Hi @springernature.com
How come this article got published in Scientific Reports despite not meeting any of the criteria you claim to use for clinical trials?
pubpeer.com/publications...
#autism
@thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
@Thatsregrettab1 on Twitter π Not a scientist, just a nuisance π Named: βPerpetrator 1β by @sciguardians.bsky.social CheshireGrins@protonmail.com Kevin Patrick IRL
Hi @springernature.com
How come this article got published in Scientific Reports despite not meeting any of the criteria you claim to use for clinical trials?
pubpeer.com/publications...
#autism
Happy Friday, to those who celebrate!
forbetterscience.com/2025/12/05/s...
Happy Friday, to those who celebrate!
forbetterscience.com/2025/11/28/s...
I'm no longer surprised by problems in @acm.org papers, but these two PubPeer comments deserve a special mention:
pubpeer.com/publications...
pubpeer.com/publications...
The author in common in both self-plagiarism cases is... the ACM CEO. Oops.
Safe travels! π
27.11.2025 02:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For the curious: pubpeer.com/publications...
26.11.2025 20:49 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Is it just me or if multiple data errors, issues images are reused within a paper, and across *two* other papers, a sign that a correction is not appropriate.
26.11.2025 20:49 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0The blots in the paper are overexposed and pretty low resolution. I can't point to any that have definitively been manipulated, but a few are very similar and may have been duplicated.
26.11.2025 16:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Good grief.
Some of the most special memories I have of my family's involvement with a foreign exchange program through the University of Washington was taking these PhD students up into Mount Rainier National Park. Some had really never walked in the snow before.
I can take a look tomorrow. Don't know if my particular "talents" as such, will be useful.
26.11.2025 02:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Very small variability of the means across groups looks odd.
25.11.2025 02:47 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I find these message very frustrating.
24.11.2025 18:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0New COSIG guide!
24.11.2025 16:13 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0After 4 years, the Wiley journal Macromolecular Symposia retracted this "paper."
pubpeer.com/publications... h/t anon Hoya.
How can this happen in 2024? Itβs almost like the big publishers care more about profits than the quality of their product.
24.11.2025 05:30 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fun times.
Some of the SciGuardians gang thinks posting nonsensical comments on the Retraction Watch site will accomplish something. These people never progressed beyond playground taunts.
retractionwatch.com/2025/11/21/e...
Oopsies.
A 2024(!) travesty of a paper courtesy of @elsevierconnect.bsky.social's Translational Oncology journal and researchers in China.
pubpeer.com/publications...
Sabine Hazan conflates her case studies as proof that her hypotheses work. Even if those studies were flawless (ed: theyβre not) they can only show correlation not causation: suffering from these conditions may lead to gut dysbiosis rather than the other way around.
21.11.2025 16:59 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0The city that put the bronze in the Bronze Age?
arstechnica.com/science/2025...
My paper about the ScienceGuardians on @themeta.news today!
@elisabethbik.bsky.social @lonnibesancon.bsky.social @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
Studies of fecal bacteria have led some researchers to propose a link between the gut microbiome and autism.
But a new paper argues the claim rests on shaky foundations. https://scim.ag/48lckEh
Thanks.
Feel free to add your two cents to the thread. π
Opinions please?
There's a duplicated Γ-actin band (green).
The author replies, "Because Smad3 is already the right loading control for p-Smad3, thus the last beta-actin is not necessary and we will contact the journal for removal."
Is this legit? π
pubpeer.com/publications...
I'm on the shoe team.
π
86% seems really highβ¦
to someone that doesnβt have any domain knowledge β‘οΈ πΈ
Superhero!
18.11.2025 06:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Chasing squiggles" was a talk given at Harvard today. ππ€
18.11.2025 03:15 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Title slide: What to do next. Ivan "Pure Evil"* Oransky Co-founder Retraction Watch (social media handles) "99.4% evil, 0.6% Zinfandel, but the (faked) error bars are quite large
The speaker
After the tea break, we continue with Session 7: 'Publication problems', co-chaired by @jabyrnesci.bsky.social and David Vaux.
Ivan Oransky @retractionwatch.com will talk about 'Summing up: What to do next?'
If a headline is a question, the answer is no!
#IRICSydney