Will SCOTUS Decide What Its “Essential Functions” Are?
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Bowe v. United States, which raises the question of whether limits on successive habeas petitions for state prisoners also a...
Oral argument today in Bowe v US presents one of the most profound constitutional questions: Just how much power does Article III's Exceptions Clause give Congress to strip SCOTUS of appellate jurisdiction? I offer some history and context in my latest column for @justiaverdict.bsky.social 👇
14.10.2025 11:49 — 👍 114 🔁 51 💬 3 📌 1
Legal Theory Blog
Discover our latest articles and updates. Stay informed with recent posts that cover a variety of topics you care about!
Please help me get the word out about the new websites for Legal Theory Blog and the Legal Theory Lexicon. Reposting here and on other social media sites is great. It would be especially helpful if law school faculty members could send an email to their colleagues with the new addresses.
09.10.2025 15:01 — 👍 87 🔁 93 💬 2 📌 4
Margaret Kwoka
Jotwell Adlaw:
Margaret Kwoka, Informational Accountability for the President, JOTWELL (October 7, 2025) (reviewing Jonathan David Shaub, White House Inspection, 103 Wash. U. L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2026) available at SSRN (Feb. 25, 2025)), adlaw.jotwell.com/informationa....
07.10.2025 15:25 — 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
On Lawfare Daily, @mollyereynolds.bsky.social, Zach Price, and Philip Wallach discuss pocket rescissions as an approach to cancelling funds previously approved by Congress.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawf...
02.09.2025 19:03 — 👍 12 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0
Longer convo, but the exec branch has in the past objected to these types of provisions as unconstitutionally interfering with POTUS authority to control the disclosure of EB info to Congress (derived from its conception of executive privilege) and interpreted them to essentially be a nullity
29.08.2025 20:03 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1
This looks great! I always teach Chadha as one of the pivotal moments in the rise of executive power (and diminishment of congressional checks).... and now I have something new to assign!
21.07.2025 15:11 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Armed Conflict Foreign Relations & International Law
The Law of Going to War With Iran
Scott R. Anderson
Friday, June 20, 2025, 1:45 PM
Share On: f X in $ d B
Right or wrong, the executive branch likely thinks Trump has the legal authority to do it-at least until Congress or the courts say otherwise.
Good time to read (or re-read) my colleague @sranderson.bsky.social’s piece for @lawfaremedia.org:
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
22.06.2025 02:15 — 👍 456 🔁 118 💬 14 📌 9
Extremely proud to be part of this amicus brief filed today to support @citizensforethics.org & transparency into DOGE. Outstanding work on the brief by @campaignlegal.org & incredible amici @ckoningisor.bsky.social, @heidikitrosser.bsky.social, Margaret Kwoka, @gshans.bsky.social, & Rebecca Wexler
23.05.2025 18:29 — 👍 21 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 3
Grateful to the attorneys at Campaign Legal Center (@campaignlegal.org) for their amazing work on this amicus which was just filed at SCOTUS re: DOGE and FOIA, and to @jshaub.bsky.social for convening and leading the charge. www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24...
23.05.2025 16:10 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
looks fascinating... can't wait to read it!
19.05.2025 18:39 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Picture of a University of Kentucky library building with grass and trees in front and dark clouds above
Had a great time visiting @universityofky.bsky.social for the UK Law 2025 Developing Ideas Conference. Thanks to @joshuaadouglas.bsky.social and everyone at UK who helped out!
13.05.2025 21:48 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Seconded!
15.04.2025 19:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
President Trump in the Era of Exclusive Powers - Harvard Law Review
The defining doctrinal innovation of the second Trump administration has been to take the Supreme Court at its word. In recent years, the Court...
I have an essay out in the @HarvLRev blog on "President Trump in the Era of Exclusive Powers."
The basic claim is that we can understand Trump 2.0 as an exercise in taking the Supreme Court's recent separation of powers jurisprudence at its word.
harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04...
14.04.2025 15:27 — 👍 50 🔁 17 💬 1 📌 4
Dark Orgs
In July 2024, a Texas unincorporated nonprofit organization called “Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences” or FASORP sued Northwestern Uni
@brianlfrye.bsky.social wrote a short and great essay about FASORP’s hypocrisy in keeping themselves hidden in connection to their suit against Northwestern Law. Read it here! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
01.04.2025 02:14 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1
we @lawfare.bsky.social ran an article by amanda tyler earlier this week explaining the complexities of habeas relief here. tl;dr there may be real limits to the usefulness of habeas in getting abrego garcia out of this prison. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/juri...
01.04.2025 02:38 — 👍 101 🔁 29 💬 15 📌 1
Screenshot of lawfaremedia.org article
Title: “Jurisdiction and Remedy in J.G.G.
v. Trump”
By: Amanda L. Tyler
“There is ample support for the D.C.
Circuit's jurisdiction in the case. But can it order the return of individuals no longer in the country?”
“The power of the district court to reach habeas petitioners, even overseas, turns on whether the court has the power to reach their custodian…Can U.S. government officials still be deemed to have constructive custody of the individuals removed under the AEA..?”
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/juri...
30.03.2025 16:00 — 👍 333 🔁 72 💬 24 📌 4
on these kinds of questions, my rule is pretty simple... always read Pfander
30.03.2025 14:28 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
well, there *is* some ambiguity here that might support Gemini... as a matter of original public meaning I would argue that some understand "end of" to mean "August"
23.03.2025 03:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Flier provides info about upcoming Developing Ideas Conference in May at the University of Kentucky Law School
For anyone in the region who is interested:
17.03.2025 16:14 — 👍 11 🔁 6 💬 0 📌 0
Associate Counsel, Strategic Legal Advocacy
Earthjustice is looking for an early-career attorney to join the Strategic Legal Advocacy team as an Associate Counsel.
