Scott Wortley

When people talk about great sitcom episodes I am always bemused why it isn't mentioned. So beautifully put together and the performances are superb

I‘m sure there was a law society survey at the time saying lots people joined the profession on the back of it . I bet they got a shock

Coupling, Series 2, Episode 1 - The Man with Two Legs | Watch on U Jeff falls for a fellow train passenger.

Coupling is on the U streaming thing including one of the great sitcom episodes

they did an audio revival of Blake's 7 with Daniela Nardini as Servalan. She was pretty good in the role.

Poet claims she has been cancelled over gender-critical beliefs

Polly Clark, a writer from Argyll, says a glowing review of her work was removed by Gutter magazine because of her social media posts

It was not as preposterously entertaining as Judge John Deed, which would have had a similar time factor

Used to spend time as a trainee lawyer watching This Life and switching off when something unfeasible in the legal profession would happen.
Longest we lasted in an episode was about 3 minutes

I was meaning to imply that 7% standing in only 7 from 73 seats is misleading polling for constituency vote.

the greens doing incredibly well given they are only standing in 7 seats (or perhaps that hasn't been picked up yet)

Kenith Trodd obituary: firebrand TV producer and Dennis Potter’s right-hand man Trodd, who has died aged 90, was the bold and influential producer behind Dennis Potter’s greatest works, championing radical drama and shaping British television with a lifelong commitment to creativ...

We lost Kenith Trodd last weekend, a brilliant producer and forward-thinking man who believed deeply in television and the British screen. He was ahead of his time in many ways. "A film is a film is a film."

My tribute is now up on the BFI website: www.bfi.org.uk/news/kenith-...

Is it really because the "Welsh Assembly" no longer exists?

Must be the secret oilfields from 2014

Reasonable choice

Who do you think they are writing for?
I am struggling to work it about in various cases (eg telegraph)

Hope they kept the eating the dog on the roof bit

RESIGN!

(It's one of the less successful adaptations of JG Ballard #getscoat #runsaway #veryfast)

you and your facts

Teaching Scottish legal system classes interesting to learn we apparently have new courts from the tango man

I would give it to someone like kirsty young

What you commented on initially was my linking to a substack which contained the correspondence. That made clear that a publicly funded publication pulled all reference to her work purely for her legitimately held views. And you commented that views had consequences.
Your position is clear enough

You don't see any problem with that at all?

And your position seems to be that a publicly funded body can effectively suppress reference to the work of someone holding legitimate view (views which are legally protected in equality legislation) purely because they hold these views (which is what the emails Clark refers to indicate).

Your presumption is that the author by stating a sex realist position, that someone's sex matters in various aspects of life, is inherently discriminatory equivalent to racism. Really? Her view should mean that the work of someone else (views unknown), reviewing her book, should be suppressed?

Your position is that Robert Winston and Richard Dawkins and others who believe in a sex binary and that sex cannot be changed (and have said so) are wishful thinkers equivalent to flat earthers. What is your basis for saying they are scientifically illiterate?

Launch reading by Polly Clark, Cathy Galvin and Penelope Shuttle YouTube video by Bloodaxe Books

Some beautiful work from Polly Clark in this online launch.

An interview with poet Polly Clark features in Issue 7 of @madridlitmag.bsky.social. She speaks about her new Bloodaxe retrospective, Afterlife: New & Selected Poems, out today, and shares a poem from the book.

Based on current experience the two small ferries could take up to eight years before still not being finished.

In teaching originalism and dynamism in statutory interpretation comparatively you end up asking in relation to some US materials - what do you think would James Madison have made of the ipad

It's always Carol Ann Duffy. Why is it never Wendy Cope or Nina Cassian? Bloody typical

It's always Carol Ann Duffy. Why is it never Wendy Cope or Nina Cassian? Bloody typical