: "That doesn't sound like the Jane Goodall we know."
01.10.2025 18:13 โ ๐ 6386 ๐ 2184 ๐ฌ 28 ๐ 72Can you share an example of a comment that was not accepted on PubPeer that was published on Paperstars?
01.10.2025 14:21 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0๐
@elisabethbik.bsky.social
This is a fascinating story.
A Lebanese team published a study showing massive benefits for apple cider vinegar in 2024. People immediately noticed it was problematic, and complained.
BMJ asked the authors for the data, and they sent it through. The study has just been retracted and WOW 1/n
They basically say this themselves.
29.09.2025 18:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A good summary of the YDIH mess by @boslough.bsky.social.
skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/th...
And more.
28.09.2025 19:18 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0There's more.
28.09.2025 19:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0๐ฎ
28.09.2025 05:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A question that I get all the time. I often think the same to myself. We will not be able to understand their motivation & yet should still retract these papers rigorously.
For example this one: Rofeal et al. 2023 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.080) pubpeer.com/publications...
retractionwatch.com/2025/09/26/t...
Via @retractionwatch.com
Happy Friday to those who celebrate!
forbetterscience.com/2025/09/26/s...
Keep fish and seals and cetaceans out of the sea - they injure the pollutants.
26.09.2025 04:13 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโve never even heard of this list. Whatโs it used for? Bragging rights?
26.09.2025 04:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0