In re: absolutely nothing going on in the world: The SLA team at Earthjustice is looking for an early-career attorney to join us as an Associate Counsel. DC preferred. 1-5 years of experience including any clerkships. Salary is based on experience; range is $106,400-$125,300 in DC.
21.03.2025 17:36 — 👍 28 🔁 20 💬 1 📌 3
congrats, Daniel! UNC is lucky to have you!
20.03.2025 02:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Attempting to hold the president and White House officials accountable necessarily presents a fundamental conundrum—how to balance essential characteristics such as independence and neutrality with electoral accountability and investigative enforcement authority. Since Watergate, our country has relied on two primary methods for White House investigation—either a criminal prosecutor with some independence or congressional investigation. These mechanisms, as well as past approaches, have largely proven inadequate and lately been the subject of extensive criticism. And these problems largely arise out of two overarching characteristics of all past accountability systems: (1) the power to investigate has always been combined with a power to sanction and (2) sufficient power to compel the production of relevant information has been provided only to a criminal prosecutor.
This Article challenges the wisdom of these two characteristics and proposes a new paradigm for addressing accountability holistically. Crucially, this proposal would sever the pure investigatory function—what I call inspection—from any power to sanction and it would empower—for the first time—an independent entity that is not a criminal prosecutor with the authority to compel the production of information and protect its confidentiality. The proposal fits comfortably within the constitutional framework, even under a robust unitary executive view of Article II. And numerous past and existing accountability models, such as independent commissions, judicial misconduct panels, and inspectors general, further support the wisdom and constitutionality of such a proposal.
A Table of Contents of the Article
Very excited that my article "White House Inspection," proposing a new approach to investigations of POTUS & the White House is now forthcoming in Wash U Law Review (& I didn't use autopen, so it's legit)
abstract, TOC, & SSRN link below & *comments welcomed!*
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
19.03.2025 16:51 — 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1
Screenshot of Lawfare Trump litigation tracker, available at https://www.lawfaremedia.org/projects-series/trumps-first-100-days/tracking-trump-administration-litigation
The post says that Lawfare is now tracking 125 cases
Our incredible editorial team (@annahickey.bsky.social et al.) have been diligently tracking the lawsuits brought against the Trump administration.
The @lawfare.bsky.social litigation tracker now includes 125 cases and counting.
🫡 🫡 🫡
www.lawfaremedia.org/projects-ser...
19.03.2025 01:09 — 👍 1283 🔁 387 💬 25 📌 20
The Journal of Things We Like (Lots). Homepage at https://jotwell.com
Law Prof @iumaurerlaw.bsky.social. Civ Pro and Admin with a focus on poverty and inequality. Papers here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2648858
Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School. Teach constitutional law and torts, write on religious liberty and equal protection.
Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School - views are my own. Repost ≠ Endorsement
Constitutional Law, Racial Justice
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1686892
Historian & Director of the Richards Civil War Era Center at Penn State. I study U.S. political, legal, & constitutional history. Writing a book about the political activities & political culture of 19th-century Supreme Court justices. rachelshelden.com
Associate Professor at Mizzou Law | Teaching Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, & Federal Courts | Writing on Civil Rights | Rural Appalachian | Views My Own
Assistant Professor, University of Houston Law Center
Senior Adviser, US Program, International Crisis Group. Editor at Just Security. Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Reiss Center on Law and Security at NYU Law. Ex State Dept Lawyer. War Powers| Use of Force| Counterterrorism| Law of War| War Crimes| Arms Sales
Law professor at the University of Virginia.
Law Professor at George Washington Law. President of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Author of Fearless Speech (2024) and The Cult of the Constitution (2019). First Amendment, civil rights, technology, criminal law, family law, firearms law.
Inequality, higher education, gender, work and organizations, open science, Alaska.
All posts are made in my personal, not professional, capacity. I do not speak for my employer.
Associate Professor, University of Kansas School of Law
Bio: https://law.ku.edu/people/sharon-brett
🌻🌻🌻
Tomlinson Professor of Political Theory, Associate member of Philosophy, Coordinator of Research Group on Constitutional Studies, McGill.
Posts here speak only for myself.
Americo-Canadian; liberaltarian; aging geek.
http://jacobtlevy.com
Constitutional scholar, general law nerd, Izzet mage, bear lover, Mets fan.
Trans rights are constitutional rights!
Uphold Yang Wenli Thought
He/him
https://www.eveningconstitutional.net
I’m a law-themed discovery bot built by @davidcolarusso.com. Follow me to add a dash of law talk to your timeline—roughly 60 posts/day. Approximate algo: follow law folks; share new & popular posts.
Daily digest: https://icymilaw.org (news & scholarship)
Public interest 501(c)(3) law firm for natsec & info/privacy law. Website https://www.nationalsecuritylaw.org. Charitable tax-exempt donations always welcome; details on website front page. Media email Media@ NationalSecurityLaw.org, others email Kel there
Law prof, IP & innovation clinic director. Dad, husband, rescue dog lover, native New Mexican. Interests and clinic practice focus on IP, innovation, AI regulation, online speech, antitrust, privacy and more. Personal account -- all views my own.
Carrie Johnson covers the Justice Department for NPR.
We're a nonpartisan nonprofit advancing democracy through law, focused on voting rights, redistricting, campaign finance and government ethics