You should try Pyktok! TikTok has changed its structure a few times, so itβs hard to scrape consistently, but hopefully this will help github.com/dfreelon/pyk...
28.02.2025 15:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@parkerbach.bsky.social
PhD student at UNC. CITAP affiliate. Studying online political culture - prediction markets, humor, influencers, and more. Arguably too much hair. www.parkerbach.com
You should try Pyktok! TikTok has changed its structure a few times, so itβs hard to scrape consistently, but hopefully this will help github.com/dfreelon/pyk...
28.02.2025 15:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Pete Hegseth on FOX NEWS with headline chyron that reads: Tracking Russiaβs Invasion of Ukraine.
Secretary of Defense Hegseth says he doesnβt know if Russia invaded Ukraine. 
This you?
Do you know an MA student or undergrad with a bright future working at the intersections of technology, society, and communication? Encourage them to apply to Predoc position with Microsoft Research's Social Media Collective!
I can't recommend enough!
socialmediacollective.org/2025/01/22/s...
I do love this comment as an endorsement of this piece as foundational literature!
But the real answer is that this is a concept explication. Which means taking a bunch of parallel uses of a concept or an idea and providing them some shared grounding.
I'm so proud of this piece and thrilled for it to be out in the world.
HUGE kudos to @carolynschmitt.bsky.social and @shannimcg.bsky.social for being wonderful coauthors and to @citap.bsky.social for helping us make this piece OPEN ACCESS! Here's the link, one last time: bit.ly/StratAm
Today's empowered far right uses less ambiguity. But when they do, the best thing to do is not to let them get away with it. 
What are they saying? To whom? How are they trying to hide it? And what do they stand to gain? We can fight ambiguity, and we do it with clear-eyed analysis. End/π§΅
Ambiguity is an apt tool for populists. Who are "the people"? Who are "the elites" or "the enemy"? We want "change," but what kind?
Strategic ambiguity allows communicators to let audiences hear the meaning they want to hear. 4/π§΅
Irony fits hand-in-hand with strategic ambiguity. Audiences know ironic messages do not mean what they appear to mean at first glance, but this provides an opportunity for the communicator to encode multiple "true" meanings for different crowds, or default to "It's just a joke!" 3/π§΅
21.02.2025 15:28 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Strategic ambiguity, in our view, is defined by:
1) Polysemy
2) Intended audiences from varying interpretive communities
3) A benefit to be gained from addressing these multiple communities at once
It thus encompasses dog whistles, doublespeak, coded language, and more.
2/π§΅
 π£οΈNew Communication Theory article! With @carolynschmitt.bsky.social and @shannimcg.bsky.social 
Communication can benefit from clarity, but what about a tactical lack of clarity? Here, we explicate "strategic ambiguity" and argue for its importance in political communication. 1/π§΅
bit.ly/StratAm
If SNL doesnβt bring in Tim Robinson to play NYC mayoral candidate Brad Lander I will riot
18.02.2025 02:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Help my friend and cohort-mate do important dissertation research!
06.02.2025 20:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Did we need experts to βquestionβ this for us??? Why canβt we just say it???
Shout out to all my fellow βexpertsβ being asked to confirm that bad things are indeed bad to preserve a misguided sense of journalistic neutrality in outlets that the Right doesnβt read.
Itβs not just sports. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket are now operating legally in the US and were able to ride the wave of sports gambling app popularity and the US presidential election to some pretty major numbers.
31.01.2025 19:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I just hate how dumb the fascist shift in the US has been.
There was no Machiavellian plot.  No critically overlooked flaw in the system. They just said they were gonna do dumb, evil things. And we didnβt stop them. So they did.
I would love for someone to ask Zuck/Meta what βonce again prioritizing speechβ means in this context. I mean, minoritized subjects understand that heβs removing the flimsy guardrails meant to protect us, but Iβm curious what they THINK they are communicating here.
07.01.2025 14:27 β π 28 π 8 π¬ 0 π 0well that turned out to be a bit of an understatement
06.01.2025 15:14 β π 18728 π 1720 π¬ 165 π 37NEW PUB with Lee McGuigan! π
We the Consumers: The Conservative βParallel Economyβ as Reactionary Commodity Activism ijoc.org/index.php/ij...