@mark-richards.bsky.social
The great @maclomaclee.bsky.social on the future of journal articles: as the numbers of journals, articles increase, the value of the information they provide diminishes or depreciates. Discrete actions can help sustain the value as an economic (and moral?) good @edinburgh-uni.bsky.social #CAMARADES
04.09.2025 13:06 — 👍 5 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0Analysis of authors disclosing AI use in submissions to @bmj.com journals at @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social
#peerreviewcongress
Among 64.7K articles retracted 1971-2025, women were 26% of 1st & 24% of last authors, w highest representation among 1st authors for editor/ publisher errors (33.8%) & among last authors for plagiarism (29%)
Among 64.7K articles retracted 1971-2025, women were 26% of 1st & 24% of last authors, w highest representation among 1st authors for editor/ publisher errors (33.8%) & among last authors for plagiarism (29%)
@ana-catarina.bsky.social @georgeinstitute.bsky.social @retractionwatch.com #retractions
The PNN involved 56 journals across 12 publishers, with Springer Nature (n = 29), Elsevier (n = 26), and Bentham Science Publishers (n = 25) having the most articles involved out of the total (n = 123). The involved authors were affiliated with 40 countries and 232 organizations.
The #Pharmakon Neuroscience Network, involving 361 authors from 40 countries in 123 articles/56 journals from 12 publishers 2019-2025, appears to have grown too rapidly to have developed naturally
@fauxsci.bsky.social @helenedraux.bsky.social @digital-science.com
(see also: doi.org/10.48550/arX...)
24 hours until the 10th Peer Review Congress!
3 days of research and conversation on #AI, #PeerReview, #ResearchIntegrity, and much more!
Stop by the Swissotel on Wacker Drive in Chicago Tue-Fri to say hi & for in-person 1- and 3-day registration.
peerreviewcongress.org
